Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RainDog

(28,784 posts)
59. Then there's this
Sat Apr 5, 2014, 10:31 PM
Apr 2014

I mentioned, upthread, the hemp provision of the farm bill that allows hemp to be grown for research via state agr. offices and universities - Congress has to reckon with hemp's illegal status regarding this product.

Congress also has to allow or block the DC's City Council decriminalization bill that was passed in March. The bill has to stay with the federal Congress for 60 days before it goes into law.

Guess who's part of the committee that deals with this? Issa - one of the same Republicans who signed the bill to be able to sue the President for not enforcing federal mj law.

The measure removes criminal penalties for possession of up to one ounce of marijuana for individuals 18 years of age and older and replaces them with a civil fine of $25, similar to a parking ticket. It also removes penalties for possession of paraphernalia in conjunction with small amounts of marijuana, and it specifies that individuals cannot be searched or detained based solely on an officer’s suspicion of marijuana possession. Public use of marijuana would remain a criminal offense punishable by up to 60 days in jail and a fine of up to $500. Currently, possession of any amount of marijuana is a criminal offense punishable by up to six months in jail and a fine of up to $1,000.


Nationally, according to a 2012 report by the American Civil Liberties Union, black people are almost four times as likely as white people to be arrested for marijuana possession, despite the fact that whites and blacks use marijuana at similar rates.

That may sound shocking, but in D.C. the disparity is even greater.


It took Congress 10 years to fund DC's medical mj law - but this one doesn't require Congressional funding.

Now - if Congress allows this law to pass for DC - does that mean they are applying the law unequally not to decriminalize per the DC measure, at the Federal level, for every state?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

