Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

7962

(11,841 posts)
11. Thats a very good point. After the trains leave, you're supposed to be ok with strangers-
Tue Mar 11, 2014, 01:21 PM
Mar 2014

-wandering across your property? Not these days.
I remember my dad telling me that when he was a kid he and my granddad would walk the banks of a creek and even spend the night. They never even thought of it belonging to someone. But they also never left a mark. Today, that creek has a fence at the right of way and is posted. My uncle, who still lives in the area, said the same family owns the land but people were too often leaving trash or burning tires at night. You know what a mess THAT makes. So they had to fence it off to keep out the slobs

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I suppose this means that moving forward the Feds will have to keep a close eye on such sales ... brett_jv Mar 2014 #1
We DID. elleng Mar 2014 #14
Rails-to-Trails Conservancy's Official Statement on March 2014 Supreme Court Ruling Kolesar Mar 2014 #2
Thanks for providing their discussion. elleng Mar 2014 #15
From the people who brought you Kelo vs. New London . . . hatrack Mar 2014 #3
Not exactly the same people. hughee99 Mar 2014 #9
That ruling was the one that really pissed me off. No way that should be legal. nt 7962 Mar 2014 #10
Sounds reasonable. nt hack89 Mar 2014 #4
Here is the actual opinion happyslug Mar 2014 #5
My grandparents' farm was crossed by a railroad that almost became a trail marshall Mar 2014 #6
Thats a very good point. After the trains leave, you're supposed to be ok with strangers- 7962 Mar 2014 #11
Cyclists don't burn tires on the trail Kolesar Mar 2014 #17
Of course cyclists dont burn tires. I'm merely telling a story of property that I know of. 7962 Mar 2014 #18
Buy homeowner's insurance for that Kolesar Mar 2014 #19
Or, put up No Trespassing signs. CVN-68 Mar 2014 #20
This is a different scenario dbackjon Mar 2014 #12
But it demonstrates how haphazardly the government approached this project marshall Mar 2014 #13
Finally a good decision from the Extreme Court Bandit Mar 2014 #7
You would be wrong... brooklynite Mar 2014 #8
Thanks elleng Mar 2014 #16
Trails are bad. ForgoTheConsequence Mar 2014 #21
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court deals setba...»Reply #11