Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

ACLJ Files Suit Challenging HHS Mandate for Violating Religious Beliefs of Missouri Business Owner rfranklin Mar 2012 #1
All righty then LibertyLover Mar 2012 #29
ACLJ is Pat Robertson's legal org; lastlib Mar 2012 #2
I was just getting ready to Google that proud2BlibKansan Mar 2012 #4
Looks like a legitimate company proud2BlibKansan Mar 2012 #3
St Louis is a major center for industrial refractories - the hedgehog Mar 2012 #6
How does it violate his religious beliefs? Quantess Mar 2012 #5
Yup. Shadowflash Mar 2012 #12
The mandate says any new plan must provide contraceptive products at no cost .... BOHICA12 Mar 2012 #27
I see your point, but I think it's a matter of perpective Quantess Mar 2012 #31
I'm with you there somewhat .... but BOHICA12 Mar 2012 #32
It is an earning for the employee jmowreader Mar 2012 #52
Bingo. aquart Mar 2012 #34
Their Mission Statement Bonhomme Richard Mar 2012 #7
"Mean spirited behavior will not be tolerated. " Old and In the Way Mar 2012 #11
I was thinking about something similar. Control-Z Mar 2012 #24
Don't forget ongoing pediatric care, too. aquart Mar 2012 #35
We will not discriminate based on anyone's personal belief system" crazylikafox Mar 2012 #13
"We will not discriminate based on anyone's belief system." There it is in a nutshell. They are not jwirr Mar 2012 #14
He left one out bongbong Mar 2012 #22
If he has ONE employee that works on a Sunday, he will lose. Ikonoklast Mar 2012 #8
Good luck with that. Where are the damages? caseymoz Mar 2012 #9
All they can show is more costs loyalsister Mar 2012 #38
I argue with my Dad about this. caseymoz Mar 2012 #39
So can a Jehovah's Witness business owner ban covering transfusions? denverbill Mar 2012 #10
There is nothing to stop a JW employer from excluding blood transfusion coverage from kestrel91316 Mar 2012 #15
To stop the slippery slope? The Supreme Court put limits on religious freedom. 1878 Reynolds v. US Brettongarcia Mar 2012 #20
I should have specified that nothing other than the USSC kestrel91316 Mar 2012 #23
That little nagging voice whispers that the last thing the administration wants to do in an election 24601 Mar 2012 #33
Yeah but, earlier legal precedents, disallowing religious exemptions, don't just include tax cases Brettongarcia Mar 2012 #36
oh no starbucks! greymattermom Mar 2012 #26
There is clear legal precedent stopping this joeglow3 Mar 2012 #30
All organizations accepting government funding/regulation, should obey full federal HHS law Brettongarcia Mar 2012 #37
How about everyone else joeglow3 Mar 2012 #43
Lots of cases do not allow private citizens religious exemption from law Brettongarcia Mar 2012 #45
Apples and Oranges joeglow3 Mar 2012 #50
Does the insurance EC Mar 2012 #16
There is something that has been christx30 Mar 2012 #17
Yeah, I've been thinking about that too. EC Mar 2012 #19
Why is he allowed to know what medications his employees are on? Aerows Mar 2012 #18
plain and simple SemperEadem Mar 2012 #21
...and the rightwing crazies are complaining ... la la Mar 2012 #25
I wonder if the Obama Administration didn't start this issue just for this to happen lunatica Mar 2012 #28
question??? onethatcares Mar 2012 #40
Do you mean to imply that this fine, upstanding gentleman, hedgehog Mar 2012 #41
Guess this guys doesn't do birth control.... SamG Mar 2012 #42
Here is a non right wing source alp227 Mar 2012 #44
Thank you for posting that URL for Conwebwatch. So glad to see it. n/t Judi Lynn Mar 2012 #47
I'm pro choice cstanleytech Mar 2012 #46
Under the Health Care Reform, businesses over a certain size must provide hedgehog Mar 2012 #48
Yes I know that its under that however is it constitutional? After all our government does from time cstanleytech Mar 2012 #49
HEY!!! You know what? I have objections about my taxes being used for bogus wars! KansDem Mar 2012 #51
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Missouri Man Is First Pri...»Reply #47