Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Missouri Man Is First Private Business Owner to Sue HHS Over Contraception Mandate [View all]caseymoz
(5,763 posts)39. I argue with my Dad about this.
He's stringently Catholic. I try to tell him that prohibiting employees, or anyone, from dealing with the insurance company directly (even under government regulation) to voluntarily buy contraception, or not, is in no way an act of religious liberty. Not even Scalia can warp that out, and he's already ruled about this on a related case.
I also try to tell him that not even Catholics are going to support their bishops on this, and vote against Obama because of it, but my Dad only talks to Catholics aged 70 and older, and to him it looks like there's overwhelming support.
I don't think he or the bishops have realized the change in this culture. Teen pregnancies have come way down for the first time in living memory, and it looks like its because teens are using contraception. If teens have gotten the message on contraception and reproductive rights, despite all the "abstinence-only" teachings, it means that young and middle age adults must have as well. This is all because of the Internet, that the information is out there despite conservative religious efforts to suppress it. This whole change has happened withing the last decade.
This is the reason why Limbaugh's attacks on Sandra Fluke caused him so much trouble. More women, including so-called conservatives, are using contraception. In the 90s, he might have gotten away with it.
Meanwhile, the Catholic church has been terribly damaged by the child abuse scandals. The mind-bending complaint that gay marriage is an attack on its religious freedom undermines it even more. Now, it says the same thing with this contraception issue, and the bishops sound positively whiny. And this is true of the other sects and people who feel their religious liberty is being impinged.
This is nothing compared to countries and times where you couldn't have Catholic Church's in the open, where priests could not appear as such in public, where Catholics faced physical persecution and jail and for worshiping. All of this still applies to some countries, such as Saudi Arabia and Egypt. The claim of it here is just laughable.
But, I think four or five members of the Supreme Court are Catholic, including Scalia, so there's reason to worry anyway.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
52 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Missouri Man Is First Private Business Owner to Sue HHS Over Contraception Mandate [View all]
hedgehog
Mar 2012
OP
ACLJ Files Suit Challenging HHS Mandate for Violating Religious Beliefs of Missouri Business Owner
rfranklin
Mar 2012
#1
The mandate says any new plan must provide contraceptive products at no cost ....
BOHICA12
Mar 2012
#27
"We will not discriminate based on anyone's belief system." There it is in a nutshell. They are not
jwirr
Mar 2012
#14
There is nothing to stop a JW employer from excluding blood transfusion coverage from
kestrel91316
Mar 2012
#15
To stop the slippery slope? The Supreme Court put limits on religious freedom. 1878 Reynolds v. US
Brettongarcia
Mar 2012
#20
That little nagging voice whispers that the last thing the administration wants to do in an election
24601
Mar 2012
#33
Yeah but, earlier legal precedents, disallowing religious exemptions, don't just include tax cases
Brettongarcia
Mar 2012
#36
All organizations accepting government funding/regulation, should obey full federal HHS law
Brettongarcia
Mar 2012
#37
I wonder if the Obama Administration didn't start this issue just for this to happen
lunatica
Mar 2012
#28
Yes I know that its under that however is it constitutional? After all our government does from time
cstanleytech
Mar 2012
#49
HEY!!! You know what? I have objections about my taxes being used for bogus wars!
KansDem
Mar 2012
#51