Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

happyslug

(14,779 posts)
51. What military Deterrent????
Fri Apr 11, 2014, 02:01 PM
Apr 2014

The Ukraine is NOT a member of NATO and has no base presently adapted for NATO. The Black Sea has been a Russian Lake since the time of Catherine the Great and no Carriers are permitted to enter the Black sea UNLESS they have a secondary function as an anti-submarine ship (Thus all Soviet carriers had Anti-Marine capacity, so they could go through the Straits).

Now, Turkey could break its treaty in regards to the Straits between the Mediterranean and Black seas, but that would risk a cut off of its natural gas supplies from Iran (who is closely allied with Russia right now). A second concern, through it appears to be minor today, is what will Greece do? Greece, like Turkey is a member of NATO, but synthetic to Russia. In fact prior to Greece recent economic melt down, Greece was the #1 support for the Kurdish rebels in Southeast Turkey (Greece supplied guns and ammunition, but none that could be traced back to Turkey).

Romania is now a member of NATO, but has poor infrastructure, worse then the Ukraine. The nearest bases that meets minimum NATO needs are in Poland. Thus does Poland want to make Russia mad at Poland by supporting the Ukraine? Especially since many of the supporters of the present Government are supporters of people who killed Poles during WWII and have said that parts of Modern Poland should be Ukrainian AND the Poles that are in the Ukraine should be sent to Poland?

Thus the problem is HOW does the US respond to a overt Military action by Russia? And if Russia just moves into area where they are a large Russian speaking population, how does the US drive out the Russian Army while appearing NOT to drive out the Russian Speakers? The later is important for such actions is a war crime, civilians must be protected, even if they are hostile to the invaders.

A complication is fuel, What will NATO and the US do if Russia cuts off not only the Natural Gas flow into Europe but also Russian Oil? Now, Russia is the #2 oil EXPORTER in the world, if it would cut back exports that would cause a world wide increase in the price of oil. What would you do if the price of oil hits $10 a gallon? I remember 1973, when the US was importing less the 5% of its oil, and OPEC cut off oil supplies for just three months, and you saw the price of gasoline double almost overnight. It was another period of tight oil supplies, The North Sea, the North Slope and the huge Siberian fields would not open till the mid 1970s. Today we have a similar tight oil situation, a cut off of oil supplies could lead to a doubling of the price of oil as it did in 1973.

Side note: in 1990 the US expelled Iraq from Kuwait, and shut off Iraqi oil from the world market place, but that was during the oil glut of the 1980s and 1990s where the supply of oil was so large that the price kept dropping. Saudi Arabia had to step in a cut its own production in the 1980s to keep up the price of oil. Thus in 1990 you had surplus oil capacity and Iraq's oil was NOT needed to meet world wide demand for oil. The problem is that in 2014 we would need Russia oil to keep the price of oil from doubling, if Russia does not export, the market for oil is so tight the price of oil could double over night (and some people with access to better numbers then I have, say that may be cheap, it could triple).

Russia is already trying to ditch the dollar for its foreign exchange, it has sold oil to China in Rubles and Yuans not Dollars, Russia has accepted Iranian oil in exchange for Russia goods again avoiding the use of the Dollar.

Just to point out three things:

1. US military action in regards to the Ukraine is limited, due to its location and the lack of US bases around that area and the restrictions on Carriers entering the Black Sea.

2. The US has addicted to oil, and anything that stops the flow of oil will hit the US hard. Unlike 1991 or even 2003, the market for oil is extremely tight. The US could attack, but Russia's best defense may be to cut off energy supplies to Europe. The sources of that energy is even deeper in Russia, and the closest nation to it is Red China.

3. Russia has one of the largest hold of US dollars, thus Russia can spend that money even if trade is completely cut off.

4. The Fuel for US Troops in Afghanistan comes from Russia, if the US attacks Russian Forces in the Ukraine, the first thing Putin will do is cut off that fuel line. It is Spring and the mountain passes between Afghanistan and Pakistan are open again, and the winter wheat crop is growing and will be harvested in a few months. At that point the Summer Fighting season in Afghanistan will begin, for the crop be in and the Rural supporters of the Taliban would be free to fight. This is all contingent on Pakistan keeping the two passes between Afghanistan and Pakistan open. Pakistan may demand higher pay to permit supplies through, AND Russia could send in its won Special Forces to aid the Taliban to destroy those conveys.

