Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: NJ bank won’t notarize American Atheist documents for ‘personal reasons’ [View all]starroute
(12,977 posts)32. It's still discrimination on the basis of relgiion
http://www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/qanda_religion.html
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits employers with at least 15 employees, as well as employment agencies and unions, from discriminating in employment based on race, color, religion, sex, and national origin. It also prohibits retaliation against persons who complain of discrimination or participate in an EEO investigation. With respect to religion, Title VII prohibits:
* treating applicants or employees differently based on their religious beliefs or practices or lack thereof in any aspect of employment, including recruitment, hiring, assignments, discipline, promotion, and benefits (disparate treatment);
* subjecting employees to harassment because of their religious beliefs or practices or lack thereof or because of the religious practices or beliefs of people with whom they associate (e.g., relatives, friends, etc.);
* denying a requested reasonable accommodation of an applicants or employees sincerely held religious beliefs or practices or lack thereof if an accommodation will not impose more than a de minimis cost or burden on business operations; and,
* retaliating against an applicant or employee who has engaged in protected activity, including participation (e.g., filing an EEO charge or testifying as a witness in someone elses EEO matter), or opposition to religious discrimination (e.g., complaining to human resources department about alleged religious discrimination).
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits employers with at least 15 employees, as well as employment agencies and unions, from discriminating in employment based on race, color, religion, sex, and national origin. It also prohibits retaliation against persons who complain of discrimination or participate in an EEO investigation. With respect to religion, Title VII prohibits:
* treating applicants or employees differently based on their religious beliefs or practices or lack thereof in any aspect of employment, including recruitment, hiring, assignments, discipline, promotion, and benefits (disparate treatment);
* subjecting employees to harassment because of their religious beliefs or practices or lack thereof or because of the religious practices or beliefs of people with whom they associate (e.g., relatives, friends, etc.);
* denying a requested reasonable accommodation of an applicants or employees sincerely held religious beliefs or practices or lack thereof if an accommodation will not impose more than a de minimis cost or burden on business operations; and,
* retaliating against an applicant or employee who has engaged in protected activity, including participation (e.g., filing an EEO charge or testifying as a witness in someone elses EEO matter), or opposition to religious discrimination (e.g., complaining to human resources department about alleged religious discrimination).
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
55 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
NJ bank won’t notarize American Atheist documents for ‘personal reasons’ [View all]
Judi Lynn
Mar 2014
OP
You're wrong -- notaries can not refuse to sign on grounds of race or religion
starroute
Mar 2014
#16
As FLGranny said, it is not the notary's job to vet the document. It is about the signature.
DeschutesRiver
Mar 2014
#52
Of course she said that. No one is running until they run. Is Clinton-Sachs running?
rhett o rick
Mar 2014
#46
I think you are splitting hairs. Freedom of religion also means freedom from religion. If one
1monster
Mar 2014
#31
The person who refused the group service should either be put on leave or fired.
sakabatou
Mar 2014
#8
Yes they are, and it causes a great deal more harm than walking across the floor for another notary.
freshwest
Mar 2014
#36
you raise a very good point, as lower echelons fight amongst ourselves...
pragmatic_dem
Mar 2014
#27
"They believe they can just buy their way out of any problem of their own making."
AsahinaKimi
Mar 2014
#30
Notarizing means the notary witnessed the signature, not endorsing the American Atheists, Inc.
muntrv
Mar 2014
#26
And then she probably turns around and says it's 'known' that Atheists don't donate to charity
ck4829
Mar 2014
#29