Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

happyslug

(14,779 posts)
103. Those wheat shipments lead to other things.
Fri Mar 7, 2014, 01:54 AM
Mar 2014

In 1815 Mount Tarbora exploded in the East Indies. This threw so much dirt into the air that 1816 became known as the year without a summer:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Year_Without_a_Summer

Prior to 1816 the primary food crop planted by most farmers was Corn (referred to as "Maize" in England). Those farmers in New England that planted Wheat in 1816 was able to get that crop in before the early frost. Those farmers that planted corn, saw they crop killed by frost. You had massive famine in New England (and elsewhere). It was hard on the poorer elements in New England, but the fish industry still provided food and food could be imported from Pennsylvania and the South, but it was expensive.

This started the switch from Corn to Wheat in the US. New Englanders took this policy with them Westward into the northern areas of the American mid-west and started what by 1900 was the massive wheat fields of the Great Plains.

Yes, British intervention into Spain in 1808 (which lasted to 1814) started the switch to wheat, a crop that saved many a New Englander's life in 1816.

I can not find a source, but Potatoes are known to survive frost and colder weather better then most other crops. Potatoes were well known to Americans prior to the Revolution, but the main crop remain Corn. I suspect that since Potatoes survived 1816 better then corn, Potatoes planting expanded after 1816, but then dropped after the potato blight of the 1830s (the same blight that hit Ireland hard). Please note the Potato crop in Ireland FAILED in 1816, it became to wet, but revived the following year till the blight hit. The blight was a bigger hit for it affect the Irish over many years, not just one growing season.

The massive crop failure is also believed to have convinced more New Englanders to move West. I can see a family, do to food shortages seeing their grand parents die early and maybe one or two children. Staying would bring back to many bad memories so the family decided to move west.

Those farmers that had planted Wheat did not come under such pressure, they had enough to eat and feed their families.

Just pointing out, yes Politics can be Byzantine, but sometimes what happens in one part of the world, ends up affecting another. How could someone think a British move into Spain in 1808 would lead to a massive Internal AMERICAN move from New England to the Mid West in 1817?

http://history1800s.about.com/od/crimesanddisasters/a/The-Year-Without-A-Summer.htm

