Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Targeting Huawei: NSA Spied on Chinese Government and Networking Firm [View all]MADem
(135,425 posts)43. And that's why the entire EU shares the data they get when the listen in on us.
And that's why they engage in the same kind of shenanigans that every other nation engages in. It's all part of the game:
Allies spy on each other. The French broke into our diplomats' hotel rooms and sifted through luggage, Israel has tried to infiltrate spies into the Pentagon, Mexico stole White House BlackBerry devices, and Germany broke into the email communications of both diplomats and journalists. But why? Read on.
Really--the naive outrage is astounding--of course everyone is spying on each other. As that French government official revealed, the only thing that is surprising is that there are people who are actually surprised at this.
I am amazed by such disconcerting naiveté, he said in the interview. Youd almost think our politicians dont bother to read the reports they get from the intelligence services.
Back in the old days, before wiretapping, we used HUMINT. We had people who listened in, who broke into places and stole documents, who used their wiles, personality and more to obtain information, who later, photographed documents and put them on a microfilm, a microDOT, even. This is just an extension of that, and like it or not, it's not going away.
They may--or may not--be able to "place limits" on it, but the only way to categorically assure you are not being tapped on your phone is the same way that you could assure you were not being tapped a hundred years ago--stay off the phone. LIMIT your exposure.
That might be unsatisfactory to some, but that is the simple truth. Shooting the messenger, calling me an "apologist" or other invective, will not change that basic fact. And, mark my words, our intel services may be forced, by outraged "How DARE you!" demands from the citizenry, and ratchet back THEIR domestic surveillance, but those demands will fall on deaf ears beyond our shores. The only thing that will change is WHO is listening to you.
And what will eventually happen is what always happens when there's something we cannot or will not do, for political/ethical reasons--we'll contract it out. Just like Europe has been doing, for YEARS. France already spies for Germany, Germany spies for France, and everyone shares with the Brits. There will just be more "musical chairs" to get around national laws, and the game will play on.
Again, shooting the messenger will not change this, but take your shots, call me names, get your poutrage on, if it makes you feel better.
The NSA is no more of a rogue than every single one of the European security services, most of the South American ones, the Russians, or PLA Unit 61398--what those guys in China do do makes USA look like Goody Two Shoes. And if you think that Edward Snowden has "freedom" from all manner of surveillance in his little Russian hideaway, then Chris Christie has a bridge he will sell you at a very deep discount.
The only thing that has changed--or will change--about this game is that the world is slightly less naive.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
72 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Targeting Huawei: NSA Spied on Chinese Government and Networking Firm [View all]
Newsjock
Mar 2014
OP
So, can anyone tell me why it wasnt it ok to reveal Plames name but revealing efforts at gathering
cstanleytech
Mar 2014
#1
Wrong Question. A better one would be: "Why are we so paranoid that we feel this is even necessary?"
RC
Mar 2014
#3
a good questions for Chamber of Commerce affiliates who loves themselves some
Supersedeas
Mar 2014
#71
That must be the reason the NSA was listening in on the phone calls of Angela Merkel, right?
RC
Mar 2014
#29
I think the pot is calling the kettle, here. Your situational awareness is lacking.
MADem
Mar 2014
#47
for a paradoy of a jr. high school gossip, you nailed it. Add <sarcasm> or someone will think
pragmatic_dem
Mar 2014
#33
i enjoy good parody and your performance is compelling, you clearly immerse yourself in the role
pragmatic_dem
Mar 2014
#45
Der Spiegel is a big mean publicity-seeking poopyhead that dated a pole dancer!
Newsjock
Mar 2014
#9
Yes but what about Snowden revealing it? You kinda didnt address that aspect.
cstanleytech
Mar 2014
#14
Snowden is carrying water for the Military Industrial Complex with this revelation.
MADem
Mar 2014
#18
I've also noticed a certain 'pattern' in the general timing and topicality of specific releases...
Blue_Tires
Mar 2014
#57
See post 40--supposedly, Snowden can't "end" this because he's not doing the leaking and
MADem
Mar 2014
#41
We've learned that Obama will NEVER challenge institutions: banks, CIA, FBI, NSA, insurance corps,
pragmatic_dem
Mar 2014
#44
maybe we should have thought about that before selling millions of jobs and $trillions in technology
pragmatic_dem
Mar 2014
#34
Yep. I can't fathom the outrage, especially since their operation makes ours look like
MADem
Mar 2014
#42