Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Russia says expects answers on NATO troops in eastern Europe [View all]another_liberal
(8,821 posts)89. Your cryptic insult . . .
How so? Your cryptic insult specified no single target.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
93 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If one parses the first sentence of the article correctly, there is but ONE possible refferant. n/t
ColesCountyDem
Apr 2014
#77
I'm sure you can find more "news" from him on any site mentioning Maduro or Venezuela.
7962
Apr 2014
#53
da comrade, the NATO troops have been goosestepping through Kiev for days nows.
dionysus
Apr 2014
#64
Oh yeah! The World is a much better place since the Pax Americana took over . . .
another_liberal
Apr 2014
#90
Yes, because that would show Putin, all right! I bet he'd cower at the sight of .....nothing.
7962
Apr 2014
#54
it's okay, they are countered by the armchair spetsnaz and amatuer pravda reporters...
dionysus
Apr 2014
#65
^ +1 (but I suspect the example being set in this case will be much like Bush and Cheney's)
groundloop
Apr 2014
#13
That Is True, Sir, But Mr. Lavrov Here Is As Ridiculous An Any Invoking Munich
The Magistrate
Apr 2014
#21
Yes, we watched and waited while we sold, leased and lended you and the French
amandabeech
Apr 2014
#83
I fully recognise that you were profiting from both sides (allies more than axis) ...
Nihil
Apr 2014
#84
That may refer to the agreement which was associated with the reunifaction of Germany.
dipsydoodle
Apr 2014
#43
expensive Russia, to keep all those troops standing around doing nothing.? I bet they're having off
Sunlei
Apr 2014
#51
NATO reacting in a completely expected and logical way. If Russia pulls its
TwilightGardener
Apr 2014
#60
How about beyond the Urals. Yeah that sounds about right I'll settle for that.
Leontius
Apr 2014
#63
Rather than pick a distance in miles, how about choosing parity in numbers and materiel? n/t
ColesCountyDem
Apr 2014
#73