Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Hissyspit

(45,790 posts)
Mon Mar 24, 2014, 08:39 PM Mar 2014

Breaking: Obama to Call for End to N.S.A.’s Bulk Data Collection [View all]

Source: New York Times

Obama to Call for End to N.S.A.’s Bulk Data Collection

By CHARLIE SAVAGE
March 24, 2014

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration is preparing to unveil a legislative proposal to drastically overhaul the National Security Agency’s once-secret bulk phone records program.

Under the proposal, data about Americans’ calling habits would be kept in the hands of phone companies, which would not be required to retain the data for any longer than they normally would, according to senior administration officials. If approved by Congress, the changes would end the most controversial part of the bulk phone records program, a major focus of privacy concerns inside the United States since its existence was leaked last year.

In a speech in January, President Obama said he wanted to get the N.S.A. out of the business of collecting call records in bulk while preserving the program’s capabilities. He acknowledged, however, that there was no easy way to do so, and had instructed Justice Department and intelligence officials to come up with a plan by March 28 — Friday — when the current court order authorizing the program expires.

As part of the proposal, the administration has decided to renew the program as it currently exists for at least one more 90-day cycle, senior administration officials said. But under the plan the administration has developed and now advocates, the officials said, the government would no longer systematically collect and store records of calling data. Instead, it would obtain individual orders from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to obtain only records linked to phone numbers a judge agrees are likely tied to terrorism.

Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/25/us/obama-to-seek-nsa-curb-on-call-data.html

70 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Did he just mention this in Europe? yeoman6987 Mar 2014 #1
they arent gonna obey him leftyohiolib Mar 2014 #2
yeah... grasswire Mar 2014 #3
What should he do? nt Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #9
what can he do leftyohiolib Mar 2014 #11
Uh.... I'm taking that to be a "nothing" nt Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #18
They're all executive hires pscot Mar 2014 #13
Who's an executive hire? I'm confused. Are there servants somewhere? As in Downton Abbey? nt Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #17
big deal,so what? easychoice Mar 2014 #4
So what should he do instead? nt Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #10
Interesting that no one seems to answer your question, they just have to make a negative comment. lostincalifornia Mar 2014 #19
Because they're Naderites. Naderites are useless whiners with no ideas at all, that's why :) Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #23
good,more attacks- complete with no truth. easychoice Mar 2014 #25
No, it's no attack. It's fact. nt Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #26
I would call it an attack. nt Mojorabbit Mar 2014 #39
Naderites might consider attack, but it is FACT that (1) they ACCEPTED money from the GOP Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #49
If you have a link for Nader or his campaign accepting money from thee GOP dreamnightwind Mar 2014 #69
Who knows, but one thing is certain, constant cynicism and negativity is a losing strategy. That is lostincalifornia Mar 2014 #30
Well, I know two things: Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #31
that wasn't a negative comment. easychoice Mar 2014 #24
If you think that because I said some make negative comments a personal attack then do an alert on m lostincalifornia Mar 2014 #43
Mixed emotions. AtheistCrusader Mar 2014 #5
Of course it sounds positive, but as usual it begs some questions... Pholus Mar 2014 #6
Place "bulk metadata collection" on Facebook and Google it! ;) nt adirondacker Mar 2014 #14
Obama has responded responsibly at every stage of this issue. ODS sufferers don't want to hear that uhnope Mar 2014 #7
What exactly is an ODS sufferer? JohnRogan Mar 2014 #15
Obama Derangement Syndrome. Liberal Veteran Mar 2014 #21
Obama Derangement Syndrome. mac56 Mar 2014 #22
Got it thank you! its the opposite of POIG Syndrome, JohnRogan Mar 2014 #36
it's something that Charles Krauthammer made up to counter any criticism of dear leader.. frylock Mar 2014 #33
I forgot that it was a Republican thang first. Pholus Mar 2014 #54
Obama is the chief executive. quadrature Mar 2014 #8
If he does that, he's "Tyrannical Dictator, Marxist-Fascist, His Majesty King Obama" tarheelsunc Mar 2014 #12
You're right. PSPS Mar 2014 #34
Thanks Obama.. You #%^ &&**(K(K))&^%%@!!!111 Cha Mar 2014 #16
can anyone really see this happening under a republican administration? I sure don't. Gee, so the lostincalifornia Mar 2014 #28
No the recons would double down. Great analysis, lostincalifornia. And, no.. they conveniently Cha Mar 2014 #32
+1 DCBob Mar 2014 #45
thanks again Mr. Snowden and... wildbilln864 Mar 2014 #20
Thank Snowden for this. ozone_man Mar 2014 #27
Until that Utah hard drive is gone, this isn't America. PSPS Mar 2014 #35
Well, that should fix it. progressoid Mar 2014 #29
Yes. And of course they still have access to all that meta data via 5 eyes. JimDandy Mar 2014 #38
Time to flood the WH email with appreciation for this stand n/t eridani Mar 2014 #37
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2014 #52
I'm skeptical Aerows Mar 2014 #40
Haha, wouldn't be a problem if Obama didn't vote for immunity to begin with. joshcryer Mar 2014 #41
Good to see he's actually trying to get something done about the issue Blue_Tires Mar 2014 #42
+1000 JustAnotherGen Mar 2014 #53
You would be wrong. From Greenwald today: NOVA_Dem Mar 2014 #55
Actually, I'm right because there is ZERO praise for Obama in that piece Blue_Tires Mar 2014 #58
Did you expect pompoms and cartwheels from someone who has just been vindicated? NOVA_Dem Mar 2014 #59
I just expected some straight fucking talk from him for once in his life Blue_Tires Mar 2014 #60
Greenwald is nothing but "pompoms and cartwheels" in honor of his own damn self. phleshdef Mar 2014 #62
The powers that be know polynomial Mar 2014 #44
Finally. /nt Ash_F Mar 2014 #46
I'm not optimistic, but calling for it beats not calling for it. Orsino Mar 2014 #47
That would be good in a number of ways. Union Scribe Mar 2014 #48
I'm waiting for multiple threads of praise for the President for doing the right thing... NOVA_Dem Mar 2014 #57
Thanks to those who applied pressure. ForgoTheConsequence Mar 2014 #50
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2014 #51
"NSA would gain access to cellphone records under Obama plan" totodeinhere Mar 2014 #56
thx for that link questionseverything Mar 2014 #65
Thanks, doesn't look so great dreamnightwind Mar 2014 #70
The perpetually disgruntled are already busy moving the goal posts. JoePhilly Mar 2014 #61
I'll wait to see what is actually in the bill. I don't believe they will stop to abuse. Weasels. nt GoneFishin Mar 2014 #63
Now.....Really? realFedUp Mar 2014 #64
Thank you Snowden! passiveporcupine Mar 2014 #66
Way too little, and way too late. blkmusclmachine Mar 2014 #67
Where's the public oversight? Android3.14 Mar 2014 #68
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Breaking: Obama to Call f...