Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cheapdate

(3,811 posts)
70. Actually, I think Rand Paul is stumping for increased US involvement in Ukraine.
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 12:51 PM
Mar 2014

But, that's the not the issue. As I explained earlier, the issue is that my ability to rapidly come up to speed on politics in Venezuela, Ukraine, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Sudan, Mali, Libya, Syria, etc., etc., etc., has about reached its limit.

I'd love it if US foreign policy in Ukraine was as you said, a neutral effort to help the two sides find a solution. But that's not reality. The reality is that US policy is not neutral. We've chosen a side, which as it turns out, is a side whose leadership is populated by far-right fascists. Our position sets us on a path toward increased long-term conflict and renewed hostility toward Russia. For extra measure, the conflict includes a dispute over the ownership of huge sums of gas revenue.

I'd prefer the US not to get involved in this complicated political dispute. Jimmy Carter involved the US in Nicaraguan and El Salvadoarn politics with the best of intentions. The results were ultimately disatrous and I don't see many ways that US involvement in this dispute in Ukraine could turn out well for either Ukraine or the US.

Fuck Rand Paul. I'm not an isolationist, but I'm not a blind interventionist either.

As you put it to me:

"If you want a policy like that vote for (John McCain) in the next election because that is about what he supports."

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The truly odd part... africanadian Mar 2014 #1
The really odd part is the NATO countries don't consider cprise Mar 2014 #51
The WEIRDEST thing about the vote... Scootaloo Mar 2014 #52
Why are we recognizing the new government in Ukraine, then??? This is so stupid. reformist2 Mar 2014 #2
Do you believe the majority of Ukrainians in the rest of the country want to be part of Russia? penultimate Mar 2014 #6
No, but I believe that the goverment in Ukraine does not represent the majority and that has led to newthinking Mar 2014 #22
I suspected that was Clinton's appointment. arewenotdemo Mar 2014 #27
+1,000,000 n/t cosmicone Mar 2014 #28
+1000! andlor Mar 2014 #67
+1 wisteria Mar 2014 #57
Because we helped pay to get it in there. Over $5 billion. Plus cookies n/t jtuck004 Mar 2014 #10
International Republican Institute and Project for a new American Century newthinking Mar 2014 #19
Great mining for info as always. go west young man Mar 2014 #35
+1000 n/t LarryNM Mar 2014 #40
What? Not 100%? nt JudyM Mar 2014 #3
This! Putin's thugs are slacking. To the Gulag with them! NT Adrahil Mar 2014 #11
Like the vote to oust Yanukovych was? JoeyT Mar 2014 #16
The vote to vote oust Yanukovych was not near unanimous, though.... Adrahil Mar 2014 #50
I think that's what happened here, too. JoeyT Mar 2014 #56
those opposed boycotted. But anyone who knows the cultural makeup of crimea knows newthinking Mar 2014 #20
A miscalculation only if Obama wasn't OK with Ukraine losing Crimea... arewenotdemo Mar 2014 #32
This is my understanding too. djg21 Mar 2014 #74
I'm not especially concerned with politics in Crimea or Ukraine. cheapdate Mar 2014 #4
smart person you are ... n/t cosmicone Mar 2014 #29
Ditto. go west young man Mar 2014 #36
Thank you - I was 840high Mar 2014 #37
+1,000,000! AngryDem001 Mar 2014 #61
It's short sided an naive to take that kind of a stance davidpdx Mar 2014 #64
Actually, I think Rand Paul is stumping for increased US involvement in Ukraine. cheapdate Mar 2014 #70
Sounds like the Russians learned some of justhanginon Mar 2014 #5
Saddam won by more BeyondGeography Mar 2014 #7
The other 7% voted for Ralph Nader Jack for Sanders Mar 2014 #8
LOL NT Adrahil Mar 2014 #12
This vote is less legitimate than Kim Jong-Un's reelection. tarheelsunc Mar 2014 #9
No those weren't the choices. former9thward Mar 2014 #34
Do you have any link jamzrockz Mar 2014 #55
Yes. former9thward Mar 2014 #58
The news report I saw showed two seperate boxes for voters to drop their ballots. Incitatus Mar 2014 #72
Are you getting your information from Fox News? Completely opposite of the facts. 2banon Mar 2014 #75
Turnout would be a more meaningful number, since the opposition boycotted it muriel_volestrangler Mar 2014 #13
Did you notice dipsydoodle Mar 2014 #17
Actually Dipsy we don't use those things anymore. go west young man Mar 2014 #38
Yes I know about your stuff dipsydoodle Mar 2014 #41
Actually I'm from England... go west young man Mar 2014 #44
The highest number I see is 44%: joshcryer Mar 2014 #23
look 840high Mar 2014 #39
Voter turnout was placed at between 75 and 80 percent T. J. Kong Mar 2014 #43
Great first post! go west young man Mar 2014 #45
Thank you "go west young man" for the warm welcome! T. J. Kong Mar 2014 #48
Probably thousands of Russians suddenly became "Crimeans" Adrahil Mar 2014 #66
58% of Crimeans were Russians to start with happyslug Mar 2014 #69
"threats of violence and intimidation <- Like the democracy we bombed Iraq with? jtuck004 Mar 2014 #14
That's right! Iraquis never got to vote on our intrusion. ozone_man Mar 2014 #42
Vladamir Putin is an abomible excuse for a human something is being ignored studiously so in fact azurnoir Mar 2014 #15
If the Crimean parliament had actually organised a fair referendum muriel_volestrangler Mar 2014 #18
so Russian troops forced Crimeans to vote for them? or simply forced the referendum itself ? eta azurnoir Mar 2014 #21
No, the history is not meaningless muriel_volestrangler Mar 2014 #24
as are we in the West being lied to azurnoir Mar 2014 #26
US outlawed entire political parties in Iraq with the threat of imprisonment and violence. Ash_F Mar 2014 #25
You are correct cosmicone Mar 2014 #30
Really. World War II? lostincalifornia Mar 2014 #53
our government has clean hands in WW2. Adam051188 Mar 2014 #54
It wasn't the government it was the industrialists and corporations lostincalifornia Mar 2014 #59
I care about Crimea being allowed to freely chose its own fate bhikkhu Mar 2014 #60
On the other hand jamzrockz Mar 2014 #62
No, it could have easily been a violent mess bhikkhu Mar 2014 #68
Why is it our bussiness who they vote for when in this country bigdarryl Mar 2014 #31
The exit polls are never reliable! AAO Mar 2014 #33
Maybe at 11:55 the system will go down... go west young man Mar 2014 #46
Florida 2000 53.4-43.6% T. J. Kong Mar 2014 #47
I had a sarcasm smiley too! AAO Mar 2014 #71
Who "counted" the votes ?!?! blkmusclmachine Mar 2014 #49
Well it wasn't Diebold dipsydoodle Mar 2014 #65
93% of Crimea Votes to Join Russia.... DeSwiss Mar 2014 #63
“You can’t conduct a democratic referendum when a whole country is invaded and controlled by the.. Cha Mar 2014 #73
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»93% of Crimea Votes to Jo...»Reply #70