Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Russia seeks over $11b in ‘debt’ from Ukraine: Gazprom. [View all]okaawhatever
(9,565 posts)18. Yes they were. The Partition Treaty of 1997 divided up the assets.
The Partition Treaty on the Status and Conditions of the Black Sea Fleet was a treaty signed between Russia and Ukraine on 28 May 1997 whereby the two countries established two independent national fleets, and divided armaments and bases between them.[2][3] Under the treaty, the Black Sea Fleet that was located in the Crimean peninsula at the time, was partitioned between Russia (81.7%) and Ukraine (18.3%), with Russia maintaining the right to use the Port of Sevastopol in Ukraine for 20 years until 2017.[4] The treaty also allowed Russia to maintain up to 25,000 troops, 24 artillery systems, 132 armored vehicles, and 22 military planes on the Crimean peninsula.
Subtelny, Orest (2000). Ukraine: A History. University of Toronto Press. p. 600. ISBN 0-8020-8390-0.
Full text of the treaty:
http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/643_076
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
36 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Their discount still had Ukraine paying more for gas than the EU. Here's a chart of what Ukraine
okaawhatever
Apr 2014
#2
Yes, but that is per 100 kilometers. You have to multiply the dollar amount by the travel distance
okaawhatever
Apr 2014
#6
Not to mention - if Russia can change the price of gas; why can't Ukraine change the
karynnj
Apr 2014
#17
Exactly.The problem is, that the Ukraine pipelines service Europe. So hurting those
okaawhatever
Apr 2014
#19
Ukraine has done that. They've attempted a few times, but last year they bought a bunch of gas
okaawhatever
Apr 2014
#20
Are you saying that because Putin broke the treaty he shouldn't have to pay for the Ukrainian ships
okaawhatever
Apr 2014
#27
Putin owes Ukraine billions in the items he looted!! instead hes trying to scam Ukraine
Sunlei
Apr 2014
#30
perhaps Russia should get rid of Putin before he harms their crummy economy even more.
Sunlei
Apr 2014
#31
Oh no, better than that. They used the base for at least 3 of the 7 years the gas deal was good for.
okaawhatever
Apr 2014
#7
I've not seen anything to demonstrate these were part of the lease payment payments.
dipsydoodle
Apr 2014
#8
Exactly. I was just looking up something about that deal and found a statement made by
okaawhatever
Apr 2014
#26
That's how it strikes me, too. And from this thread, it appears Ukrainians were given no incentive
freshwest
Apr 2014
#36
Lets deduct that 11 billion "scam" from what russia embezzeled from Ukraine over the decades
Sunlei
Apr 2014
#23