Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Former CIA director: Sen. Feinstein is too ‘emotional’ to investigate torture [View all]plantwomyn
(877 posts)72. You obviously didn'r see her speech on the floor.
The fact is that Feinstein has been on the Intelligence Committee throughout all of the torture and NSA violations. In short she has known all along and couldn't say a word about it. If she was "emotional" she would have called them out in 2002 or 2003. I know quite a few octogenarians that I would put against just about any young'un in a debate. I wouldn't give the vast majority of the Senators in office today a chance against her.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
72 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Former CIA director: Sen. Feinstein is too ‘emotional’ to investigate torture [View all]
MindMover
Apr 2014
OP
oh, those wimmin...we let 'em vote and then they get in office and they're just
CTyankee
Apr 2014
#1
Appears to be no end to the misogny at Faux. It must be the GOP's newest mantra.
freshwest
Apr 2014
#44
You likely were being sarcastic. I'm male and would be considered very emotional. Anyone that has
24601
Apr 2014
#56
Just out of curiosity, how then do you deal with a president that ordered a drone strike on a
24601
Apr 2014
#60
Are the "war zones" Iraq (Past) and Afghanistan (present)? Or did the AUMF after 9/11 cover the
24601
Apr 2014
#69
Where is it clear that a preemptive strike is illegal? Where does it say we have to absorb a 1st
24601
Apr 2014
#71
Republicans have a cruel streak. It's part of their nature, the reason for being Republicans.
Enthusiast
Apr 2014
#50
Dude-- I think that dog whistle isn't gonna attract the kinda dogs you want. n/t
TygrBright
Apr 2014
#36
mikey, dear, your clueless, desperation-fueled sexism is showing. I would suggest seppuku,
niyad
Apr 2014
#39
Jeffrey Dahmer, as with Michael Hayden saw nothing wrong with such horrid actions.
Dawson Leery
Apr 2014
#43
Michael Hayden is too crooked to hold a position of trust in a democratic government
Jack Rabbit
Apr 2014
#52
Why hasn't this neo-Nazi piece of shit been prosecuted yet for lying to Congress?
The Stranger
Apr 2014
#57
That nasty little tendency of women to apply emotional intelligence to pain being inflicted on
toby jo
Apr 2014
#63
She was the one who held it all together after Moscone and Milk were killed by Dan White.
Arugula Latte
Apr 2014
#66