Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bucky

(55,334 posts)
30. Interesting distinction
Wed Dec 21, 2011, 06:30 PM
Dec 2011

I would argue that punishment isn't vengeance. There are people who are only looking for revenge, who are thus only operating out of emotional reaction to the horrors of any particular crime. I can't agree with them ever. Justice needs to be dispassionate. But neither do I think that the only purpose of prison can be reformation. It's a nice idea and it absolutely needs to be in the mix of what happens to an individual while they are incarcerated--and to far more of an extent than what happens now. But the main purpose should be to mete out impartial punishment, to physically restrain the freedom they've abused by victimizing others.

Drug offenders, of course, are better suited for the reform end of the spectrum. They need to be sobered up and most don't need to be incarcerated at all. But then, this thread isn't about the idiocy of the War on Drugs. From what I get from my friends who've actually worked in the prison system, inmates in for violent and property crimes aren't a good population for trying to actualize the "perfectibility of man" on. There's a kind of sociopathy that goes on in the head when someone decides they can shoot or rob someone else and that kind of thinking takes time to be unprogrammed. But the harm to society outside of the actual loss of life, limb, or property also demands a punishment. People who make society less civilized should lose some of the benefits of society.

This is what we mean by paying a debt to society. I don't think this is at odds with the view that criminals should be reformed, but it is a separate consideration. I can see how it seems arbitrary, of course, but a 13 year old who murders a 14 year old shouldn't be allowed to walk on the streets until he's in his 30s. In that mean time, he probably ought to go through a whole lot of re-education.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Wow. Gee, sure hope that hatred was worth it. HughBeaumont Dec 2011 #1
I wonder how much of his hate was learnt from home Blue_Tires Dec 2011 #2
A lot of it. I live in Oxnard and.... arbusto_baboso Dec 2011 #26
Thanks for the insight... Blue_Tires Dec 2011 #29
Ugh. The kid was doomed then. tblue Dec 2011 #32
What is truly sad about this Versailles Dec 2011 #3
Could go another way. hang a left Dec 2011 #4
Just out of curiosity, enlightenment Dec 2011 #5
Because he was 14 at the time of the crime. hang a left Dec 2011 #19
His hatred of gay will make it very prominent in his life Mr. Sinister Dec 2011 #6
'Prison rape' is not the same as 'gay sex' Cal Carpenter Dec 2011 #7
of course Mr. Sinister Dec 2011 #10
Contrary to common snickering ignorance, prison is not one running rape-orgy Bucky Dec 2011 #27
I wasn't trying to laugh at this misguided child's misfortune Mr. Sinister Dec 2011 #33
And to reiterate my previous point Mr. Sinister Dec 2011 #34
There have been quite a few prison rape jokes on DU over the yrs and most posters don't like them uppityperson Dec 2011 #37
Thank you for asking instead of assuming Mr. Sinister Dec 2011 #38
Why should a 14 year old serve 17 years in prison? joeglow3 Dec 2011 #8
because he killed another kid on purpose and was old enough to know that isn't ok JI7 Dec 2011 #9
What age is that line crossed? joeglow3 Dec 2011 #14
i don't know, but once in the teens for sure JI7 Dec 2011 #17
So, death penalty for a 13 year old is no worse than for a 30 year old? joeglow3 Dec 2011 #18
i don't support the death penalty, i'm talking life in prison or more years . at the very least the JI7 Dec 2011 #20
There's a deep schism among Democrats as to the purpose of prison. Xithras Dec 2011 #11
A question for you. LiberalAndProud Dec 2011 #12
Question for you joeglow3 Dec 2011 #13
"If it is because of nature, how can you punish them?" Are you arguing for absolute arnarchy? LiberalAndProud Dec 2011 #15
A third purpose of incarceration thucythucy Dec 2011 #16
We could kind of tell which side you were on when you used words like 'narrower view', 'merely Shoe Horn Dec 2011 #23
Interesting distinction Bucky Dec 2011 #30
I notice not one word about the murdered victim or his survivors.. MicaelS Dec 2011 #35
It's usually the right that claims that if you empathize with an offender EFerrari Dec 2011 #39
Because sentencing is not all about the criminal, it's also about the victim's sense of justice... Shoe Horn Dec 2011 #22
Actually, 17 is pretty light for premeditated murder Blue_Tires Dec 2011 #24
unless... Bucky Dec 2011 #31
There's a reason we have separate juvenile and adult justice systems mainer Dec 2011 #25
agree. There is a reason why we have age of consent laws for sex. There is a reason why a 14-y/o Douglas Carpenter Dec 2011 #28
Only 21 years ? n/t UndertheOcean Dec 2011 #21
How pathetic. mactime Dec 2011 #36
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Teen gets 21 years in pri...»Reply #30