Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

caseymoz

(5,763 posts)
39. I argue with my Dad about this.
Sat Mar 17, 2012, 12:17 PM
Mar 2012

He's stringently Catholic. I try to tell him that prohibiting employees, or anyone, from dealing with the insurance company directly (even under government regulation) to voluntarily buy contraception, or not, is in no way an act of religious liberty. Not even Scalia can warp that out, and he's already ruled about this on a related case.

I also try to tell him that not even Catholics are going to support their bishops on this, and vote against Obama because of it, but my Dad only talks to Catholics aged 70 and older, and to him it looks like there's overwhelming support.

I don't think he or the bishops have realized the change in this culture. Teen pregnancies have come way down for the first time in living memory, and it looks like its because teens are using contraception. If teens have gotten the message on contraception and reproductive rights, despite all the "abstinence-only" teachings, it means that young and middle age adults must have as well. This is all because of the Internet, that the information is out there despite conservative religious efforts to suppress it. This whole change has happened withing the last decade.

This is the reason why Limbaugh's attacks on Sandra Fluke caused him so much trouble. More women, including so-called conservatives, are using contraception. In the 90s, he might have gotten away with it.

Meanwhile, the Catholic church has been terribly damaged by the child abuse scandals. The mind-bending complaint that gay marriage is an attack on its religious freedom undermines it even more. Now, it says the same thing with this contraception issue, and the bishops sound positively whiny. And this is true of the other sects and people who feel their religious liberty is being impinged.

This is nothing compared to countries and times where you couldn't have Catholic Church's in the open, where priests could not appear as such in public, where Catholics faced physical persecution and jail and for worshiping. All of this still applies to some countries, such as Saudi Arabia and Egypt. The claim of it here is just laughable.

But, I think four or five members of the Supreme Court are Catholic, including Scalia, so there's reason to worry anyway.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

ACLJ Files Suit Challenging HHS Mandate for Violating Religious Beliefs of Missouri Business Owner rfranklin Mar 2012 #1
All righty then LibertyLover Mar 2012 #29
ACLJ is Pat Robertson's legal org; lastlib Mar 2012 #2
I was just getting ready to Google that proud2BlibKansan Mar 2012 #4
Looks like a legitimate company proud2BlibKansan Mar 2012 #3
St Louis is a major center for industrial refractories - the hedgehog Mar 2012 #6
How does it violate his religious beliefs? Quantess Mar 2012 #5
Yup. Shadowflash Mar 2012 #12
The mandate says any new plan must provide contraceptive products at no cost .... BOHICA12 Mar 2012 #27
I see your point, but I think it's a matter of perpective Quantess Mar 2012 #31
I'm with you there somewhat .... but BOHICA12 Mar 2012 #32
It is an earning for the employee jmowreader Mar 2012 #52
Bingo. aquart Mar 2012 #34
Their Mission Statement Bonhomme Richard Mar 2012 #7
"Mean spirited behavior will not be tolerated. " Old and In the Way Mar 2012 #11
I was thinking about something similar. Control-Z Mar 2012 #24
Don't forget ongoing pediatric care, too. aquart Mar 2012 #35
We will not discriminate based on anyone's personal belief system" crazylikafox Mar 2012 #13
"We will not discriminate based on anyone's belief system." There it is in a nutshell. They are not jwirr Mar 2012 #14
He left one out bongbong Mar 2012 #22
If he has ONE employee that works on a Sunday, he will lose. Ikonoklast Mar 2012 #8
Good luck with that. Where are the damages? caseymoz Mar 2012 #9
All they can show is more costs loyalsister Mar 2012 #38
I argue with my Dad about this. caseymoz Mar 2012 #39
So can a Jehovah's Witness business owner ban covering transfusions? denverbill Mar 2012 #10
There is nothing to stop a JW employer from excluding blood transfusion coverage from kestrel91316 Mar 2012 #15
To stop the slippery slope? The Supreme Court put limits on religious freedom. 1878 Reynolds v. US Brettongarcia Mar 2012 #20
I should have specified that nothing other than the USSC kestrel91316 Mar 2012 #23
That little nagging voice whispers that the last thing the administration wants to do in an election 24601 Mar 2012 #33
Yeah but, earlier legal precedents, disallowing religious exemptions, don't just include tax cases Brettongarcia Mar 2012 #36
oh no starbucks! greymattermom Mar 2012 #26
There is clear legal precedent stopping this joeglow3 Mar 2012 #30
All organizations accepting government funding/regulation, should obey full federal HHS law Brettongarcia Mar 2012 #37
How about everyone else joeglow3 Mar 2012 #43
Lots of cases do not allow private citizens religious exemption from law Brettongarcia Mar 2012 #45
Apples and Oranges joeglow3 Mar 2012 #50
Does the insurance EC Mar 2012 #16
There is something that has been christx30 Mar 2012 #17
Yeah, I've been thinking about that too. EC Mar 2012 #19
Why is he allowed to know what medications his employees are on? Aerows Mar 2012 #18
plain and simple SemperEadem Mar 2012 #21
...and the rightwing crazies are complaining ... la la Mar 2012 #25
I wonder if the Obama Administration didn't start this issue just for this to happen lunatica Mar 2012 #28
question??? onethatcares Mar 2012 #40
Do you mean to imply that this fine, upstanding gentleman, hedgehog Mar 2012 #41
Guess this guys doesn't do birth control.... SamG Mar 2012 #42
Here is a non right wing source alp227 Mar 2012 #44
Thank you for posting that URL for Conwebwatch. So glad to see it. n/t Judi Lynn Mar 2012 #47
I'm pro choice cstanleytech Mar 2012 #46
Under the Health Care Reform, businesses over a certain size must provide hedgehog Mar 2012 #48
Yes I know that its under that however is it constitutional? After all our government does from time cstanleytech Mar 2012 #49
HEY!!! You know what? I have objections about my taxes being used for bogus wars! KansDem Mar 2012 #51
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Missouri Man Is First Pri...»Reply #39