Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

fascisthunter

(29,381 posts)

4. Well, any other means of creating power is more than welcome

Reply to minavasht (Reply #3)

Sun Mar 11, 2012, 11:05 PM

Mar 2012

Over time we will need to adapt to safer means of providing energy. Over time, their will be advancements in how power if garnered. I do not expect things to change overnight, but I damn well demand we start some transition to safer and cleaner means of harvesting power.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Anti-nuclear human chain to link 200 kms between Lyon and Avignon [View all] bananas Mar 2012 OP

I'll bet the American media is non-stop with this story... Scuba Mar 2012 #1

Bottom line: Wind is cheaper, even before you factor in the next nuclear disaster. grahamhgreen Mar 2012 #2

France gets 75% of their electricity from nuclear plants minavasht Mar 2012 #3

Well, any other means of creating power is more than welcome fascisthunter Mar 2012 #4

Do you think minavasht Mar 2012 #5

...do you not want to see us transition to... fascisthunter Mar 2012 #6

What will you do when the uranium runs out? And isn't that the same amount of land laid barren by grahamhgreen Mar 2012 #7