Now, Russia would be hurt by all three of the above action, but Russia knew that before it took the Crimea and found that taking Crimea was worth more then the potential harms. I suspect Putin has accepted that he will have to cut off Oil and Natural Gas to Europe to stop the US (Thus the recent German Chancellor's comment that Putin was Nuts, which implies to me the Chancellor has been told of Putin's options by her own military and hates them, for it would hurt Germany the most).

Thus would GERMANY permit the US to use its bases against Russia? And by German Basis I include the US bases in Germany, not German bases in Germany. Chancellor Merkel appears to be in a bind, a bind she hopes to get out of. The bind is appeasing the US by showing Germany under her is a loyal ally of the US, while trying to appease Putin so Putin does cut of the Natural gas and oil flow into Germany. Merkel dare not call the American President Insane, but Putin she can without suffering any internal German political harm.

My point is Obama's and the US's option as to the Ukraine are limited. The Military option may not even be on the table, do to objections from Turkey, Romania, Poland and Germany (objections given the the US, but NOT released to the Press) and the US own Military in regards to US troops in Afghanistan.

Also remember the largest opposition to Putin inside Russia itself is the Communist Party. You do not hear much about it in the US, for the US tends to talk about the non-communist opposition to Putin, who are small in numbers compared to the Communists. Given how the Coup in Kiev took place and the subsequent rough treatment of Communist party members in the Ukraine, the Communist Party of Russia supports Putin when it comes to the Ukraine.

In simple terms, as long as Putin keeps any Russian Forces no further West then Kiev itself, the US will do nothing. Even if the US did do something, it would be to operate in an hostile population area, which is what the Russian Speaking parts of the Ukraine will be (much like Iraq and Afghanistan and even Vietnam). How do you keep a people in one country, when they want to join another? That is the problem when it comes to Eastern Ukraine and maybe even Southern Ukraine. Now Western and Central Ukraine would be friendly to NATO invading army, but then how would an American Commander handle such "friends" when he or she starts to see them murder Russian Speaking civilians and the army moves East?

Thus Russia has options to attack the US, the price of oil is the biggest weapon. We could destroy those pipelines, but then the Oil still does not get to the west. Ukraine still uses Russian Gauge Railroads, so any invasion would require switching trains on the border of Poland and the Ukraine, or moving the tanks by themselves till they get to the battle field. Air power will have to come from Germany and Poland, both of which would be hit the hardest by a shut off of Russian oil.

