Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Igel

(37,535 posts)
24. Some is ideological.
Tue Feb 11, 2014, 08:43 PM
Feb 2014

Some is ill-will.

Some is simple distrust.

It's easy to cite projections. They're not real. They're projections. Same for promises.

Take the Medicare reduction that the CBO includes in its budget projection every year. It was supposed to have occurred a decade ago, as part of a budget deal--"You agree to this, I'll agree to that." But because it was unpopular to do so, the reduction is revoked every year. In other words, the law is overriden annually. The deal it was part of is forgotten, but the law and ignoring the law soldiers on.

Or take mandated special education funding. Every year Congress is supposed to fully fund certain mandated programs. It has never done so. In some years it's doing good to fund 50% of what is obligated itself to fund. In this case school dsitricts and states cough up the billions of dollars. Because they pay for the SpEd services that Congress required, they have less money for other things. In this case, it's easy expediency: If Congress actually paid that money out it would have bigger deficits or less money for things that more people care about.

The list goes on. Unfunded research promises, unfunded clean-ups, unfunded programs for this and that. All promises made, and all included in some projected funding and projected expenses.

This isn't an ACA issue. It's not a (D) versus (R) issue, by and large. It's a Congress issue.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Geeze sakabatou Feb 2014 #1
Why? yeoman6987 Feb 2014 #2
That is not a correct statement. The federal subsidies will not end in three years. The Velveteen Ocelot Feb 2014 #6
Some is ideological. Igel Feb 2014 #24
Pukers sure have a lot of "brass". SoapBox Feb 2014 #3
Living in this state, I can say that liberalhistorian Feb 2014 #10
Liberalhistorian, yes, you are correct. But like so many places... prairierose Feb 2014 #19
This doesn't surprise me newfie11 Feb 2014 #4
Please Sir or Madam, do not insult my "pugs"... Swede Atlanta Feb 2014 #7
Omg I am so sorry for disparaging their breed. Please tell your Pugs I will never do it again. newfie11 Feb 2014 #21
tyranny (NT) The Wizard Feb 2014 #5
I live in this liberalhistorian Feb 2014 #8
I travel there frequently. progressoid Feb 2014 #17
So much for democracy oldandhappy Feb 2014 #9
"Letting the people decide" political issues CAN be very, very bad; what if they allowed Fred Sanders Feb 2014 #11
Where are you coming from? The legislatures have NOT been doing their jobs, which is why state have lostincalifornia Feb 2014 #14
Yet everytime they speak EC Feb 2014 #12
The state of George McGovern should be ashamed to have these representatives in their legislature lostincalifornia Feb 2014 #13
Well, at least South Dakotans will never know about this, since real news is never reported. nt valerief Feb 2014 #15
So very true. Nt newfie11 Feb 2014 #23
ALL pols in general Old Codger Feb 2014 #16
Republicans only like democracy when they can control it. tanyev Feb 2014 #18
As a registered South Dakota voter, I can say my peers are dumb as rocks. Comrade Grumpy Feb 2014 #20
Evil to the core. nt Cali_Democrat Feb 2014 #22
PROOF that republicans hate democracy tabasco Feb 2014 #25
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Republicans Block South D...»Reply #24