Latest Breaking News

lunatica

(53,410 posts)

28. I wonder if the Obama Administration didn't start this issue just for this to happen

Fri Mar 16, 2012, 08:55 AM

Mar 2012

It's all politics right now. Election year campaigning on all sides.

Take it all the way to the Supreme Court Mr. Missouri businessman. Go fight for your right to dictate religious dogma to the Government. It's time for the Separation of the Church and the State to be re-affirmed. If it isn't then we'll have a better idea of what kind of a country we live in. Democratic or Theocratic.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

52 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Missouri Man Is First Private Business Owner to Sue HHS Over Contraception Mandate [View all] hedgehog Mar 2012 OP

ACLJ Files Suit Challenging HHS Mandate for Violating Religious Beliefs of Missouri Business Owner rfranklin Mar 2012 #1

All righty then LibertyLover Mar 2012 #29

ACLJ is Pat Robertson's legal org; lastlib Mar 2012 #2

I was just getting ready to Google that proud2BlibKansan Mar 2012 #4

Looks like a legitimate company proud2BlibKansan Mar 2012 #3

St Louis is a major center for industrial refractories - the hedgehog Mar 2012 #6

How does it violate his religious beliefs? Quantess Mar 2012 #5

Yup. Shadowflash Mar 2012 #12

The mandate says any new plan must provide contraceptive products at no cost .... BOHICA12 Mar 2012 #27

I see your point, but I think it's a matter of perpective Quantess Mar 2012 #31

I'm with you there somewhat .... but BOHICA12 Mar 2012 #32

It is an earning for the employee jmowreader Mar 2012 #52

Bingo. aquart Mar 2012 #34

Their Mission Statement Bonhomme Richard Mar 2012 #7

"Mean spirited behavior will not be tolerated. " Old and In the Way Mar 2012 #11

I was thinking about something similar. Control-Z Mar 2012 #24

Don't forget ongoing pediatric care, too. aquart Mar 2012 #35

We will not discriminate based on anyone's personal belief system" crazylikafox Mar 2012 #13

"We will not discriminate based on anyone's belief system." There it is in a nutshell. They are not jwirr Mar 2012 #14

He left one out bongbong Mar 2012 #22

If he has ONE employee that works on a Sunday, he will lose. Ikonoklast Mar 2012 #8

Good luck with that. Where are the damages? caseymoz Mar 2012 #9

All they can show is more costs loyalsister Mar 2012 #38

I argue with my Dad about this. caseymoz Mar 2012 #39

So can a Jehovah's Witness business owner ban covering transfusions? denverbill Mar 2012 #10

There is nothing to stop a JW employer from excluding blood transfusion coverage from kestrel91316 Mar 2012 #15

To stop the slippery slope? The Supreme Court put limits on religious freedom. 1878 Reynolds v. US Brettongarcia Mar 2012 #20

I should have specified that nothing other than the USSC kestrel91316 Mar 2012 #23

That little nagging voice whispers that the last thing the administration wants to do in an election 24601 Mar 2012 #33

Yeah but, earlier legal precedents, disallowing religious exemptions, don't just include tax cases Brettongarcia Mar 2012 #36

oh no starbucks! greymattermom Mar 2012 #26

There is clear legal precedent stopping this joeglow3 Mar 2012 #30

All organizations accepting government funding/regulation, should obey full federal HHS law Brettongarcia Mar 2012 #37

How about everyone else joeglow3 Mar 2012 #43

Lots of cases do not allow private citizens religious exemption from law Brettongarcia Mar 2012 #45

Apples and Oranges joeglow3 Mar 2012 #50

Does the insurance EC Mar 2012 #16

There is something that has been christx30 Mar 2012 #17

Yeah, I've been thinking about that too. EC Mar 2012 #19

Why is he allowed to know what medications his employees are on? Aerows Mar 2012 #18

plain and simple SemperEadem Mar 2012 #21

...and the rightwing crazies are complaining ... la la Mar 2012 #25

I wonder if the Obama Administration didn't start this issue just for this to happen lunatica Mar 2012 #28

question??? onethatcares Mar 2012 #40

Do you mean to imply that this fine, upstanding gentleman, hedgehog Mar 2012 #41

Guess this guys doesn't do birth control.... SamG Mar 2012 #42

Here is a non right wing source alp227 Mar 2012 #44

Thank you for posting that URL for Conwebwatch. So glad to see it. n/t Judi Lynn Mar 2012 #47

I'm pro choice cstanleytech Mar 2012 #46

Under the Health Care Reform, businesses over a certain size must provide hedgehog Mar 2012 #48

Yes I know that its under that however is it constitutional? After all our government does from time cstanleytech Mar 2012 #49

HEY!!! You know what? I have objections about my taxes being used for bogus wars! KansDem Mar 2012 #51