That's excellent. Bluenorthwest Apr 2014 #1
At this point, CONgress is not a welcome addition to anything. appal_jack Apr 2014 #31
We've had this "debate" before ... 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2014 #48
Well, Congress makes law. If the law is to be changed, without any suggestions that MADem Apr 2014 #67
Then shut up and just do it! Kelvin Mace Apr 2014 #2
Exactly. polichick Apr 2014 #52
BS. Doesnt Need Them billhicks76 Apr 2014 #74
No, he doesn't...but he does RainDog Apr 2014 #81
Saying you want to consult with the Republicans Kelvin Mace Apr 2014 #84
Congress is too busy trying to have him tossed out of office for being black on the job. Spitfire of ATJ Apr 2014 #3
Just do it! cui bono Apr 2014 #4
now he can blame congress instead of the administration lol nt msongs Apr 2014 #5
This is an issue for Congress RainDog Apr 2014 #6
Sad state of affairs ... but so unfortunately true ... nt MindMover Apr 2014 #8
It's funny that Republicans are suddenly big federal govt. supporters RainDog Apr 2014 #9
and AMEN ... democracy costs tooo much ... nt MindMover Apr 2014 #10
btw, would you mind reposting this RainDog Apr 2014 #11
sure ... MindMover Apr 2014 #12
It's funny how now that Rick Perry is not running for Texas Governor again his opinions are Dustlawyer Apr 2014 #14
I'm hoping it's possible to appeal to the fiscal side RainDog Apr 2014 #17
Thank you AG Holder! Cha Apr 2014 #7
KnR Hekate Apr 2014 #13
If Holder has the power under the CSA to remove marijuana from the Schedule I list mountain grammy Apr 2014 #15
This is election year politics Grammy, keep the issue hot for the election. bemildred Apr 2014 #37
good advice, and yes, it would. mountain grammy Apr 2014 #39
It Could be a VERY Bad Thing AndyTiedye Apr 2014 #77
This Congress is largely incapable of addressing anything. nt bemildred Apr 2014 #82
He should drop it down to the same schedule as parsley and thyme. AAO Apr 2014 #44
for sure! mountain grammy Apr 2014 #47
Don't forget sage and rosemary. :) polichick Apr 2014 #51
We could make a song out of that! AAO Apr 2014 #56
Yep! Here it is from The Concert in Central Park... polichick Apr 2014 #57
He has the (shared) power to ... 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2014 #68
passing the buck Enrique Apr 2014 #16
Just election year rhetoric without action... polichick Apr 2014 #53
This isn't the first time Holder has passed up doing..... idendoit Apr 2014 #18
It should be up to the medical community, like women's health. ehrnst Apr 2014 #19
I laugh when Republicans say RainDog Apr 2014 #21
Unfortunately ... Big Money again ... but we are finally getting to know exactly who they are ... MindMover Apr 2014 #23
This medicine helps people SHRED Apr 2014 #20
In context - isn't this challenge? RainDog Apr 2014 #22
Let them howl SHRED Apr 2014 #32
Gupta's reports RainDog Apr 2014 #33
But what about all the lost jobs? RoccoR5955 Apr 2014 #24
This message was self-deleted by its author RainDog Apr 2014 #25
K&R!!! That, would be a smart move. We waste far too much money and lives on RKP5637 Apr 2014 #26
More nonsense fron the nonsense administration. What's with these guys? PSPS Apr 2014 #27
Righteous indignation ... hmmmmmmm MindMover Apr 2014 #28
"Remember. When you are indignant, you can't be fully with the people you love here at DU..." jtuck004 Apr 2014 #34
Congress? WORK?? HAHAHAHA DiverDave Apr 2014 #29
It would put the ball in their court, so to speak. rickyhall Apr 2014 #30
slow train comin otherone Apr 2014 #35
Rescheduling is not a pancea and would not accomplish what most people think it would Sgent Apr 2014 #36
Prescription drug lobby The Wizard Apr 2014 #38
What's Congress got to do with it, Mr Holder? malthaussen Apr 2014 #40
'Expertise exists in Congress." I almost choked on that gem. Wish to God they did have expertise. Stardust Apr 2014 #55
Tap dance. Feral Child Apr 2014 #41
The administration could do that without Congress...this is just politicking. Means little NorthCarolina Apr 2014 #42
I don't believe a word that prick says. Lars28 Apr 2014 #43
Me neither. Tarnation6 Apr 2014 #71
He is an untrustworthy bait-the-trap SOB. Manuel Beingman Apr 2014 #79
What's the difference between Eric Holder and the snake in the Garden? aurelio17 Apr 2014 #80
I had a spark of hope there for a moment... Out of Time Man Apr 2014 #45
I'd be impressed if voters would elect representatives in their own states to congress to do it. freshwest Apr 2014 #49
and AMEN ... nt MindMover Apr 2014 #50
yes yes tazkcmo Apr 2014 #70
Thanks. freshwest Apr 2014 #72
Don't get me wrong... Out of Time Man Apr 2014 #76
I agree. n/t tazkcmo Apr 2014 #83
Exactly. Pun intended, it is a cop out. Warren Stupidity Apr 2014 #73
The end time for pot prohibition is coming. Comrade Grumpy Apr 2014 #46
Yes, whether Eric Holder likes it or not. aurelio17 Apr 2014 #75
He doesn't need the approval of Congress or anybody else to do it. kestrel91316 Apr 2014 #54
Right, but.... aurelio17 Apr 2014 #85
Wonder what is meant by "abuse" in "high potential for abuse"? Trillo Apr 2014 #58
Then there's this RainDog Apr 2014 #59
And the plot thickens .... MindMover Apr 2014 #60
This message was self-deleted by its author RainDog Apr 2014 #61
Write on, PLEASE ... you have enough posts on the subject just in DU ... MindMover Apr 2014 #62
... RainDog Apr 2014 #63
Thank you for considering and keep me posted on the project .... nt MindMover Apr 2014 #64
well, back to "reality" RainDog Apr 2014 #65
Most of the time there excuse is, "the people do not know what is best for them " MindMover Apr 2014 #66
If left to congress, I doubt it will happen... wildbilln864 Apr 2014 #69
Hey Eric! DeSwiss Apr 2014 #78
Eric is the latest warrant46 Apr 2014 #86
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Eric Holder Would Be 'Gla...»Reply #59