Sorry, the Ukraine in 2014 is NOT Iraq in 1991 or 2003. The world is different, oil is now tight, as are supplies of Grain (Russia is still one of the top grain exporters, remember the Arab Spring followed Putin's cut off of Russian Grain exports the year before, that shut off kept Russia break prices down, but drove up the price of bread in the Middle East and the result was unrest and the Arab Spring. Does the US want another Arab Spring, this time against even more US allies?). I do not think so, I suspect the Colonels and Navy Captains in the Pentagon has told the Obama administration the above sad facts of life and thus the military option is off the table.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Now the MIC wants American troops to die in Eastern Europe. former9thward Apr 2014 #1
The Less Americans Know About Ukraine’s Location, The More They Want U.S. To Intervene Purveyor Apr 2014 #3
Thats about the shittiest interactive map I've ever seen 7962 Apr 2014 #6
The results are better then I would expect, most people hit around the area of the Ukraine. happyslug Apr 2014 #30
There going to kill you either by a war or die because you can't afford medical care . geretogo Apr 2014 #10
MOB 840high Apr 2014 #2
The article doesn't make it clear we're only going into NATO countries. That would exclude Ukraine okaawhatever Apr 2014 #4
Good... hoosierlib Apr 2014 #5
Ukraine isnt a member of NATO, so you wouldnt be going there. nt 7962 Apr 2014 #7
Budapest Memerandom or... hoosierlib Apr 2014 #20
The Budapest Memorandum isnt binding. Supporting NATO allies still wont put u in Ukraine. 7962 Apr 2014 #23
At what point? hoosierlib Apr 2014 #25
At what point is the Ukrainian military going to move to their borders? 7962 Apr 2014 #31
I saw something the other day that said that Ukraine was mobilizing and amandabeech Apr 2014 #40
Which is what ran Russia out of Afghanistan. I guess thats an option. 7962 Apr 2014 #42
Some of the folks on the Maidan were Afghan war vets. amandabeech Apr 2014 #52
The 1994 Budapest Memorandom???? All it says the US will ask the UN Security Council. happyslug Apr 2014 #34
And this case... hoosierlib Apr 2014 #39
What military Deterrent???? happyslug Apr 2014 #51
The one in Germany... hoosierlib Apr 2014 #56
What division is in Germany? AnalystInParadise Apr 2014 #58
Let me help you grapple with reality AnalystInParadise Apr 2014 #59
Why do you need NATO? Boreal Apr 2014 #53
really? PaulKersey Apr 2014 #16
Yes... hoosierlib Apr 2014 #19
Gung ho for war or not....you won't be going. go west young man Apr 2014 #32
To NATO countries. I doubt Putin would dare try shit, but if he does... TwilightGardener Apr 2014 #8
What's on...You itching for another WAR? KoKo Apr 2014 #22
I'm not. Putin might be, though. What I'm stating is fact. TwilightGardener Apr 2014 #35
Those Russian speakers in east Ukraine Boreal Apr 2014 #55
You do realize AnalystInParadise Apr 2014 #57
Substantially weaker than with them, but still quite formidable. WatermelonRat Apr 2014 #61
This message was self-deleted by its author geretogo Apr 2014 #9
& how long can Putin go without some war or gaybashing law or whatever wag the dog uhnope Apr 2014 #11
This message was self-deleted by its author geretogo Apr 2014 #13
This message was self-deleted by its author uhnope Apr 2014 #14
"We were the first to use Nuclear Weapons to insure our Corporations won" ?!?! EX500rider Apr 2014 #15
^^^^^^This! 7962 Apr 2014 #24
Someone Actually Posted That, Sir? The Magistrate Apr 2014 #41
Yeah since deleted but wow what a crock. n/t EX500rider Apr 2014 #60
So the Baltics and perhaps Moldova. Igel Apr 2014 #12
insanity PaulKersey Apr 2014 #17
Tried that in 1939... hoosierlib Apr 2014 #21
The Military Industrial Complex just screamed, "Bingo!" another_liberal Apr 2014 #18
The NATO countries are ignoring nyabingi Apr 2014 #26
China seems conflicted about the issue, as a lot of people are: bemildred Apr 2014 #43
Indeed, Sir, Given Their Own Situation And Ambitions, They Can Hardly Commit Either Way The Magistrate Apr 2014 #44
Lots of countries with separatist movements these days. It's always an awkward subject. bemildred Apr 2014 #45
And They Covet A Few Bits Beyond Their Borders Themselves, Sir The Magistrate Apr 2014 #46
Well, at least in that piece they seem to see the problem. bemildred Apr 2014 #47
It Is An Excellent Piece, Sir The Magistrate Apr 2014 #48
I thought so too, Sir. nt bemildred Apr 2014 #49
Interesting item to note from the primary article, "Foreign ministers of the 28-nation alliance have 24601 Apr 2014 #27
Like. 840high Apr 2014 #29
Breedlove is right out of Dr. Strangelove.... go west young man Apr 2014 #33
I couldn't disagree more. He's doing what he has been tasked to do by the NATO political 24601 Apr 2014 #36
Gotta do what we gotta do CFLDem Apr 2014 #28
And away we go. nt Javaman Apr 2014 #37
K&R...Thanks for posting red dog 1 Apr 2014 #38
Exactly what troops are they going to send? AnalystInParadise Apr 2014 #50
Europeans haven't been too keen Boreal Apr 2014 #54
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Top NATO Commander: U.S. ...»Reply #51