Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

WinkyDink

(51,311 posts)

5. This is NOT good. It is, IMO, merely the mirror image of refusing to serve gays or alcohol-buyers or

Reply to onehandle (Original post)

Tue Feb 25, 2014, 11:08 AM

Feb 2014

being exempt from aspects of the ACA because of personal beliefs.

That is to say, if one wants to practice civil disobedience, go for it! But then quit your job.

BTW, I am 100% on the side of abolishing discriminatory laws. I AM a Democrat. Just not an ad hoc one.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

State lawyers don't have to defend gay marriage bans: Holder [View all] onehandle Feb 2014 OP

Holder defended federal bans on equal marriage until Obama told him to stop. merrily Feb 2014 #1

K&R !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! n/t RKP5637 Feb 2014 #2

But Wisconsin AG J.B. Van Hollen says persecuting gays is important legal work ... Scuba Feb 2014 #3

what laws should federal/state administrations defend? alc Feb 2014 #4

This is NOT good. It is, IMO, merely the mirror image of refusing to serve gays or alcohol-buyers or WinkyDink Feb 2014 #5