Latest Breaking News

Lars28

(84 posts)

45. This is NOT LBN.

Reply to bemildred (Original post)

Wed Apr 2, 2014, 01:40 PM

Apr 2014

It was published on February 10, 2014. The Intercept has been up for a long time.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

48 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Greenwald debuts Omidyar-backed The Intercept [View all] bemildred Feb 2014 OP

It should be renamed "The Profiteer" Renew Deal Feb 2014 #1

That enterpreneurial spirit is so American, isn't it?` bemildred Feb 2014 #2

Thank you, why people excuse this guy is beyond me! Demenace Feb 2014 #3

He is not the owner or even a partner in the company. Luminous Animal Feb 2014 #5

And your proof that they wouldn't be published is what? Renew Deal Feb 2014 #10

No, it's the government who is fucking us. DeSwiss Feb 2014 #34

RIDICULOUS -- in THIS world, as it is, you need big bucks to be heard in the mainstream! cloudythescribbler Feb 2014 #4

Then how did this story get so much attention? Renew Deal Feb 2014 #8

Because they were published by big bucks news orgs. Luminous Animal Feb 2014 #11

Exactly Renew Deal Feb 2014 #17

And Greenwald et al have been publishing quality stuff for other big bucks news orgs. Luminous Animal Feb 2014 #18

And this is good, how? joshcryer Feb 2014 #24

Why do you lie Josh. That shows absolutely nothing. After the cables were dumped by the Guardian, Luminous Animal Feb 2014 #25

Wikileaks had the cables in Feb. They didn't get traction until Dec. joshcryer Feb 2014 #26

You are so wrong. February of 2010 is when Wikileaks received the cables. November of 2010 is when Luminous Animal Feb 2014 #27

The first cable was published 18 February. joshcryer Feb 2014 #29

You are right. Address the rest of my timeline. Luminous Animal Feb 2014 #31

Heh. joshcryer Feb 2014 #32

Yes. I have lived 25 years in my rent controlled spartment Luminous Animal Feb 2014 #38

So you believe that journalists should not get paid? Luminous Animal Feb 2014 #6

Your mistake is calling Greenwald a "journalist" Renew Deal Feb 2014 #7

Vitriol is all you've got. Sad. Comrade Grumpy Feb 2014 #13

Really? Renew Deal Feb 2014 #16

I'll try to remember you said that in about 8 days. Luminous Animal Feb 2014 #14

That's heartless Renew Deal Feb 2014 #15

This is where you lose most everyone LiberalLovinLug Feb 2014 #20

He ***was*** a journalist. Not anymore Renew Deal Feb 2014 #23

Yes. Go back to to occasional articles of interest which of course means publishing near every day.. Luminous Animal Feb 2014 #28

"Manning wasn't a journalist." - Luminous Animal 2014 joshcryer Feb 2014 #33

Read it and weep. Luminous Animal Feb 2014 #39

Oops... Luminous Animal Feb 2014 #41

Of course he should publish his findings and stories...... DeSwiss Feb 2014 #35

I figured "The Intercept" was sort of a clue to the intended content. bemildred Feb 2014 #37

only people you like can make a living? yurbud Feb 2014 #42

!!! oh shit! dionysus Apr 2014 #48

Kind of thin on content so far Blue_Tires Feb 2014 #9

Well, yeah, but we know they have lots of material to work with. nt bemildred Feb 2014 #19

Looking for your insightful critique of the article. Luminous Animal Feb 2014 #30

More power to 'em. Comrade Grumpy Feb 2014 #12

I give it six months. OilemFirchen Feb 2014 #21

We'll see... Blue_Tires Feb 2014 #36

Oh great...Greenwad, The Narcissist, needs more attention to his ego. SoapBox Feb 2014 #22

LOL, Greenwald has the cool, calm temperament, & unbiased opinion needed to professionally lead a FSogol Feb 2014 #40

Kick n/t bobthedrummer Apr 2014 #43

Why the necro? Blue_Tires Apr 2014 #44

This is NOT LBN. Lars28 Apr 2014 #45

Any poster can kick any post at any time. That seems to be what happened here. nt bemildred Apr 2014 #46

Again? Is this a second-chance offer ucrdem Apr 2014 #47