Latest Breaking News

JimDandy

(7,318 posts)

38. Yes. And of course they still have access to all that meta data via 5 eyes.

Reply to progressoid (Reply #29)

Mon Mar 24, 2014, 10:13 PM

Mar 2014

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

70 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Breaking: Obama to Call for End to N.S.A.’s Bulk Data Collection [View all] Hissyspit Mar 2014 OP

Did he just mention this in Europe? yeoman6987 Mar 2014 #1

they arent gonna obey him leftyohiolib Mar 2014 #2

yeah... grasswire Mar 2014 #3

What should he do? nt Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #9

what can he do leftyohiolib Mar 2014 #11

Uh.... I'm taking that to be a "nothing" nt Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #18

They're all executive hires pscot Mar 2014 #13

Who's an executive hire? I'm confused. Are there servants somewhere? As in Downton Abbey? nt Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #17

big deal,so what? easychoice Mar 2014 #4

So what should he do instead? nt Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #10

Interesting that no one seems to answer your question, they just have to make a negative comment. lostincalifornia Mar 2014 #19

Because they're Naderites. Naderites are useless whiners with no ideas at all, that's why :) Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #23

good,more attacks- complete with no truth. easychoice Mar 2014 #25

No, it's no attack. It's fact. nt Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #26

I would call it an attack. nt Mojorabbit Mar 2014 #39

Naderites might consider attack, but it is FACT that (1) they ACCEPTED money from the GOP Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #49

If you have a link for Nader or his campaign accepting money from thee GOP dreamnightwind Mar 2014 #69

Who knows, but one thing is certain, constant cynicism and negativity is a losing strategy. That is lostincalifornia Mar 2014 #30

Well, I know two things: Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #31

that wasn't a negative comment. easychoice Mar 2014 #24

If you think that because I said some make negative comments a personal attack then do an alert on m lostincalifornia Mar 2014 #43

Mixed emotions. AtheistCrusader Mar 2014 #5

Of course it sounds positive, but as usual it begs some questions... Pholus Mar 2014 #6

Place "bulk metadata collection" on Facebook and Google it! ;) nt adirondacker Mar 2014 #14

Obama has responded responsibly at every stage of this issue. ODS sufferers don't want to hear that uhnope Mar 2014 #7

What exactly is an ODS sufferer? JohnRogan Mar 2014 #15

Obama Derangement Syndrome. Liberal Veteran Mar 2014 #21

Obama Derangement Syndrome. mac56 Mar 2014 #22

Got it thank you! its the opposite of POIG Syndrome, JohnRogan Mar 2014 #36

it's something that Charles Krauthammer made up to counter any criticism of dear leader.. frylock Mar 2014 #33

I forgot that it was a Republican thang first. Pholus Mar 2014 #54

Obama is the chief executive. quadrature Mar 2014 #8

If he does that, he's "Tyrannical Dictator, Marxist-Fascist, His Majesty King Obama" tarheelsunc Mar 2014 #12

You're right. PSPS Mar 2014 #34

Thanks Obama.. You #%^ &&**(K(K))&^%%@!!!111 Cha Mar 2014 #16

can anyone really see this happening under a republican administration? I sure don't. Gee, so the lostincalifornia Mar 2014 #28

No the recons would double down. Great analysis, lostincalifornia. And, no.. they conveniently Cha Mar 2014 #32

+1 DCBob Mar 2014 #45

thanks again Mr. Snowden and... wildbilln864 Mar 2014 #20

Thank Snowden for this. ozone_man Mar 2014 #27

Until that Utah hard drive is gone, this isn't America. PSPS Mar 2014 #35

Well, that should fix it. progressoid Mar 2014 #29

Yes. And of course they still have access to all that meta data via 5 eyes. JimDandy Mar 2014 #38

Time to flood the WH email with appreciation for this stand n/t eridani Mar 2014 #37

Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2014 #52

I'm skeptical Aerows Mar 2014 #40

Haha, wouldn't be a problem if Obama didn't vote for immunity to begin with. joshcryer Mar 2014 #41

Good to see he's actually trying to get something done about the issue Blue_Tires Mar 2014 #42

+1000 JustAnotherGen Mar 2014 #53

You would be wrong. From Greenwald today: NOVA_Dem Mar 2014 #55

Actually, I'm right because there is ZERO praise for Obama in that piece Blue_Tires Mar 2014 #58

Did you expect pompoms and cartwheels from someone who has just been vindicated? NOVA_Dem Mar 2014 #59

I just expected some straight fucking talk from him for once in his life Blue_Tires Mar 2014 #60

Greenwald is nothing but "pompoms and cartwheels" in honor of his own damn self. phleshdef Mar 2014 #62

The powers that be know polynomial Mar 2014 #44

Finally. /nt Ash_F Mar 2014 #46

I'm not optimistic, but calling for it beats not calling for it. Orsino Mar 2014 #47

That would be good in a number of ways. Union Scribe Mar 2014 #48

I'm waiting for multiple threads of praise for the President for doing the right thing... NOVA_Dem Mar 2014 #57

Thanks to those who applied pressure. ForgoTheConsequence Mar 2014 #50

Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2014 #51

"NSA would gain access to cellphone records under Obama plan" totodeinhere Mar 2014 #56

thx for that link questionseverything Mar 2014 #65

Thanks, doesn't look so great dreamnightwind Mar 2014 #70

The perpetually disgruntled are already busy moving the goal posts. JoePhilly Mar 2014 #61

I'll wait to see what is actually in the bill. I don't believe they will stop to abuse. Weasels. nt GoneFishin Mar 2014 #63

Now.....Really? realFedUp Mar 2014 #64

Thank you Snowden! passiveporcupine Mar 2014 #66

Way too little, and way too late. blkmusclmachine Mar 2014 #67

Where's the public oversight? Android3.14 Mar 2014 #68