Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jakeXT

(10,575 posts)
9. And who decided that ?
Wed Apr 2, 2014, 04:53 PM
Apr 2014

In the United States, space policy is made by the President of the United States and the United States Congress through the legislative process. In the Executive Office of the President of the United States, the bodies responsible for making space policy include the National Security Council, due to the military and political implications of space policy; the Office of Science and Technology Policy; and the Office of Management and Budget, due to its role in preparing the federal budget. In addition, a separate National Space Council existed at various point in the past.[1]

In the United States Congress, civilian space policy is mainly made by the House Subcommittee on Space and Aeronautics and the Senate Subcommittee on Science and Space, while military and intelligence related activities fall under the purview of the House Subcommittee on Strategic Forces and the Senate Subcommittee on Strategic Forces as well as the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. In addition, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee conducts hearings on proposed space treaties, and the various appropriations committees have power over the budgets for space-related agencies. Space policy efforts are supported by Congressional agencies such as the Congressional Research Service and, until it was disbanded in 1995, the Office of Technology Assessment, as well as the budget-related Congressional Budget Office and Government Accountability Office.[2]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_policy_of_the_United_States

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Bit lame excluding the space station dipsydoodle Apr 2014 #1
They should duel it out up there. JackRiddler Apr 2014 #3
Remember "2010: Odyssey II"? lastlib Apr 2014 #6
Meanwhile, things are not going well on Earth Baclava Apr 2014 #8
Could, but I imagine it would be hard to hit anything in space. LTG Apr 2014 #10
I imagine in reality decompression is a lot worse than in movies neffernin Apr 2014 #13
Decompression would be problem, but probably not fatal. LTG Apr 2014 #21
Wow neffernin Apr 2014 #33
Appears till 2006 the Russian had a "Drilling" as their weapon, but now send a Pistol happyslug Apr 2014 #23
Always thought this an interesting weapon. LTG Apr 2014 #26
So stupid. JackRiddler Apr 2014 #2
Agreed! This, plus the cutbacks in NASA funding may be precursors of a new Dark Age. LongTomH Apr 2014 #4
Future space programs have been handed over to corporations under the guise of cutting deficits. freshwest Apr 2014 #16
The only "progress" we are allowed LongTomH Apr 2014 #18
It could very well be. bananas Apr 2014 #28
Dr. David Webb, formerly of the National Commission on Space, told me essentially the same thing. LongTomH Apr 2014 #29
This is getting ridiculous Boreal Apr 2014 #5
You don't refuse to dance with the guy who brung you Kelvin Mace Apr 2014 #7
And who decided that ? jakeXT Apr 2014 #9
Shush! Android3.14 Apr 2014 #14
Maybe we should make a deal with the Chinese. progressoid Apr 2014 #11
China wanted to participate and Russia tried to lobby for them jakeXT Apr 2014 #15
must be fun for our guys up in the space tin can dembotoz Apr 2014 #12
Planet Earth is blue and there's nothing they can do (nt) Nye Bevan Apr 2014 #22
Perhaps everyone on this thread needs to look at this from a different POV. Benton D Struckcheon Apr 2014 #17
This is a Shame fascisthunter Apr 2014 #19
This is an awesome opportunity CFLDem Apr 2014 #20
Bad idea, IMO, since all those on the Space Station have to work together... Rhiannon12866 Apr 2014 #24
ITAR already highly, ridiculously, limits US-Russian relations. joshcryer Apr 2014 #25
"we don’t need the space relationships...because we don’t have as much going on in space.” jakeXT Apr 2014 #27
How childish. Daniel537 Apr 2014 #30
Aren't they our ride, now that we don't have the Shuttle anymore? Recursion Apr 2014 #31
LOL, that'll show 'em! City Lights Apr 2014 #32
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»NASA suspends relations w...»Reply #9