Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
8. Pretty sure most states already enforce the Lautenberg Amendment.
Wed Mar 26, 2014, 02:17 PM
Mar 2014

What they lack, is the ability to knowingly do so, since people don't register guns. Cops don't know what to collect when someone is convicted.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Good. nt enlightenment Mar 2014 #1
+1 sakabatou Mar 2014 #36
It will be interesting to see if states actually step up and address this retrospectively... hlthe2b Mar 2014 #2
There should be uniformity as to how the states define domestic violence hack89 Mar 2014 #5
Pretty sure most states already enforce the Lautenberg Amendment. AtheistCrusader Mar 2014 #8
This ruling prevent many of the Tea/Repukes/NRA from owing their firearms! hue Mar 2014 #3
This ruling will prevent many from owning firearms, uncommonlink Mar 2014 #6
Domestic abuse isn't tied to one party. eggplant Mar 2014 #16
Very true. hue Mar 2014 #18
I'm afraid it wont stop them from owning them, Mr.Bill Mar 2014 #29
It won't, any more than making drugs illegal keeps people from using them. Jgarrick Mar 2014 #30
I agree... Deuce Mar 2014 #38
MRA and gundamentalist blogs will be in total meltdown today. alp227 Mar 2014 #4
As will the Gungeon. KamaAina Mar 2014 #14
Doubtful. uncommonlink Mar 2014 #17
Make that four- I agree with it. Your interlocutor needs to be reminded of... friendly_iconoclast Mar 2014 #25
No - this is a 17 year old law hack89 Mar 2014 #31
Wait....! Is that a CAMEL'S NOSE I see?!? n/t TygrBright Mar 2014 #7
This isn't a new thing. This has been the law since what, 1986? AtheistCrusader Mar 2014 #9
The Supreme Court gets something right for a change! perdita9 Mar 2014 #10
NRA Flipout in 3..2..1.. berni_mccoy Mar 2014 #11
NRA gun rights nuts heads exploding kimbutgar Mar 2014 #12
cool bowens43 Mar 2014 #13
I might even break strict protocol and head over to the Gungeon KamaAina Mar 2014 #15
It's not even posted there. uncommonlink Mar 2014 #19
Welcome back!!! LanternWaste Mar 2014 #21
Welcome back? uncommonlink Mar 2014 #24
+100 billh58 Mar 2014 #35
What about the returnee that speaks rather Loudly against guns? friendly_iconoclast Mar 2014 #39
Still trying to figure out what welcome back means. uncommonlink Mar 2014 #40
He's implying you're a zombie, a previously banned poster under a new name friendly_iconoclast Mar 2014 #42
Zombie? What an interesting way to describe a banned person. uncommonlink Mar 2014 #43
I'll let Wikipedia explain: friendly_iconoclast Mar 2014 #44
Ok. uncommonlink Mar 2014 #45
You will find support for the law hack89 Mar 2014 #32
this is huge samsingh Mar 2014 #20
You won't hear any complaints from me. Castleman was convicted after due process... friendly_iconoclast Mar 2014 #28
I hope Rachel does a segment on this. (nt) Paladin Mar 2014 #22
K&R. This is a good ruling friendly_iconoclast Mar 2014 #23
Excellent! n/t RKP5637 Mar 2014 #26
Here is the actual opinion happyslug Mar 2014 #27
Very good. nt awoke_in_2003 Mar 2014 #33
Good ruling Gothmog Mar 2014 #34
Dear nra DiverDave Mar 2014 #37
This is good. marble falls Mar 2014 #41
Let me get this straight... derby378 Mar 2014 #46
You obviously don't have much experience with intoxicated farm animals. nt hack89 Mar 2014 #48
Their reputations actually matter to them? dickthegrouch Mar 2014 #47
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»US top court rules domest...»Reply #8