Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
16. If this was the southern route, that gives creat creibility to the oil rig worker's report
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 12:34 AM
Mar 2014

and he said ir saw what looked like a plane on fire. The pilots tried to turn it around to land back in Malaysia and they were overcome. I guess there could be a little comfort knowing that the passengers were probably all killed by the smoke early on and didn't have to sit through 6 horrific hours knowing they were going to crash into the sea.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Hijacking a plane to Antarctica makes zero sense. n/t lumberjack_jeff Mar 2014 #1
Strong chance it wasn't hijacked. tinrobot Mar 2014 #7
A southern route can only be equipment failure or suicidal pilot BlueStreak Mar 2014 #15
Unless.... Spitfire of ATJ Mar 2014 #24
This message was self-deleted by its author Th1onein Mar 2014 #33
Heh. +1 n/t lumberjack_jeff Mar 2014 #37
Penghazi !!! Nt pkdu Mar 2014 #52
And the "weirder and weirder" continues. SoapBox Mar 2014 #2
Perhaps he was purposefully guiding the plane away from any population centers bigworld Mar 2014 #3
Perhaps nobody was driving the bus tinrobot Mar 2014 #8
That makes as much (or maybe more) sense than any other theory right now groundloop Mar 2014 #10
If this was the southern route, that gives creat creibility to the oil rig worker's report BlueStreak Mar 2014 #16
No, the rig worker saw something about 300 miles NE of where the last broadcast was muriel_volestrangler Mar 2014 #32
Those were visual observations and estimates. Not at all inconsistent BlueStreak Mar 2014 #36
There's a lot of difference between 50-70km west, and 500km west-south-west muriel_volestrangler Mar 2014 #38
It couldn't have been very "high up" if he estimated 75 KM away BlueStreak Mar 2014 #41
For a plane 60km away from a man on a 20m high oil rig platform, muriel_volestrangler Mar 2014 #42
It is ambiguous and you should admit that. It was a momentary observation documented 3 days later BlueStreak Mar 2014 #43
No, it's not ambiguous; he gave pretty specific details muriel_volestrangler Mar 2014 #44
That flight path claim was retracted the next day. BlueStreak Mar 2014 #45
That was 12th March, this is the 15th: muriel_volestrangler Mar 2014 #46
But if it turned northwest, it would not have enough fuel to end up off Perth BlueStreak Mar 2014 #49
If the Austrailian search is the actual wreckage, then there probably was no turn to the west BlueStreak Mar 2014 #47
There's nothing on those pictures that give "the farthest location reachable with the fuel on board" muriel_volestrangler Mar 2014 #51
Not to be pedantic, but that chart doesn't say anything about fuel BlueStreak Mar 2014 #53
I'm not 'glossing over the fuel issue'; we can see that the expected flight to Beijing muriel_volestrangler Mar 2014 #54
I don't follow your claim about the horizon. BlueStreak Mar 2014 #48
Those figures do show it would have been below his horizon muriel_volestrangler Mar 2014 #50
Indian Ocean: depth contours and undersea features jtuck004 Mar 2014 #4
I watched Bill O'really tonight for the first time in doc03 Mar 2014 #5
SCHEDULING DOC03 FOR ASS KICKING Skittles Mar 2014 #9
Once in a while I go over to the dark side to see doc03 Mar 2014 #13
HALF AN ASS KICKING Skittles Mar 2014 #17
how does that work? TorchTheWitch Mar 2014 #27
well, I start in on him Skittles Mar 2014 #29
so both cheeks equally and just not as much TorchTheWitch Mar 2014 #30
I WILL KICK HAIRY DOG-BEAR-LION ASS Skittles Mar 2014 #31
LOL! n/t complain jane Mar 2014 #28
They'll invent a media conspiracy of silence when it serves their purposes. LeftyMom Mar 2014 #12
Now the size of Arizona, they say, about 114,000 sq miles. n/t jtuck004 Mar 2014 #6
A new update posted in LBN. SoapBox Mar 2014 #11
Interesting. If it landed in the 'outback' it could be why it's hard to find. That was one of the freshwest Mar 2014 #14
You can't land a 777 on just any airstrip. caseymoz Mar 2014 #20
How about a L-O-N-G stretch of sand? Not tidy. I'm not talking about an airstrip at all. Just slide. freshwest Mar 2014 #23
I'm sure there's smooth spots in the outback caseymoz Mar 2014 #40
Sound like the pilot that said it could have been on unmonitored autopilot could be right. Kablooie Mar 2014 #18
There's not too many places a 777 can land. caseymoz Mar 2014 #19
It is a strange situation Aerows Mar 2014 #22
This whole story Aerows Mar 2014 #21
K&R...Thanks for posting red dog 1 Mar 2014 #25
MSNBC just went live with the news Rhiannon12866 Mar 2014 #26
The route had been pre-programmed. WinkyDink Mar 2014 #34
Pilot murder/suicide has been the most probable scenario from the start, imo PorridgeGun Mar 2014 #35
For either scenario, you could add that the hijacker could have been injured muriel_volestrangler Mar 2014 #39
UPDATE FRIDAY AM: AU couldn't find the debris; may have sunk or drifted(pics 5 d old) librechik Mar 2014 #55
Countries say that their radar could have detected the plane but Rosa Luxemburg Mar 2014 #56
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Search for Missing Malays...»Reply #16