Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

rfranklin

(13,200 posts)
1. ACLJ Files Suit Challenging HHS Mandate for Violating Religious Beliefs of Missouri Business Owner
Thu Mar 15, 2012, 01:41 PM
Mar 2012

This is apparently a one person organizationthat's trying to be the right wing ACLU


ACLJ Files Suit Challenging HHS Mandate for Violating Religious Beliefs of Missouri Business Owner

(Washington, DC) - The American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ), a pro-life legal organization that focuses on constitutional law, today filed a first-of-a-kind federal lawsuit against the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) on behalf of a Missouri business owner who contends the HHS contraceptive mandate violates his constitutionally-protected religious beliefs. The lawsuit also requests that the court issue a permanent injunction prohibiting the HHS from requiring those who have religious objections to abide by the mandate, which requires employers to purchase health insurance for their employees that includes coverage for contraceptives, sterilization, and abortion-inducing drugs.

The ACLJ represents Frank R. O'Brien and O'Brien Industrial Holdings, LLC (OIH) - a holding company based in St. Louis, Missouri. O'Brien is chairman of OIH which operates a number of businesses that explore, mine, and process refractory and ceramic raw materials, with its products going to more than 40 countries.

The lawsuit marks the first legal challenge to the HHS mandate from a private business owner and his company. Until now, only religious organizations or institutions have brought lawsuits challenging the mandate.

"The HHS mandate would require business people like our client to leave their religious beliefs at home every day as a condition of doing business in our society," said Francis J. Manion, Senior Counsel of the ACLJ who is representing O'Brien. "The HHS mandate tells people like Frank O'Brien that they have to choose between conducting their business in a manner consistent with their moral values, or conducting their business in a manner consistent with the government's values. The constitution does not allow the government to impose such a choice."

O'Brien, a Catholic, says his religious beliefs provide the framework for the operation of his businesses, which employ 87 people. The company website states the OIH mission "is to make our labor a pleasing offering to the Lord while enriching our families and society." OIH’s statement of the company's values begins with the following: "Integrity. Our conduct is guided by the Golden Rule and the Ten Commandments. We will not discriminate based on anyone's personal belief system."

O'Brien also has implemented a variety of company-participating programs to assist employees in purchasing homes, saving for the college education of their children, and being able to retire.

The lawsuit contends that the HHS mandate "imposes a substantial burden on Plaintiffs' free exercise of religion by coercing Plaintiffs to choose between conducting their business in accordance with their religious beliefs or paying substantial penalties to the government."

Manion rejects criticism that opposition to the mandate somehow prohibits others from obtaining insurance coverage they desire.

"O'Brien and other people of faith aren't looking to stand in the way of anybody's access to anything," said Manion. "They just don't want the government forcing them to pay for services that go against their sincerely-held beliefs. The State of Missouri has its own 'contraceptives mandate,' but, unlike the Obama Administration's Department of HHS, Missouri respects and protects those employers, like Frank O'Brien, with religious objections. There is no good reason why the federal government couldn't -- and shouldn't - do the same. The Constitution, in fact, demands nothing less."

The lawsuit, posted here, asks the court to declare that the HHS mandate violates the First Amendment, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, and the Administrative Procedure Act. The suit also requests the court to issue a permanent injunction to halt implementation of the HHS mandate for those who have religious objections.

The lawsuit names as defendants, the Department of Health and Human Services and Secretary Sebelius; the Department of the Treasury and Secretary Geithner; and the Department of Labor and Secretary Solis. The ACLJ is being assisted in this lawsuit by the Fidelis Center for Law and Policy, a Chicago-based educational and advocacy group.

