Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Russia clarifies Ukraine stance as Sergei Lavrov meets John Kerry in Paris. [View all]another_liberal
(8,821 posts)3. Yeah, but . . .
When we orchestrate the overthrow of a democratically elected head of State, and then hand-pick his successor, that is kind of illegal. Just because we can get away with whatever we want to do, that does not make what we do legal.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
99 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Russia clarifies Ukraine stance as Sergei Lavrov meets John Kerry in Paris. [View all]
dipsydoodle
Mar 2014
OP
"globalresearch.org" don't make me laugh. Thinly disguised Russian talking points
uhnope
Mar 2014
#42
The Ukrainian parliamentary election of 2012 took place on 28 October 2012
Duckhunter935
Mar 2014
#23
Yes that is true. And some members of Yanukovych's party, The Party of Regions,
snappyturtle
Mar 2014
#31
ppffff! that last line doesn't pass the laugh test. How many times does our government have to
yurbud
Mar 2014
#79
The table of ministers by party was updated 4 times in March - the last March 24.
karynnj
Mar 2014
#84
Here are links to a few articles on the subject. There are many more, of course.
another_liberal
Apr 2014
#89
In the end, the US will be lucky if they get to keep their puppet gov't in Kiev.
reformist2
Mar 2014
#6
Neither the US nor the rest of the world should accept a referendum held
TwilightGardener
Mar 2014
#15
The US will act militarily for US interests or NATO/defense pact necessity.
TwilightGardener
Mar 2014
#27
One small problem here: Ukraine is not a NATO country and if Lavrov has his way it won't be. nt
snappyturtle
Mar 2014
#35
Did I say it was? That's why we're not going to send troops to fight there.
TwilightGardener
Mar 2014
#45
I don't think we will. I don't see any scenario in which we put US/NATO troops
TwilightGardener
Mar 2014
#51
Yeah, yeah, we got Ukraine to protest its government and the Parliament
TwilightGardener
Mar 2014
#58
Didn't say it was, nor was going to be. By "sphere", I mean Ukraine wanting
TwilightGardener
Mar 2014
#48
incredible. Russia is openly threatening to take over south and east Ukraine. Can the dictator
uhnope
Mar 2014
#25
"Frankly speaking, we don't see any other way for the steady development of the Ukrainian state...
uhnope
Mar 2014
#36
Wrong....not a part of the Russian Federation but as a newly formed Ukraine Federation.
snappyturtle
Mar 2014
#43
Russian Army was "invited" to invade Czechoslovakia in 1968. Same tactics, different dictator
uhnope
Mar 2014
#44
American army was "invited" to invade Vietnam, too. Same tactics, different dictator...
Lars28
Mar 2014
#50
You're calling LBJ a dictator? Really? And admitting Putin is one & that Crimea parallels Vietnam...
uhnope
Mar 2014
#52
Wow, so every US President who had a war during conscription was a "dictator"? lol
EX500rider
Apr 2014
#96
Not openly threatening at this time. But that would be the result, as some in a Ukrianian Federation
freshwest
Mar 2014
#80
What happened in Ukraine is none of their business, it's a foreign country.
Benton D Struckcheon
Mar 2014
#60