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

"Scorched Earth" Kutuzov was a "geniune hero"? joshcryer Feb 2014 #1
Your view of history is rather slanted, to say the least! another_liberal Feb 2014 #2
Wow, you are nothing if not flexible... JackRiddler Feb 2014 #3
Scortch Earth was NOT the Russian Policy Against Napoleon, he did that himself.... happyslug Feb 2014 #15
Actually I think you are both right.. EX500rider Feb 2014 #28
This is why DU is so much fun--ya learn something new every day! nt MADem Feb 2014 #79
The Russian campaign is even used as a example on the "Scorched earth" wikki.. EX500rider Feb 2014 #29
I fail to see how War Communism was any different. joshcryer Feb 2014 #49
You're busy helping to stir the ancient bullshit on all fronts, I see. JackRiddler Feb 2014 #69
I'm not the one cheering for secession. joshcryer Feb 2014 #71
You are the one supporting secession, yes. JackRiddler Feb 2014 #72
Russia is the one doing that I'm afraid. joshcryer Feb 2014 #73
Ha, "personal" JackRiddler Feb 2014 #75
Not a win if Russia succeeds in splitting the country up. joshcryer Feb 2014 #77
Statues, not statutes. JackRiddler Mar 2014 #91
I saw nothing unconstitutional. joshcryer Mar 2014 #92
"If someone is offended because symbols of totalitarianism are toppled then I have no sympathy." EX500rider Mar 2014 #93
Thank you! Especially the factoid about the wheat shipments. aquart Mar 2014 #102
Those wheat shipments lead to other things. happyslug Mar 2014 #103
They have a sense of history, of course. JackRiddler Feb 2014 #4
That is some very good writing on your part, my friend. another_liberal Feb 2014 #5
Thank you. JackRiddler Feb 2014 #8
Perhaps they do so due to religious affiliation? another_liberal Feb 2014 #11
Not such a big factor. JackRiddler Feb 2014 #14
"Western Ukraine is largely Greek Catholic (which isn't very much Catholic but recognizes the Pope)" another_liberal Feb 2014 #17
The initials don't have that meaning. JackRiddler Feb 2014 #20
I see. another_liberal Feb 2014 #21
Ukrainian (Greek) Catholics are Catholic. Tommy_Carcetti Feb 2014 #24
Except it's not their country's history. Tommy_Carcetti Feb 2014 #23
Napoleon didn't pass through that place? JackRiddler Feb 2014 #25
You might want to brush up on your history. Tommy_Carcetti Feb 2014 #27
You don't have the chops for this pedantry JackRiddler Feb 2014 #57
Napoleon was trying to restablish Poland muriel_volestrangler Feb 2014 #62
It's not their country's history? Huh?!!!! rdharma Feb 2014 #35
How is a Russian General part of Ukrainian history? n/t EX500rider Feb 2014 #38
Many Seem Unaware, Sir, Czarist Russia, Like Soviet Russia, Was An Empire The Magistrate Feb 2014 #39
But not this part of present-day Ukraine muriel_volestrangler Feb 2014 #40
True, Sir The Magistrate Feb 2014 #42
+1 ... Guess they don't want to be "happy serfs" to a modern day tsar, either..? nt MADem Feb 2014 #80
Yeah, one more reason they aren't fond of Russians. n/t EX500rider Feb 2014 #41
You mean, besides the half of them who are Russians? JackRiddler Feb 2014 #76
Or is it the 17% or so? n/t EX500rider Mar 2014 #94
Languages of the Ukraine: JackRiddler Mar 2014 #95
You mean "Ruthenian" history? Right? rdharma Feb 2014 #44
Turns out many smaller members of Empires weren't fond of the experience. EX500rider Feb 2014 #46
They were known as Ruthenians until the early 1900s. rdharma Feb 2014 #50
Since when does "Ukraine" get a monopoly? JackRiddler Feb 2014 #58
"Half the people there are Russian"...um, no, they aren't Spider Jerusalem Feb 2014 #74
No. It's Russia's history. Tommy_Carcetti Feb 2014 #52
Kind of like British Generals are not part of American colonial history, eh? nt rdharma Feb 2014 #55
Washington of course was a British general. JackRiddler Feb 2014 #59
Along with Col. Washington..... there were a lot of other British officers..... rdharma Feb 2014 #60
Right, sorry: Colonel, of course. JackRiddler Feb 2014 #67
Washington was a key figure in American history. Tommy_Carcetti Feb 2014 #64
He was British because they controlled the colonies. He wasn't born in London, he was born in VA. nt MADem Feb 2014 #81
That analogy would only work if.... Tommy_Carcetti Feb 2014 #63
Brody wasn't part of Ukraine until the end of WW2 muriel_volestrangler Feb 2014 #6
I wonder why then Svoboda felt a need to desecrate the monument . . . another_liberal Feb 2014 #7
Strange to call this 'desecration' muriel_volestrangler Feb 2014 #9
You are . . . another_liberal Feb 2014 #10
Stop with all that common sense!!! EX500rider Feb 2014 #13
I'd say you've summed up the actual situation brilliantly. Very well done! nt MADem Feb 2014 #83
They didn't "desecrate" it. They removed it with a crane. MADem Feb 2014 #82
Brody, eh? rdharma Feb 2014 #36
For comparison: hedgehog Feb 2014 #12
They both triumphed over Napoleon. another_liberal Feb 2014 #19
"their nation." funny, I thought Ukraine not Russia was their nation geek tragedy Feb 2014 #16
I was, of course, referencing "Svoboda." They are totally Ukrainian. another_liberal Feb 2014 #18
Like it or not, Russification is a subject that is going to upset a lot of people. Tommy_Carcetti Feb 2014 #22
"Ukrainians" JackRiddler Feb 2014 #26
I know you want to get all psuedo-philosophical and stuff.... Tommy_Carcetti Feb 2014 #66
I guess I just have a greater sense of gratitude to men like Kutuzov. another_liberal Feb 2014 #31
Gen. Kutuzov never fought any battles on Ukrainian soil? Are you kidding? rdharma Feb 2014 #47
He was a lieutenant colonel then. Tommy_Carcetti Feb 2014 #54
That foot in your mouth uncomfortable? rdharma Feb 2014 #56
Um, no. Tommy_Carcetti Feb 2014 #65
Forget it, "Ukrainian" is a transcendent entity. JackRiddler Feb 2014 #70
It's Ukrainian, not "Ukrainian", you nitwit. Tommy_Carcetti Feb 2014 #90
The crazy thing is that anyone believes... JackRiddler Feb 2014 #68
Why wouldn't the Ukrainians love a statue of a Russian General? EX500rider Feb 2014 #30
I don't really care whether they love it not . . . another_liberal Feb 2014 #32
Sure, sure, who doesn't respect their former genocidal overlords... EX500rider Feb 2014 #33
Kutuzov? another_liberal Feb 2014 #34
"How is he responsible for crimes committed by leaders of the the Soviet Union?" EX500rider Feb 2014 #37
Actually the Israeli Philharmonic has played Wagner . . . another_liberal Feb 2014 #43
After not playing it for 70 years. n/t EX500rider Feb 2014 #45
Some turtles live twice that long. another_liberal Feb 2014 #48
Where did i say I hate Russian's? Oh that's right, nowhere. EX500rider Feb 2014 #51
No one is expecting you to be a fan . . . another_liberal Feb 2014 #53
"Letting ancient animosities die a natural death is more to the point." EX500rider Feb 2014 #61
All true. another_liberal Feb 2014 #86
Well there we go. JackRiddler Mar 2014 #96
You can make up stuff all you want... EX500rider Mar 2014 #97
You know what else is funny? JackRiddler Mar 2014 #98
Yep A lot of them have good reason to not be fond of Germans too. n/t EX500rider Mar 2014 #99
Good grief. That post takes not just the cake, but the entire dessert tray. MADem Feb 2014 #84
I find the framing of the article interesting. Who put the statue up, I wonder? MADem Feb 2014 #78
I tried to find out when that monument was constructed, another_liberal Feb 2014 #85
I looked at the video of the "destruction" of the statue, and there's plainly some "framing" going MADem Feb 2014 #87
"I think they're intending to relocate the thing." another_liberal Feb 2014 #88
If they were intending to get rid of it, it would have been easier to just take a sledgehammer MADem Feb 2014 #89
Destroying statues is a cowardly insult to art. Bill76 Mar 2014 #100
It is a lot to expect Ukrainians to love anything Russian. aquart Mar 2014 #101
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Ukrainian city demolishes...»Reply #103