Led by ACLJ Chief Counsel Jay Sekulow, the ACLJ is based in Washington, D.C.


http://aclj.org/obamacare/aclj-files-suit-challenging-hhs-mandate-for-violating-religious-beliefs-of-missouri-business-owner

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

ACLJ Files Suit Challenging HHS Mandate for Violating Religious Beliefs of Missouri Business Owner rfranklin Mar 2012 #1
All righty then LibertyLover Mar 2012 #29
ACLJ is Pat Robertson's legal org; lastlib Mar 2012 #2
I was just getting ready to Google that proud2BlibKansan Mar 2012 #4
Looks like a legitimate company proud2BlibKansan Mar 2012 #3
St Louis is a major center for industrial refractories - the hedgehog Mar 2012 #6
How does it violate his religious beliefs? Quantess Mar 2012 #5
Yup. Shadowflash Mar 2012 #12
The mandate says any new plan must provide contraceptive products at no cost .... BOHICA12 Mar 2012 #27
I see your point, but I think it's a matter of perpective Quantess Mar 2012 #31
I'm with you there somewhat .... but BOHICA12 Mar 2012 #32
It is an earning for the employee jmowreader Mar 2012 #52
Bingo. aquart Mar 2012 #34
Their Mission Statement Bonhomme Richard Mar 2012 #7
"Mean spirited behavior will not be tolerated. " Old and In the Way Mar 2012 #11
I was thinking about something similar. Control-Z Mar 2012 #24
Don't forget ongoing pediatric care, too. aquart Mar 2012 #35
We will not discriminate based on anyone's personal belief system" crazylikafox Mar 2012 #13
"We will not discriminate based on anyone's belief system." There it is in a nutshell. They are not jwirr Mar 2012 #14
He left one out bongbong Mar 2012 #22
If he has ONE employee that works on a Sunday, he will lose. Ikonoklast Mar 2012 #8
Good luck with that. Where are the damages? caseymoz Mar 2012 #9
All they can show is more costs loyalsister Mar 2012 #38
I argue with my Dad about this. caseymoz Mar 2012 #39
So can a Jehovah's Witness business owner ban covering transfusions? denverbill Mar 2012 #10
There is nothing to stop a JW employer from excluding blood transfusion coverage from kestrel91316 Mar 2012 #15
To stop the slippery slope? The Supreme Court put limits on religious freedom. 1878 Reynolds v. US Brettongarcia Mar 2012 #20
I should have specified that nothing other than the USSC kestrel91316 Mar 2012 #23
That little nagging voice whispers that the last thing the administration wants to do in an election 24601 Mar 2012 #33
Yeah but, earlier legal precedents, disallowing religious exemptions, don't just include tax cases Brettongarcia Mar 2012 #36
oh no starbucks! greymattermom Mar 2012 #26
There is clear legal precedent stopping this joeglow3 Mar 2012 #30
All organizations accepting government funding/regulation, should obey full federal HHS law Brettongarcia Mar 2012 #37
How about everyone else joeglow3 Mar 2012 #43
Lots of cases do not allow private citizens religious exemption from law Brettongarcia Mar 2012 #45
Apples and Oranges joeglow3 Mar 2012 #50
Does the insurance EC Mar 2012 #16
There is something that has been christx30 Mar 2012 #17
Yeah, I've been thinking about that too. EC Mar 2012 #19
Why is he allowed to know what medications his employees are on? Aerows Mar 2012 #18
plain and simple SemperEadem Mar 2012 #21
...and the rightwing crazies are complaining ... la la Mar 2012 #25
I wonder if the Obama Administration didn't start this issue just for this to happen lunatica Mar 2012 #28
question??? onethatcares Mar 2012 #40
Do you mean to imply that this fine, upstanding gentleman, hedgehog Mar 2012 #41
Guess this guys doesn't do birth control.... SamG Mar 2012 #42
Here is a non right wing source alp227 Mar 2012 #44
Thank you for posting that URL for Conwebwatch. So glad to see it. n/t Judi Lynn Mar 2012 #47
I'm pro choice cstanleytech Mar 2012 #46
Under the Health Care Reform, businesses over a certain size must provide hedgehog Mar 2012 #48
Yes I know that its under that however is it constitutional? After all our government does from time cstanleytech Mar 2012 #49
HEY!!! You know what? I have objections about my taxes being used for bogus wars! KansDem Mar 2012 #51
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Missouri Man Is First Pri...»Reply #1