Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Treant

(1,968 posts)

8. Nice Try

Reply to msongs (Reply #5)

Wed Mar 5, 2014, 03:07 PM

Mar 2014

Propylene glycol, vegetable glycerine, flavoring (various; mine is menthol and cinnamon) (optional), and pharmaceutical grade nicotine (optional).

None class as toxins in the amounts generated in a sealed chamber over several hours to the primary user. Secondhand vapor simply doesn't apply.

Alternately, I have a problem with you spewing that formaldehyde out of you every time you breathe. Do that in your own home, but don't expose me to your toxins.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

33 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Los Angeles moves to ban e-cigarettes, joining NY, others [View all] onehandle Mar 2014 OP

Is this the tobacco lobby at work? More faux smoking = less tobacco smoking. nt valerief Mar 2014 #1

Two major tobacco companies bought e-cigarette companies. onehandle Mar 2014 #3

Taxes Treant Mar 2014 #7

A desperate ploy to try and maintain tax income on regular cigs DJ13 Mar 2014 #2

alternatively, allowing non-vapers to enjoy air without "vapers" spewing toxins nt msongs Mar 2014 #5

What "toxins"? DJ13 Mar 2014 #6

Nice Try Treant Mar 2014 #8

I for one, love it when ignorance rears its ugly head. MyNameGoesHere Mar 2014 #21

I would love to see some research on the toxins being spewed by e-cigs... Comrade Grumpy Mar 2014 #22

This is RIDICULOUS. The reason for the smoke ban was because of 2nd hand smoke. BlueCaliDem Mar 2014 #4

Ban a device that helps you quit smoking because it will lead you to start smoking instead? uppityperson Mar 2014 #9

Like a bunch of fucking creationists gone wild. Stupid, ignorant bigots. n/t jtuck004 Mar 2014 #10

Deserves a repeat - Stupid ignorant bigots like a bunch of fucking creationists gone wild. nt Doremus Mar 2014 #14

Oh My bpj62 Mar 2014 #11

As a former 3-pack a day smoker of 35 years, I know there is a need. Doremus Mar 2014 #15

Authoritarian Legislation bpj62 Mar 2014 #17

"Either smoke the real thing or don't bother." Omg, where to start? Demit Mar 2014 #26

Who gives a shit about need Travis_0004 Mar 2014 #29

Effect of an electronic nicotine delivery device (e-Cigarette) on smoking reduction and cessation: jtuck004 Mar 2014 #12

It wouldn't matter if a study came out tomorrow that JoeyT Mar 2014 #13

At first I was happy when a guy sitting two cubicles away at work said he was going to smoke an DesertDiamond Mar 2014 #16

You should go see a doctor.... beaglelover Mar 2014 #18

many times all it takes is the knowledge something is present Skittles Mar 2014 #31

There's a name for that, actually. Enraged_Ape Mar 2014 #33

I was terribly unhappy when the person next to me started. They took the wrapper off and threw it jtuck004 Mar 2014 #19

Do you have similar reactions in high humidity locales? Doremus Mar 2014 #20

He wouldn't have said he was going to "smoke" an e-cigarette. Demit Mar 2014 #24

Baloney Jersey Devil Mar 2014 #27

I do not use an e-cig C0RYH0FFMAN Mar 2014 #23

The REAL reason why people don't want ecigs used around them Jersey Devil Mar 2014 #25

My office is right next to somebody who uses E-cigs Travis_0004 Mar 2014 #30

I get a lot of that too Jersey Devil Mar 2014 #32

OMG, 'cause e-cigarettes are so harmful! liberalmuse Mar 2014 #28