Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MADem

(135,425 posts)
43. And that's why the entire EU shares the data they get when the listen in on us.
Sun Mar 23, 2014, 02:41 PM
Mar 2014

And that's why they engage in the same kind of shenanigans that every other nation engages in. It's all part of the game:

Allies spy on each other. The French broke into our diplomats' hotel rooms and sifted through luggage, Israel has tried to infiltrate spies into the Pentagon, Mexico stole White House BlackBerry devices, and Germany broke into the email communications of both diplomats and journalists. But why? Read on.

Really--the naive outrage is astounding--of course everyone is spying on each other. As that French government official revealed, the only thing that is surprising is that there are people who are actually surprised at this.

“I am amazed by such disconcerting naiveté,” he said in the interview. “You’d almost think our politicians don’t bother to read the reports they get from the intelligence services.”



Back in the old days, before wiretapping, we used HUMINT. We had people who listened in, who broke into places and stole documents, who used their wiles, personality and more to obtain information, who later, photographed documents and put them on a microfilm, a microDOT, even. This is just an extension of that, and like it or not, it's not going away.

They may--or may not--be able to "place limits" on it, but the only way to categorically assure you are not being tapped on your phone is the same way that you could assure you were not being tapped a hundred years ago--stay off the phone. LIMIT your exposure.

That might be unsatisfactory to some, but that is the simple truth. Shooting the messenger, calling me an "apologist" or other invective, will not change that basic fact. And, mark my words, our intel services may be forced, by outraged "How DARE you!" demands from the citizenry, and ratchet back THEIR domestic surveillance, but those demands will fall on deaf ears beyond our shores. The only thing that will change is WHO is listening to you.

And what will eventually happen is what always happens when there's something we cannot or will not do, for political/ethical reasons--we'll contract it out. Just like Europe has been doing, for YEARS. France already spies for Germany, Germany spies for France, and everyone shares with the Brits. There will just be more "musical chairs" to get around national laws, and the game will play on.

Again, shooting the messenger will not change this, but take your shots, call me names, get your poutrage on, if it makes you feel better.

The NSA is no more of a rogue than every single one of the European security services, most of the South American ones, the Russians, or PLA Unit 61398--what those guys in China do do makes USA look like Goody Two Shoes. And if you think that Edward Snowden has "freedom" from all manner of surveillance in his little Russian hideaway, then Chris Christie has a bridge he will sell you at a very deep discount.

The only thing that has changed--or will change--about this game is that the world is slightly less naive.



Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

So, can anyone tell me why it wasnt it ok to reveal Plames name but revealing efforts at gathering cstanleytech Mar 2014 #1
I'm outraged creeksneakers2 Mar 2014 #2
Yes, "ignorance is bliss", "Truth? You can't handle the truth" dotymed Mar 2014 #25
So does it matter when China spies on us? Blue_Tires Mar 2014 #56
Sweet Jeebus..... Adrahil Mar 2014 #61
Wrong Question. A better one would be: "Why are we so paranoid that we feel this is even necessary?" RC Mar 2014 #3
Well, in this case, Huawei has a questionable past when it comes to penultimate Mar 2014 #5
We treat the Chinese like adversaries creeksneakers2 Mar 2014 #7
Then why are they our biggest trading partners? RC Mar 2014 #11
Its called constructive engagement creeksneakers2 Mar 2014 #12
a good questions for Chamber of Commerce affiliates who loves themselves some Supersedeas Mar 2014 #71
Have you ever heard of Pearl Harbor? baldguy Mar 2014 #13
Yeah, I've been there. RC Mar 2014 #15
Do you believe that none of these countries use their penultimate Mar 2014 #16
Pearl Harbor & 9/11 are proof that the world is not always happy, pure & safe. baldguy Mar 2014 #19
Here's one for you--You've never heard of PLA UNIT 61398? MADem Mar 2014 #17
That must be the reason the NSA was listening in on the phone calls of Angela Merkel, right? RC Mar 2014 #29
And that's why the entire EU shares the data they get when the listen in on us. MADem Mar 2014 #43
FWIW, Merkel was talking on a relatively unsecured phone Blue_Tires Mar 2014 #53
The missed point being, she should not have needed a secure phone. RC Mar 2014 #59
World leaders and heads of state don't need secure phones? Blue_Tires Mar 2014 #66
I may be wrong, but I'm under the impression penultimate Mar 2014 #72
To be fair, I'm pretty sure somewhere in those documents are proof Blue_Tires Mar 2014 #55
Don't jibe? Because they don't agree with your opinions? RC Mar 2014 #60
Not necessarily.... Blue_Tires Mar 2014 #67
It's paranoid to think the Chinese are worth spying on? NT Adrahil Mar 2014 #62
It is paranoid to think spying on our friends and us, US. RC Mar 2014 #65
eddie's a little god.. he can do whatever the fuck he wants.. but, no Cha Mar 2014 #24
Thought the files Snowden was safe, guess that did not work out well. Thinkingabout Mar 2014 #4
Yawn the Chinese are picking us clean.... Historic NY Mar 2014 #6
Go away Comrade Snowden.......... you time has come! Cryptoad Mar 2014 #8
Michelle Obama and the kids are visiting China--Eddie's just gotta make a stink! MADem Mar 2014 #20
how about some facts Rumold Mar 2014 #32
Yes, he HAS. MADem Mar 2014 #38
ok, your reading comprehension seems lacking Rumold Mar 2014 #46
I think the pot is calling the kettle, here. Your situational awareness is lacking. MADem Mar 2014 #47
in your fantasy world, did your reply make sense? Rumold Mar 2014 #49
Someone has no retort, plainly. MADem Mar 2014 #50
Post removed Post removed Mar 2014 #51
So, you're saying Snowden DOES have control over the material he's leaking? MADem Mar 2014 #52
Did St. Eddie STEAL those documents? Adrahil Mar 2014 #63
for a paradoy of a jr. high school gossip, you nailed it. Add <sarcasm> or someone will think pragmatic_dem Mar 2014 #33
I guess you're an expert on "jr. high school gossip" then? nt MADem Mar 2014 #37
i enjoy good parody and your performance is compelling, you clearly immerse yourself in the role pragmatic_dem Mar 2014 #45
Oh, a wee bit of pique! "Clearly!" MADem Mar 2014 #48
Der Spiegel is a big mean publicity-seeking poopyhead that dated a pole dancer! Newsjock Mar 2014 #9
I actually don't have a problem with this Ex Lurker Mar 2014 #10
Yes but what about Snowden revealing it? You kinda didnt address that aspect. cstanleytech Mar 2014 #14
Snowden is carrying water for the Military Industrial Complex with this revelation. MADem Mar 2014 #18
Good point, MADem.. Eddie is all.. neener neener neener.. The USA(bad) is spying Cha Mar 2014 #23
I've also noticed a certain 'pattern' in the general timing and topicality of specific releases... Blue_Tires Mar 2014 #57
I know.. a lot of us have, BT.. it doesn't Cha Mar 2014 #58
Give Snowden immunity and bring him home. cosmicone Mar 2014 #21
This sounds an awful lot like vdogg Mar 2014 #26
I doubt we are in a position to make any demands. cosmicone Mar 2014 #31
Heck no. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Mar 2014 #27
His cards will be seen by the whole world cosmicone Mar 2014 #30
The NSA is already a bad joke. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Mar 2014 #35
But..... but...... but......!!! MADem Mar 2014 #40
I've put what seems like half this site on ignore fujiyama Mar 2014 #22
^^^ This ^^^^ n/t cosmicone Mar 2014 #39
See post 40--supposedly, Snowden can't "end" this because he's not doing the leaking and MADem Mar 2014 #41
We've learned that Obama will NEVER challenge institutions: banks, CIA, FBI, NSA, insurance corps, pragmatic_dem Mar 2014 #44
Yeah some of these leaks are highly irresponsible. Not a good one this. BenzoDia Mar 2014 #28
maybe we should have thought about that before selling millions of jobs and $trillions in technology pragmatic_dem Mar 2014 #34
Who here actually has problems with spying on China? iandhr Mar 2014 #36
Yep. I can't fathom the outrage, especially since their operation makes ours look like MADem Mar 2014 #42
Not me. n/t FSogol Mar 2014 #70
So after all that vetting and scrutineering, why would SnowWald leak documents of what looks like a Blue_Tires Mar 2014 #54
Let's play a game. randome Mar 2014 #64
You're actually half-right already Blue_Tires Mar 2014 #69
I've been to their headquarters in Plano snooper2 Mar 2014 #68
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Targeting Huawei: NSA Spi...»Reply #43