Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Missouri Man Is First Private Business Owner to Sue HHS Over Contraception Mandate [View all]Judi Lynn
(164,130 posts)47. Thank you for posting that URL for Conwebwatch. So glad to see it. n/t
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
52 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Missouri Man Is First Private Business Owner to Sue HHS Over Contraception Mandate [View all]
hedgehog
Mar 2012
OP
ACLJ Files Suit Challenging HHS Mandate for Violating Religious Beliefs of Missouri Business Owner
rfranklin
Mar 2012
#1
The mandate says any new plan must provide contraceptive products at no cost ....
BOHICA12
Mar 2012
#27
"We will not discriminate based on anyone's belief system." There it is in a nutshell. They are not
jwirr
Mar 2012
#14
There is nothing to stop a JW employer from excluding blood transfusion coverage from
kestrel91316
Mar 2012
#15
To stop the slippery slope? The Supreme Court put limits on religious freedom. 1878 Reynolds v. US
Brettongarcia
Mar 2012
#20
That little nagging voice whispers that the last thing the administration wants to do in an election
24601
Mar 2012
#33
Yeah but, earlier legal precedents, disallowing religious exemptions, don't just include tax cases
Brettongarcia
Mar 2012
#36
All organizations accepting government funding/regulation, should obey full federal HHS law
Brettongarcia
Mar 2012
#37
I wonder if the Obama Administration didn't start this issue just for this to happen
lunatica
Mar 2012
#28
Yes I know that its under that however is it constitutional? After all our government does from time
cstanleytech
Mar 2012
#49
HEY!!! You know what? I have objections about my taxes being used for bogus wars!
KansDem
Mar 2012
#51