Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

eallen

(2,981 posts)
20. How much does Viacom spend each election cycle on "The Daily Show"?
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 05:21 PM
Mar 2014

I bet it exceeds $3.5 million. Should both it and "The Colbert Report" be removed from the air during the 2014 election cycle?

Therein lies the problem with Burt Neuborne's argument. If taken seriously, we would have to make the media dark for the months preceding an election. No step in that direction will pass SCOTUS muster.

I suspect the lawyers arguing for the FEC are making a better argument, to wit, that there is an valid legal distinction between a) a corporation or individual spending money on making and publishing their own speech, and b) someone donating to organizations for political purpose during an election cycle. Admittedly, that's not as bright a line as would be ideal, either. Where does a crowd-sourced project fall? But it at least gives the courts some legal basis for supporting contribution limits without having to rewrite the 1st amendment.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Wow...Good to see some people waking up to it.... Blue_Tires Mar 2014 #1
K&R!!! They shouldn't stop there! Let's get the corporations all the way out of it. Dustlawyer Mar 2014 #2
+1. nt bemildred Mar 2014 #3
+1 nt JudyM Mar 2014 #4
Yay! shenmue Mar 2014 #5
Is Marlborough among them? KamaAina Mar 2014 #6
I do not know NHLabor Mar 2014 #7
Here is the list NHLabor Mar 2014 #9
I'm still with the ACLU on this one... eallen Mar 2014 #8
+1 n/t X_Digger Mar 2014 #11
Corporations are not people; Money is not speech. graegoyle Mar 2014 #12
No, but "the press" includes corporations: NYT, MSNBC, etc. eallen Mar 2014 #14
Pouring money (much of it untraceable) into any and all elections is not speech, period Doctor_J Mar 2014 #15
So, how exactly do you want to restrict press freedom? eallen Mar 2014 #16
Why the ACLU Is Wrong About 'Citizens United' Zorra Mar 2014 #17
Different legal issue. I hope SCOTUS upholds the FEC in McCutcheon eallen Mar 2014 #18
The argument used in the article may be applied to both CU and McCutcheon. Zorra Mar 2014 #19
How much does Viacom spend each election cycle on "The Daily Show"? eallen Mar 2014 #20
It would pass muster if we had one more sane justice on the SCOTUS bench. nt Zorra Mar 2014 #22
I am sure Larry Clayman or some other doofus will sue and eventually SCOTUS will overturn Doctor_J Mar 2014 #10
And Scott Brown thinks that he can win? (nt) question everything Mar 2014 #13
excellent Berlum Mar 2014 #21
MoveToAmend is working on this nationally Agony Mar 2014 #23
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»30 New Hampshire Towns Ha...»Reply #20