Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Senate moves to prevent return of Jewish archive to Iraq [View all]bemildred
(90,061 posts)37. INDIGENOUS AND TRIBAL PEOPLES’ RIGHTS OVER THEIR ANCESTRAL LANDS AND NATURAL RESOURCES
55. The unique relationship between indigenous and tribal peoples and their territories has been broadly recognized in international human rights law. Article 21 of the American Convention and Article XXIII of the American Declaration protect this close bond with the land, as well as with the natural resources of the ancestral territories,[135] a bond of fundamental importance for the enjoyment of other human rights of indigenous and tribal peoples.[136] As reiterated by the IACHR and the Inter-American Court, preserving the particular connection between indigenous communities and their lands and resources is linked to these peoples very existence and thus warrants special measures of protection.[137] The Inter-American Court has insisted that States must respect the special relationship that members of indigenous and tribal peoples have with their territory in a way that guarantees their social, cultural, and economic survival.[138] For the IACHR, the special relationship between indigenous and tribal peoples and their territories means that the use and enjoyment of the land and its resources are integral components of the physical and cultural survival of the indigenous communities and the effective realization of their human rights more broadly.[139]
http://cidh.org/countryrep/Indigenous-Lands09/Chap.V-VI.htm
That's the OAS there.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
56 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I'd rather that they returned the archeological artifacts that they "liberated" at that time ...
Nihil
Feb 2014
#2
Extremely mixed feelings. I don't want to be looting any country, but.... Send it back. Iraq had...
marble falls
Feb 2014
#4
Again. The Iraqis have been curating and eshibiting these treasures. Most countries not only ....
marble falls
Feb 2014
#44
The next time you sell your home, remember it was stolen from Native Americans.
happyslug
Feb 2014
#18
"It was taken by force and deceit from peoples who had lived there for thousands of years"
EX500rider
Feb 2014
#27
INDIGENOUS AND TRIBAL PEOPLES’ RIGHTS OVER THEIR ANCESTRAL LANDS AND NATURAL RESOURCES
bemildred
Feb 2014
#37
So your neighbors can kill you and take your land but not somebody further away?
EX500rider
Feb 2014
#43
Ely Parker said it best when he told some Native Americans "You have the rights the white man grants
happyslug
Feb 2014
#30
I was just pointing out the problem the writer had with returning the property to Iraq
happyslug
Feb 2014
#24
Right, 'cause if u use the term American Indian u HAVE to be a right winger...lol n/t
EX500rider
Feb 2014
#53
Every nation, including Iraq, has laws preventing people from taking cultural artifacts.
Xithras
Feb 2014
#22