Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
14. Q: When did US and Israeli intel reach the conclusion? Before Natanyahu extracted the "no contain-
Sun Mar 18, 2012, 04:22 PM
Mar 2012

ment" pledge from Obama, most certainly. So, then, what was the point of the grandstanding if it's, in fact, agreed that there is no Iranian weapons program to draw a line in the sand over?

More kabuki theater and endless provocation of the other side. Endless creation of anxiety among the American people. Thanks a lot, Barack. All you had to do was just come out and tell us this before Netanyahu came to town. But, then there would be nothing for Bibi to take home to his political constituents. Now, Bibi can say, "See, the Americans will attack Iran if they get the bomb."

For those who read the NYT story, it gets worse. The article identifies the trigger that would now send the US to war against Iran:

Today, as suspicions about Iran’s nuclear ambitions have provoked tough sanctions and threats of military confrontation, top administration officials have said that Iran still has not decided to pursue a weapon, reflecting the intelligence community’s secret analysis. But if that assessment changes, it could lift a brake set by President Obama, who has not ruled out military options as a last resort to prevent Iran gaining nuclear arms.


So, the net result of all this is to move the goal posts closer to war. I am not greatly encouraged.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

If true this could go a ways to helping diffuse alot of the anxiety over Irans nuke program cstanleytech Mar 2012 #1
Anxiety relief, maybe, but the NYT story identifies the trigger that would send the US into war: leveymg Mar 2012 #16
I read it the way its written because it says "if" it doesnt say that he will do it and really cstanleytech Mar 2012 #19
US, Israel agree no one fell for it. saras Mar 2012 #2
??? What are you saying? ChairmanAgnostic Mar 2012 #7
my guess on what the other poster said Bodhi BloodWave Mar 2012 #13
They'll keep throwing that crap against the wall until something sticks. harun Mar 2012 #18
Now what are the GOP candidates going to talk about????? Oh yeah - jillan Mar 2012 #3
I agree intaglio Mar 2012 #4
I never thought i would read that in the Jerusalem Post Lars77 Mar 2012 #5
If you read the NYT story that identifies the trigger for war, we just moved closer to war. leveymg Mar 2012 #15
well, that's no reason to stop saber rattling. KG Mar 2012 #6
Not when there are aerospace industry appropriations to be made! Kolesar Mar 2012 #8
Indeed. Why let facts get in the way of a war? n/t Chan790 Mar 2012 #11
I'll believe this when gas prices go down jpak Mar 2012 #9
Who will be Netanyahu's next boogeyman? nt Poll_Blind Mar 2012 #10
Hezbollah or Hamas? Chan790 Mar 2012 #12
Q: When did US and Israeli intel reach the conclusion? Before Natanyahu extracted the "no contain- leveymg Mar 2012 #14
Now will the warmongering chickenhawks shut up? Oh, forgot, they're paid to talk. Good news, anyway. freshwest Mar 2012 #17
Then for them to bomb Iran would be pure terrorism. The Stranger Mar 2012 #20
Time to tone down this overheated "rhetoric" then agentS Mar 2012 #21
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»'US, Israel agree Iran ab...»Reply #14