Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: BREAKING NEWS: Major development in Bunkerville cattle battle [View all]politicman
(710 posts)don't agree with the court order.
Regardless if you think that this cattle rancher has a good argument, regardless if you think that no blood should be spilt over cattle grazing on federal land, the point remains that this guy and his armed friends defied a court order.
Look, we may not all agree with the policies and laws of government but that's the reason we have courts.
This guy had an argument, the federal government had their argument, a court decided that their argument was better thus they issued a court order.
Just because this guy does not like the court order, it doesn't mean that the government should let him get away with not complying to that order just because he has mates with guns.
Imagine the next time that a guy gets convicted for a crime and sentenced to jail, then his supporters come in with weapons and argue that the court order is wrong and he better not be locked up.
Do any of you seriously think that the government would decide to not follow through on the court ordered sentence because there might be some bloodshed with his supporters?