Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
Showing Original Post only (View all)Hobby Lobby case: Justices skeptical of White House position [View all]
Source: Politico Pro
The Supreme Court expressed skepticism today of the legality of the Obama administration's refusal to accommodate for-profit companies' religious objections to the Obamacare contraceptive requirement.
A majority of the justices seemed particularly doubtful of the administration's claim that for-profit companies have no religious rights under federal law.
The Obama administration says the provision advances a compelling government interest in promoting preventive health care and that it does so in the least intrusive way, without unconstitutionally impinging on religious freedom.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2014/03/hobby-lobby-case-supreme-court-104999.html?hp=l3
It is real simple premise.
If your entity is a Non-Profit, you can "express" your political views;
but you CAN'T impose them on your staff and the public.
A corporation (such as the U.S. Government) - can NOT impose their political beliefs on others.
For profit businesses can't hope to treat the public at large as et al consumers;
but put doctrines contrary to law (and common sense) to enslave workers to owners beliefs.
Ted Nugent would start a gun company tomorrow and compel everyone to own a gun!
83 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It's absurd. Can you picture preachers buying businesses with church monies in a Citizen's U effort
laserhaas
Mar 2014
#2
I'd rather not pay for the military operations in the mid-east. If you want it, you're certainly wel
LanternWaste
Mar 2014
#10
As one who suffers troll attacks much more than most. I am glad there's policing (by jury).
laserhaas
Mar 2014
#61
Yes, I can. It's incremental theocracy, until there's no way to resist in every day life. Ryan
freshwest
Mar 2014
#68
I'm with you on all of that. Elizabeth Warren would have made a much better choice.
laserhaas
Mar 2014
#62
Standing (partially) corrected. Still desire Warren (get it) for Justice US Sup Ct
laserhaas
Mar 2014
#76
Corporations are (by nature) fictitious pseudo entities and can't have a conscience by nature
laserhaas
Mar 2014
#32
And if the owner objects to blood transfusions, vaccinations, use of anethesia during labor etc?
hedgehog
Mar 2014
#5
Hey, don't jump my cart "calimary'. I'm suing Romney, Bain etc for Racketeering, We go to court Apr
laserhaas
Mar 2014
#38
I've had some success. Larry Reynolds, Frank Vennes, Marc Dreier and Tom Petters are all doing time
laserhaas
Mar 2014
#41
WOW - a great result of "be careful what you ask for". But - would it serve more ill in the end?
laserhaas
Mar 2014
#35
here's a better source then, Washington Post Supreme Court reporter Robert Barnes:
alp227
Mar 2014
#24
Heard on NPR there were protesters outside SCOTUS chanting "My faith, my business!"
alp227
Mar 2014
#26
WOW - Priceless "I'm not sure but I think I saw Monsanto in church last Sunday wearing a toupee"
laserhaas
Mar 2014
#64
I'm trying to get Bain Capital and Goldman Sachs indicted for Racketeering. If I kill their corps
laserhaas
Mar 2014
#69
This is how you begin replacing Civil law with far rightwing "Biblical law."
blkmusclmachine
Mar 2014
#77