Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Fool Count

(1,230 posts)
19. Assad most certainly has an incentive for peace. Maybe even more than one.
Sun Mar 11, 2012, 07:42 AM
Mar 2012

One doesn't need to be magnanimous to appreciate that in war both sides suffer.
He continues to command loyalty of his immediate circle, if not a majority of Syrian
people, not by being completely indifferent to their safety, fate and interests. His
main interest may be in protecting himself, his family and his inner circle - but
even that is best achieved in context of a comprehensive peace settlement in Syria.
Presenting him as some sort of Nero-style homicidal maniac who cares nothing
about any of his subjects and is interested only in killing as many people as he can
may be a smart propaganda, but has little to do with reality. Negotiation is not a game
of croquet - level playing field is never a precondition for one. Any party would want to
tilt the field in their favor before coming to the table. If the opposition thinks that
a long bloody fight with Assad will help them to level the field - they are delusional.
They are just trying to hold out for US/NATO/Arab military intervention and any
negotiation will clearly throw a wrench into this plan. That's why they will keep
refusing to come to the table, not because they don't trust Assad or wouldn't
negotiate with a murderer. All it takes for them to change that position is for US/NATO
to stop leading them on and state unambiguously that there will be no military
intervention on their behalf.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Spam deleted by uppityperson (MIR Team) asfghjkyu Mar 2012 #1
There is no point in negotiating with terrorists. They don't care about lives and suffering Fool Count Mar 2012 #2
The terrorist is Assad. Odin2005 Mar 2012 #3
They're all terrorists. Why switch? leveymg Mar 2012 #4
much of it is indeed lies from the Muslim Brotherhood front groups and media agents Alamuti Lotus Mar 2012 #5
Many of this regime change propaganda ends up being posted here by a few single-issue posters. leveymg Mar 2012 #11
If Bashar Al Assad could get all the representatives of the opposition in one room for dialogue ... Selatius Mar 2012 #6
And what if he does sit down and negotiate? Fool Count Mar 2012 #7
What's he going to do? Negotiate himself out of power? Selatius Mar 2012 #8
How the hell would we know what's he going to do unless we negotiate? Fool Count Mar 2012 #9
I just don't think Assad will negotiate if he still feels he can crush the opposition. Selatius Mar 2012 #15
That's just your suggestion on what you would do in Assad's place, which is based, Fool Count Mar 2012 #16
We're actually on the same page as far as peace. I'd rather there be a negotiation process. Selatius Mar 2012 #18
Assad most certainly has an incentive for peace. Maybe even more than one. Fool Count Mar 2012 #19
What about East Germany, South Africa, Hungary, Poland, etc. etc.? David__77 Mar 2012 #13
The big difference is the Eastern Bloc governments didn't slaughter their own citizens en masse. Selatius Mar 2012 #14
The Syrian government would negotiate with some opposition forces. David__77 Mar 2012 #12
Killing folks before they kill you? Killing people who threaten to overthrow your government... nanabugg Mar 2012 #17
Spam deleted by OKNancy (MIR Team) angles Mar 2012 #10
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Syrian rebels reject Anna...»Reply #19