Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

JackRiddler

(24,979 posts)
51. I know, you don't want to get it.
Wed Mar 19, 2014, 01:32 PM
Mar 2014

In 1994, the Hutu Power militias did most of the killing (not "Hutus&quot , but possibly the conditions for the genocide wouldn't have occurred in the first place if not for -military! - intervention in Rwandan affairs by two Western powers acting out of their perceived geostrategic interests (which is the only reason the motherfuckers in power ever act, even when they do the occasional good thing during a natural disaster because for reasons of PR).

And the direct intervention by French troops in support of the genocidaires (read that, damn it!) was not PRIOR, it was DURING. They were there! How can you discuss the theoretical bullshit about what the West could have done while ignoring what the West actually did? There was a Western intervention during the genocide, and it illustrates perfectly what's wrong with intervention.

The rest of your rant is standard neo-con war-lovers' American century boilerplate. There's always a reason -- many reasons! -- for the U.S. to spend a trillion dollars on the military (not enough! too low!!! alert alert!) and intervene militarily everywhere in the world.

Or else: Hitler!!!

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Total insanity Everything's going according to plan. Neos pissing in their shorts from joy n/t Catherina Mar 2014 #1
Umm, "insanity" is pretty good. fleabiscuit Mar 2014 #14
‘Batshit ludicrous bullshit.’ coldbeer Mar 2014 #23
I smell money... TeeYiYi Mar 2014 #16
This one was easy too, just dust off all the old stuff Catherina Mar 2014 #35
Russia really shouldn't have mentioned the "Russians" in Latvia. That was TwilightGardener Mar 2014 #2
Yep, oopsie on that. geek tragedy Mar 2014 #5
There is alway money for the Military bahrbearian Mar 2014 #3
Russia has routinely tried to bully the Baltic states since they escaped its leash geek tragedy Mar 2014 #4
I believe this would be a good thing. Russia has a large, but hollow military. Mostly conscripts. 7962 Mar 2014 #6
Why WE? pangaia Mar 2014 #22
That was tried twice before. CFLDem Mar 2014 #29
...^ that 840high Mar 2014 #34
Because its high time we realize no one will do ANYTHING if we're not involved. Look at the Balkans 7962 Mar 2014 #36
I agree with you. pangaia Mar 2014 #43
The U.S. and France both intervened in Rwanda. JackRiddler Mar 2014 #46
My comment mentioned Clinton mentioning not intervening in 94 as his biggest regret. 7962 Mar 2014 #47
Right, and Clinton is lying. JackRiddler Mar 2014 #48
PRIOR is the key word. The US or Europe couldve stopped what was going on by simply showing up. 7962 Mar 2014 #50
I know, you don't want to get it. JackRiddler Mar 2014 #51
Yes, I'm a neocon. I didnt know neocons could think the Iraq war was a crime. 7962 Mar 2014 #56
I didn't say you were a neocon. JackRiddler Mar 2014 #58
Well, that didnt take long 7962 Mar 2014 #57
Successfully provoked. Congrats. JackRiddler Mar 2014 #59
You sure you shouldnt be over at "Infowars"? 7962 Mar 2014 #61
With a bunch of right-wing American nationalists? JackRiddler Mar 2014 #62
ya, poor widdle innocent Russia has been provoked into threatening an invasion of geek tragedy Mar 2014 #66
Paranoia on both sides Lurks Often Mar 2014 #7
See, if Russia hadn't of christx30 Mar 2014 #9
^^^^^^This! 7962 Mar 2014 #11
Yeah, but... TeeYiYi Mar 2014 #13
Good point, actually. christx30 Mar 2014 #15
George Bush was afraid of horses. Octafish Mar 2014 #45
John Wayne was afraid of horses too red dog 1 Mar 2014 #54
He loves horses; but hates reporters, especially those who disagree with him red dog 1 Mar 2014 #53
Tensions escalating with Russia and US at same time that plane is missing? epona Mar 2014 #8
Post Hoc Ergo Proper Hoc MineralMan Mar 2014 #12
Actually, it means 'after this therefore because of this.' Holbrook22 Mar 2014 #28
Consider it a contextually-driven translation. n/t Igel Mar 2014 #30
Yes, I'm aware of that. MineralMan Mar 2014 #49
+100 nt okaawhatever Mar 2014 #10
Oh No!!! This will make Putin wet his pants cosmicone Mar 2014 #17
No, but Berlin Expat Mar 2014 #18
the announcement isn't supposed to scare him, just remind him geek tragedy Mar 2014 #19
Yep....it needs Berlin Expat Mar 2014 #20
Putin needs to be scared of f#$#king with NATO. That's why he won't touch Estonia unless okaawhatever Mar 2014 #68
Oh, joy! The Military Industrial Complex LOVES "sword rattling"...... rdharma Mar 2014 #21
given that the Russians/USSR in the past conscripted people from the Baltics geek tragedy Mar 2014 #27
Keep up with the nonsense....... rdharma Mar 2014 #31
The past is never dead, it's not even past. nt geek tragedy Mar 2014 #32
To your time machine, Mr. Peabody! nt rdharma Mar 2014 #33
LOL! n/t bitchkitty Mar 2014 #52
"Russia" still has mandatory military conscription. Same thing regardless of how you name them. nt 7962 Mar 2014 #37
I never claimed that Russia DIDN'T have military conscription. rdharma Mar 2014 #38
You made such a deal about Soviet Union vs Russia. You dont think they'll be Crimeans drafted too? 7962 Mar 2014 #39
You need to catch up on the conversation. rdharma Mar 2014 #40
Yes, your response to reply#27, who points out that these countries have every reason to fear Russia 7962 Mar 2014 #41
Sorry... but post #27 is pure BS! rdharma Mar 2014 #42
Nice diplomatic strategy... Earth_First Mar 2014 #24
The RW nuts want confrontation........ rdharma Mar 2014 #25
Seems that there are RW DU nuts as well gearing for war - n/t mazzarro Mar 2014 #44
Got tired of Snowden? JackRiddler Mar 2014 #60
Flat out falsehood. joshcryer Mar 2014 #63
2003? You betcha. JackRiddler Mar 2014 #64
Link a post? joshcryer Mar 2014 #65
We'll have to differ in our recollections. JackRiddler Mar 2014 #67
I don't have faith in flexing military muscle to solve problems. lumpy Mar 2014 #26
K&R...Thanks for posting red dog 1 Mar 2014 #55
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»US ponders military exerc...»Reply #51