Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It should be renamed "The Profiteer" Renew Deal Feb 2014 #1
That enterpreneurial spirit is so American, isn't it?` bemildred Feb 2014 #2
Thank you, why people excuse this guy is beyond me! Demenace Feb 2014 #3
He is not the owner or even a partner in the company. Luminous Animal Feb 2014 #5
And your proof that they wouldn't be published is what? Renew Deal Feb 2014 #10
No, it's the government who is fucking us. DeSwiss Feb 2014 #34
RIDICULOUS -- in THIS world, as it is, you need big bucks to be heard in the mainstream! cloudythescribbler Feb 2014 #4
Then how did this story get so much attention? Renew Deal Feb 2014 #8
Because they were published by big bucks news orgs. Luminous Animal Feb 2014 #11
Exactly Renew Deal Feb 2014 #17
And Greenwald et al have been publishing quality stuff for other big bucks news orgs. Luminous Animal Feb 2014 #18
And this is good, how? joshcryer Feb 2014 #24
Why do you lie Josh. That shows absolutely nothing. After the cables were dumped by the Guardian, Luminous Animal Feb 2014 #25
Wikileaks had the cables in Feb. They didn't get traction until Dec. joshcryer Feb 2014 #26
You are so wrong. February of 2010 is when Wikileaks received the cables. November of 2010 is when Luminous Animal Feb 2014 #27
The first cable was published 18 February. joshcryer Feb 2014 #29
You are right. Address the rest of my timeline. Luminous Animal Feb 2014 #31
Heh. joshcryer Feb 2014 #32
Yes. I have lived 25 years in my rent controlled spartment Luminous Animal Feb 2014 #38
So you believe that journalists should not get paid? Luminous Animal Feb 2014 #6
Your mistake is calling Greenwald a "journalist" Renew Deal Feb 2014 #7
Vitriol is all you've got. Sad. Comrade Grumpy Feb 2014 #13
Really? Renew Deal Feb 2014 #16
I'll try to remember you said that in about 8 days. Luminous Animal Feb 2014 #14
That's heartless Renew Deal Feb 2014 #15
This is where you lose most everyone LiberalLovinLug Feb 2014 #20
He ***was*** a journalist. Not anymore Renew Deal Feb 2014 #23
Yes. Go back to to occasional articles of interest which of course means publishing near every day.. Luminous Animal Feb 2014 #28
"Manning wasn't a journalist." - Luminous Animal 2014 joshcryer Feb 2014 #33
Read it and weep. Luminous Animal Feb 2014 #39
Oops... Luminous Animal Feb 2014 #41
Of course he should publish his findings and stories...... DeSwiss Feb 2014 #35
I figured "The Intercept" was sort of a clue to the intended content. bemildred Feb 2014 #37
only people you like can make a living? yurbud Feb 2014 #42
!!! oh shit! dionysus Apr 2014 #48
Kind of thin on content so far Blue_Tires Feb 2014 #9
Well, yeah, but we know they have lots of material to work with. nt bemildred Feb 2014 #19
Looking for your insightful critique of the article. Luminous Animal Feb 2014 #30
More power to 'em. Comrade Grumpy Feb 2014 #12
I give it six months. OilemFirchen Feb 2014 #21
We'll see... Blue_Tires Feb 2014 #36
Oh great...Greenwad, The Narcissist, needs more attention to his ego. SoapBox Feb 2014 #22
LOL, Greenwald has the cool, calm temperament, & unbiased opinion needed to professionally lead a FSogol Feb 2014 #40
Kick n/t bobthedrummer Apr 2014 #43
Why the necro? Blue_Tires Apr 2014 #44
This is NOT LBN. Lars28 Apr 2014 #45
Any poster can kick any post at any time. That seems to be what happened here. nt bemildred Apr 2014 #46
Again? Is this a second-chance offer ucrdem Apr 2014 #47
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Greenwald debuts Omidyar-...»Reply #39