Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Xithras

(16,191 posts)
24. For those wondering why he isn't/hasn't been charged criminally.
Thu Apr 17, 2014, 01:11 PM
Apr 2014

In Hawaii, the age of sexual consent is 16, so he can't be charged under that states child molestation laws. Additionally, the maximum statute of limitations on sexual assault cases in 6 years in Hawaii, with a delay for those under 18 that stops the clock until the 18th birthday is reached. After that extension, the limitation was reached in 2006.

In California, the statute of limitations for non-aggravated rape (rape that does not involve a weapon or major bodily injury) is also six years. Aggravated rape charges have no statute of limitations in California, but can ONLY be filed if the prosecutor can prove that one of the "Aggravated" qualifiers exist...an impossible feat at this point without photos or a police report.

He could, theoretically, be charged under a federal law that makes it a crime to transport minors across state lines for sex, even when those states have ages of consent under 18. Unfortunately, that law ONLY applies if the minor was transported between states for the purpose of sexual contact. If they were transported across state lines for other purposes, and sexual contact later occurs (whether consensual or otherwise)...the law doesn't apply. It was written specifically to prevent people from taking teens to states with a lower age of consent for sex, and doesn't really apply beyond that. In order to convict under that law, simply proving sex or rape wouldn't be enough...the prosecution would have to prove that Singer took the boy to Hawaii in order to rape him. Again, we're talking about a nearly impossible feat at this late date.

In other words, criminal prosecution is not possible.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Have to wait and see Prophet 451 Apr 2014 #1
Agreed. SoapBox Apr 2014 #2
Variety, unfortunately for Singer, wouldn't say this if they didn't have the facts. joshcryer Apr 2014 #4
Well, the article just reports the accusation Prophet 451 Apr 2014 #6
Feldman wrote about it in his book in great detail LordGlenconner Apr 2014 #45
Umm. . .do you know how common this is? As a producer friend told me seven years ago Nanjing to Seoul Apr 2014 #3
it may be very common qazplm Apr 2014 #9
The standard of protection for children can not be based upon the profession of assailant. FarPoint Apr 2014 #10
I know. . .let's just say it happes in The Biz alot and most of the children are cocered into Nanjing to Seoul Apr 2014 #11
We confronted the priest when it was said to be impossible. FarPoint Apr 2014 #13
So was slavery once. Doesn't matter. It's criminal and evil. closeupready Apr 2014 #18
Agreed, but don't be surprised if some of our liberal heroes partake in this kind of evil shit. Nanjing to Seoul Apr 2014 #19
This will have some worrying/scurrying Bosonic Apr 2014 #5
As tough as it is, you shouldn't judge. Socal31 Apr 2014 #7
Of course I have no idea what happened pipoman Apr 2014 #8
I disagree with your analysis of "boy or child" under the age of 18 being disingenuous. FarPoint Apr 2014 #12
You have to draw the line somewhere, when it comes to the law. /nt Ash_F Apr 2014 #15
Call him a "minor." Accurate and without emotive connotations. Comrade Grumpy Apr 2014 #16
Funny.... AlbertCat Apr 2014 #20
The word "forcibly" was used... awoke_in_2003 Apr 2014 #26
not funny itsrobert Apr 2014 #27
Oh please.... AlbertCat Apr 2014 #39
If the minor is below the age of consent BainsBane Apr 2014 #42
Egan's parents let him fly to Hawaii with an older man? LiberalArkie Apr 2014 #14
on more than one occasion Doctor_J Apr 2014 #31
Sounds opportunistic to me SpankMe Apr 2014 #17
I agree with some of your points, however did you feel the same way about delayed reporting Exultant Democracy Apr 2014 #23
His post makes clear it isn't only time dsc Apr 2014 #29
17 and 33? Yes, that is an outrageous age difference! LongTomH Apr 2014 #25
Luckily, the age of consent is 17 where I live Reter Apr 2014 #33
The point is, that a relation between a person in their 30s and a teenager is almost certainly...... LongTomH Apr 2014 #34
what? if you are gay you cant be rape? itsrobert Apr 2014 #28
'if you're really suffering" BainsBane Apr 2014 #43
There's just too much JustAnotherGen Apr 2014 #44
Does this mean that Singer's next project will be a Batman & Robin remake? Tom Ripley Apr 2014 #21
what's that supposed to mean? nt alp227 Apr 2014 #32
If he is actually going to name additional names next week... Tom Ripley Apr 2014 #36
I still don't understand. nt alp227 Apr 2014 #37
Maybe this wasn't rape-rape, as Whoopi characterized it. closeupready Apr 2014 #22
For those wondering why he isn't/hasn't been charged criminally. Xithras Apr 2014 #24
Considering the lawyer says he is bringing three more cases next week and naming names Godhumor Apr 2014 #30
or do you mean "Pays out" ??? n/t progressivebydesign Apr 2014 #41
Followup: AP: Man details abuse claims against 'X-Men' director PoliticAverse Apr 2014 #35
I believe him. K&R closeupready Apr 2014 #38
Curious.. 1999?? progressivebydesign Apr 2014 #40
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»‘X-Men’ Director Bryan Si...»Reply #24