Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JohnnyRingo

(20,902 posts)
25. I suggest everyone read the entire article.
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 01:08 PM
Mar 2014

The plot deepens greatly as we learn that the oil, which was property of the Libyan govt, was offered for sale by the rebel pirates. Potential customers included a couple Israelis who flew in on a private jet and took a motor launch to negotiate a deal on board the tanker. The duo, along with another national accomplice, remain in custody in a country where one absolutely doesn't want to find themselves incarcerated.

This is another act of international piracy personally foiled by our president's signature. There were no casualties. Apparently, the crack teams of Navy Seals have gained a reputation that now raises the white flag of surrender on sight. Thank goodness for that, because even though his part in neutering this plot will go totally unrecognized by the GOP, even a minor flesh wound of a US special ops soldier would raise screams for impeachment from the usual sources.

For those here who don't understand why we would be involved in this matter, we have to understand that when we left the gold standard back in the late '60s, our money began being backed by barrels of oil. Before any country can buy crude, they have to convert their currency to what has become known as the Petrodollar. If the flow of oil about the globe becomes hindered in any way, our economy is severely at stake. That's why we're the only country on Earth that needs (or has) nuclear aircraft carriers. Penny ante privateers should not, and can not, be a factor in what that $50 in your pocket can buy in the 21st century.

Like it or not, our individual standard of living is wholly dependent upon standing waist deep in oily crude. We're all Clampetts now.

Any change in how we back our currency will take figuratively as long as the time it takes to turn around a fully laden supertanker, and even then, what can we use to represent the value of our greenbacks? The only thing we seem to have an abundantly reliable national supply of is political hot air and football games. Perhaps the answer for the future of our economy is food. We have the ability to grow a lot of corn and wheat, and everyone on the planet has a need for it in one form or another.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It was called a "North Korean" tanker when the news first broke. Interesting change. nt Democracyinkind Mar 2014 #1
Was that due to the flag flown at the time ? dipsydoodle Mar 2014 #4
Interesting. Thank you. nt Democracyinkind Mar 2014 #6
Wise, given its ship caught in Panama. joshcryer Mar 2014 #7
I'm not sure I like this MyNameGoesHere Mar 2014 #2
"Three armed Libyans" aren't manning an oil shipment. joshcryer Mar 2014 #5
It is still not our problem. MyNameGoesHere Mar 2014 #11
Idiotic comment. Libya doesn't have SEALS and geek tragedy Mar 2014 #13
I appreciate your use of "idiotic" MyNameGoesHere Mar 2014 #15
Well, see, democracies have this thing. joshcryer Mar 2014 #17
Yes and this happened where? MyNameGoesHere Mar 2014 #22
Why SEALs? ManiacJoe Mar 2014 #30
So is the Coast Guard. MyNameGoesHere Mar 2014 #31
You're kidding, right? ManiacJoe Mar 2014 #32
no are you? MyNameGoesHere Mar 2014 #33
We may be talking about different definitions of boarding. ManiacJoe Mar 2014 #34
The Coast Guard are not trained to board ships that are considered high risk, uncommonlink Mar 2014 #35
Zeidan's ouster represents a sea change in Libya. joshcryer Mar 2014 #3
While Ibrahim Jedram might be a crypto-islamist, I'm not sure that ALL of the eastern militias... Democracyinkind Mar 2014 #9
I can't disagree. joshcryer Mar 2014 #10
To quote Powell:"If you break it, you own it" /nt jakeXT Mar 2014 #8
Ah yes ctsnowman Mar 2014 #12
Why is OUR navy being used for Le Taz Hot Mar 2014 #14
North Korea is under sanctions. joshcryer Mar 2014 #18
so what country exactly hired 'someone' in the harbor to load their rented tanker with crude? Sunlei Mar 2014 #16
ok, another story said it was a North Korea flagged tanker that was stealing the crude. Sunlei Mar 2014 #21
Great job by loss prevention jsr Mar 2014 #19
Wanna bet we suddenly see some Benghazi suspects taken into custody? farmbo Mar 2014 #20
Isn't that a movie plot? rickyhall Mar 2014 #23
Inquiring minds want to know packman Mar 2014 #24
I suggest everyone read the entire article. JohnnyRingo Mar 2014 #25
Some countries completely bypass the petrodollar dipsydoodle Mar 2014 #26
That's an interesting article JohnnyRingo Mar 2014 #27
Mention of Iraq dipsydoodle Mar 2014 #28
I recall the "Saddam switching to Euro" as a potential reason JohnnyRingo Mar 2014 #29
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Navy Seals take over oil ...»Reply #25