Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Maldives residents saw 'low-flying jumbo jet' on March 8: report [View all]telecat
(14 posts)47. There was no foul play
There is no reason to suspect foul play. I like the one rational writer I've seen on this subject, suggest an electrical failure and the turn everyone is so apoplectic about, was actually toward the closest airstrip capable of handling a 777.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
79 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Maybe because we're talking about a remote, tiny island in the Indian Ocean west of India?
hedgehog
Mar 2014
#3
don't understand why none of the passengers used their cell phone at that moment.
Sunlei
Mar 2014
#2
Thanks. I was also considering "mahl-DEE-vehs", as if Spanish, but I'll take your
TwilightGardener
Mar 2014
#18
Diego Garcia and 5 other nearby runways were found on one of the pilot's simulators
magical thyme
Mar 2014
#15
Used to see Flying Fortresses fly low over my place between Central TX and the Panhandle.
freshwest
Mar 2014
#42
I read a comment somewhere else stating they were patent holders, but the article said not true.
magical thyme
Mar 2014
#26
Of course, none of these "witnesses" bothered to take a picture with their cell phone
BlueStreak
Mar 2014
#43