Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
50. Do we really have a "need to know"?
Fri Mar 14, 2014, 09:33 AM
Mar 2014

What the public knows the hijackers also know.

The less information the hijackers have about what authorities do know, the better.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This is pretty compelling new information.. DCBob Mar 2014 #1
As the debris, and the oil slick, and other information, it may prove untrue, but I thought it worth uppityperson Mar 2014 #2
Well, I tend to believe this one. The US is certainly good at stuff like this. DCBob Mar 2014 #4
Doesn't eliminate the fire possibility. Xithras Mar 2014 #16
possible.. but seems less likely than a hijacking. DCBob Mar 2014 #18
I don't think so. BlueStreak Mar 2014 #31
No, that makes no sense at all Yo_Mama Mar 2014 #35
You didn't explain why a hijacker or terrorist would do it this way BlueStreak Mar 2014 #38
A commercial airliner would be an excellent delivery device for a weapon's system. kristopher Mar 2014 #39
O ...... K ........ BlueStreak Mar 2014 #45
That's actually not true now B2G Mar 2014 #47
What did the hijacker accomplish? BlueStreak Mar 2014 #51
He got a really cool plane. B2G Mar 2014 #52
I love creative use of straw men, misdirection and ability to deftly twist away from the obvious kristopher Mar 2014 #49
Sorry, I misunderstood the plot you were formulating BlueStreak Mar 2014 #53
No, you didn't misunderstand. kristopher Mar 2014 #57
It is a very bizarre sequence of events Yo_Mama Mar 2014 #54
Hijacker does not make sense in my opinion. N/T bobGandolf Mar 2014 #42
nothing really makes "sense" at this point Yo_Mama Mar 2014 #58
Wouldn't a fire that took all of those things out, also destroy the auto pilot mechanisms? freshwest Mar 2014 #29
Yes, eventually. That could be what took it down. Xithras Mar 2014 #60
Yeah but at that point they'd be desperate to contact ATC somewhere for a divert.. EX500rider Mar 2014 #64
Why don't they use sattelites to search for runways that could be... MindMover Mar 2014 #3
airport runways ? JI7 Mar 2014 #5
how much runway does a triple 7 need to land??? MindMover Mar 2014 #7
This says... jtuck004 Mar 2014 #10
They still think it crashed.. somewhere in the Indian ocean. DCBob Mar 2014 #6
I think I'm gonna agree... SoapBox Mar 2014 #13
Or the hijackers could be stupid like the Ethiopian Air hijackers csziggy Mar 2014 #30
Because it's a stupid idea. LeftyMom Mar 2014 #17
maybe they got zapped into that spaceship everyone is talking about MindMover Mar 2014 #37
Because you can't hide a 777 on a runway. Travis_0004 Mar 2014 #23
What's the wing width of a 777? Interstate highways were designed to act as emergency runways. freshwest Mar 2014 #32
The highways desinged as emergency runways was not actually true Travis_0004 Mar 2014 #43
Maybe we haven't heard their demands because they couldn't land where they planned to land. OTOH, freshwest Mar 2014 #44
We see pirates everywhere these days... n/t jtuck004 Mar 2014 #8
She was well used with 53,465 hours & 7525 cycles... EX500rider Mar 2014 #9
And ran into another plane sometime back, with a wing, iirc. jtuck004 Mar 2014 #11
I wonder if the plane may have actually landed somewhere. I don't totodeinhere Mar 2014 #12
You can't hide a 777 very easily. Travis_0004 Mar 2014 #24
That's my suspicion PSPS Mar 2014 #33
If it was planned, maybe somewhere very remote? treestar Mar 2014 #41
KEY WORDS: "There is no exact information yet" pangaia Mar 2014 #14
Those were my words, my editorializing, not the article. It is all very interesting, am thinking uppityperson Mar 2014 #28
be afraid... tk2kewl Mar 2014 #15
I see it more as we don't know, but are trying to pull together whatever we can and now have to uppityperson Mar 2014 #20
Good visual... SoapBox Mar 2014 #25
Thanks for the great visual B2G Mar 2014 #48
"Two U.S. officials" itsrobert Mar 2014 #19
MAS plane did not fly on for four hours, says Malaysia government icymist Mar 2014 #21
Mix of data adds to MH370 confusion uppityperson Mar 2014 #22
Just reading on CNN... SoapBox Mar 2014 #26
Either that or it PROVES that the plane suffered a catastrophioc failure BlueStreak Mar 2014 #27
"missing jet transmitted its location repeatedly to satellites over the course of five hours..." Princess Turandot Mar 2014 #34
If it transmitted its location for 5 hours, then what were the bleeping locations??? muriel_volestrangler Mar 2014 #40
Do we really have a "need to know"? kristopher Mar 2014 #50
Then they shouldn't be saying "it transmitted for 5 hours" muriel_volestrangler Mar 2014 #55
Remember all the confusion and denials? kristopher Mar 2014 #56
"nontraditional" Corgigal Mar 2014 #61
Seems it'd be easier to buy a 2nd hand older plane in Africa somewhere setup as a "Charter airlines" EX500rider Mar 2014 #65
Yup, yet I keep looking and hoping for someting. "Other developments" uppityperson Mar 2014 #59
I like the way Boeing has managed to keep completely silent on all this... countryjake Mar 2014 #63
70 minutes before reported missing to MAS? mackerel Mar 2014 #36
Think this could have been done remotely, through all the computer systems? Sunlei Mar 2014 #46
. snagglepuss Mar 2014 #62
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Malaysia Airliner Communi...»Reply #50