Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Igel

(37,614 posts)

21. Yes, it's possible.

Reply to JI7 (Reply #2)

Mon Apr 28, 2014, 08:19 PM

Apr 2014

So the previous farce spared 492 out of 529. That means only 37 people are still going to be executed with a fair trial and chance to defend themselves, while we're relieved that 492 are only going to be put into prison for life in a rather nasty penal system.

Truly, Lakoff would like the framing.

Same here, no doubt. We'll rejoice that of the 600+ only, perhaps, 50 or 60 will be executed based on government claims and the rest sentenced to prisons for life based on allegations.

It's been said that if your dog is hungry you can cut off its tail, cook it, and it'll be grateful to you for the food.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

29 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Egypt: Brotherhood's Badie among mass death sentences [View all] dipsydoodle Apr 2014 OP

And remember, there are dozens of DU'ers who support this Scootaloo Apr 2014 #1

Yes, but they've been very, very quiet lately. Comrade Grumpy Apr 2014 #3

Well, it's certainly not because they've been banned... Scootaloo Apr 2014 #4

I have No Particular Objection To This, Sir The Magistrate Apr 2014 #5

Thanks for going on the record. Military dictatorships rock! Comrade Grumpy Apr 2014 #6

Compared To Theocratic Dictatorships, Comrade, Yes The Magistrate Apr 2014 #7

The Muslim Brotherhood government was never anything approaching a dictatorship. Comrade Grumpy Apr 2014 #8

That Was A 'One Man, One Vote, Once' Election, Comrade The Magistrate Apr 2014 #9

Right. Because the MB controlled all the levers of power. Comrade Grumpy Apr 2014 #11

Correct, despite the nonsense spread about saying otherwise. Jefferson23 Apr 2014 #12

I have no surprise at this "revelation" Scootaloo Apr 2014 #15

I Have Been Called Worse By Better, Sir The Magistrate Apr 2014 #18

So people at all levels are disgusted by you? Scootaloo Apr 2014 #20

I don't support this, but it still needs to be said Blue_Tires Apr 2014 #14

"I don't support this, but," ... "I'm not a racist, but," ... "I'm a liberal, but" ... Scootaloo Apr 2014 #16

I'm not taking a side either way -- They're both dirty in my eyes... Blue_Tires Apr 2014 #17

"But" tends to turn whatever precedes it into a lie Scootaloo Apr 2014 #19

I guess I'm just cynical enough to think Blue_Tires Apr 2014 #22

You're trying so hard to equivocate and justify Scootaloo Apr 2014 #25

And you're trying a little too hard to whitewash Morsi Blue_Tires Apr 2014 #29

"judge also reversed 492 death sentences out of 529 passed in March" JI7 Apr 2014 #2

Yes, it's possible. Igel Apr 2014 #21

This is sickening, huge mistake to support such a thing. n/t Jefferson23 Apr 2014 #10

HRW: In Egypt, the Minya criminal court this morning sentenced 683 people to death Jefferson23 Apr 2014 #13

"White House 'Deeply Troubled' By Mass Death Sentences in Egypt" Comrade Grumpy Apr 2014 #23

Not troubled enough to call it a coup, condemn the junta, or cut off our funding of it Scootaloo Apr 2014 #26

True enough. The whole Egyptian Arab Spring has been hard for the administration to handle. Comrade Grumpy Apr 2014 #28

Egypt�s Courts Mock Justice With More Mass Death Sentences Jefferson23 Apr 2014 #24

683 in one trial sentenced to death? daleo Apr 2014 #27