Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
26. Some countries completely bypass the petrodollar
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 01:13 PM
Mar 2014

The petrodollar recycling system is a scam anyway.

Plenty of links to the subject. Example here :

The theory of Petrodollar Warfare can be attributed to US analyst and author William R Clarke, and his 2005 book of that title which interpreted the US-UK decision to invade Iraq in 2003. He called this an "oil currency war", but the concept of the petrodollar system and petrodollar recyling dates back to the eve of the first Oil Shock in 1973-1974. The role of the petrodollar system as a driving force of US foreign policy is explained by analysts and historians as basic to maintaining the dollar's status as the world's dominant reserve currency - and the currency in which oil is priced.

The term "petrodollar warfare" as used by William R. Clark says that major international war, legal or not, was seen as justified to protect the petrodollar system. Over and above the loss of human life, the combined costs of the Afghan and Iraq wars for the US are controversial like the interpretation of these wars as "oil wars", but analysts like Joseph Stiglitz and Linda Bilmes put the total combined war cost at above $4 trillion. This can be compared with - and totally dwarfs - the annual cost of US oil imports, which are now sharply declining on a year-in year-out basis as domestic shale oil output ramps up, and US oil demand stagnates.

Clarke's theory, like the explanation of the role and power of the "petrodollar system" depends on two basic drivers. Most major developed countries rely on oil imports, which are purchased using dollars, so they are forced to hold large stockpiles of dollars in order to continue importing oil. In turn this also creates consistent demand for dollars, and prevents the dollar from losing its relative international monetary value, regardless of what happens to the US economy.

Variants of the Petrodollar War concept include the role of oil currency conflicts and rivalry, notably concerning US relations with Iran, Venezuela and Russia, and possibly with Europe concerning the gradual replacement of US dollars with the euro, for oil transactions. More important, the entire petromoney system and the potential for Petrodollar War hinges on global oil import demand and the oil price. Both of these have to hold up. When or if they do not, foreign oil importer nations who formerly found it beneficial to hold dollars to pay for oil, would have to find some other (unexplained) reason for huge holdings of dollars, when their oil imports decline and-or oil prices also decline.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-05-20/guest-post-coming-collapse-petrodollar-system

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It was called a "North Korean" tanker when the news first broke. Interesting change. nt Democracyinkind Mar 2014 #1
Was that due to the flag flown at the time ? dipsydoodle Mar 2014 #4
Interesting. Thank you. nt Democracyinkind Mar 2014 #6
Wise, given its ship caught in Panama. joshcryer Mar 2014 #7
I'm not sure I like this MyNameGoesHere Mar 2014 #2
"Three armed Libyans" aren't manning an oil shipment. joshcryer Mar 2014 #5
It is still not our problem. MyNameGoesHere Mar 2014 #11
Idiotic comment. Libya doesn't have SEALS and geek tragedy Mar 2014 #13
I appreciate your use of "idiotic" MyNameGoesHere Mar 2014 #15
Well, see, democracies have this thing. joshcryer Mar 2014 #17
Yes and this happened where? MyNameGoesHere Mar 2014 #22
Why SEALs? ManiacJoe Mar 2014 #30
So is the Coast Guard. MyNameGoesHere Mar 2014 #31
You're kidding, right? ManiacJoe Mar 2014 #32
no are you? MyNameGoesHere Mar 2014 #33
We may be talking about different definitions of boarding. ManiacJoe Mar 2014 #34
The Coast Guard are not trained to board ships that are considered high risk, uncommonlink Mar 2014 #35
Zeidan's ouster represents a sea change in Libya. joshcryer Mar 2014 #3
While Ibrahim Jedram might be a crypto-islamist, I'm not sure that ALL of the eastern militias... Democracyinkind Mar 2014 #9
I can't disagree. joshcryer Mar 2014 #10
To quote Powell:"If you break it, you own it" /nt jakeXT Mar 2014 #8
Ah yes ctsnowman Mar 2014 #12
Why is OUR navy being used for Le Taz Hot Mar 2014 #14
North Korea is under sanctions. joshcryer Mar 2014 #18
so what country exactly hired 'someone' in the harbor to load their rented tanker with crude? Sunlei Mar 2014 #16
ok, another story said it was a North Korea flagged tanker that was stealing the crude. Sunlei Mar 2014 #21
Great job by loss prevention jsr Mar 2014 #19
Wanna bet we suddenly see some Benghazi suspects taken into custody? farmbo Mar 2014 #20
Isn't that a movie plot? rickyhall Mar 2014 #23
Inquiring minds want to know packman Mar 2014 #24
I suggest everyone read the entire article. JohnnyRingo Mar 2014 #25
Some countries completely bypass the petrodollar dipsydoodle Mar 2014 #26
That's an interesting article JohnnyRingo Mar 2014 #27
Mention of Iraq dipsydoodle Mar 2014 #28
I recall the "Saddam switching to Euro" as a potential reason JohnnyRingo Mar 2014 #29
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Navy Seals take over oil ...»Reply #26