Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Judge says it was OK to sell widow's home over $6 bill [View all]mahatmakanejeeves
(67,920 posts)14. This happens all over.
Washington, DC, for example:
Left With Nothing: Washington Post Series on Tax Lien Sales
(Washington, D.C.) Tax lien sales canceled after Post investigation; Gray calls for reforms
Predatory Tax Lien Buyer Spreading Misery Across U.S., But Whos Behind It?
Yesterday, the Washington Post published Michael Sallah and Debbie Cenzipers exhaustive account of their attempt to identify the owners of a firm that threatened to foreclose on hundreds of residents of the District of Columbia.
Aeon Financial has been the most aggressive buyer of tax liens in the District, purchasing over 1,000 of them and attempting to foreclose on over 700 homeowners. Its operating procedure is to cold-contact homeowners whose liens they have purchased and demand not only the back taxes, but additional legal fees that often amount to three times the tax debt.
The company is incorporated in Delaware, but claims to be headquartered in Chicagos Willis Tower. When The Post showed up at the Tower and inquired as to the location of Aeons offices, Tower officials informed it that Aeon was not a tenant. Secondary addresses in the Chicago area were discovered to be United Parcel Services stores. Eventually, The Post tracked ownership of the company back to Mark Alan Schwartz, a lawyer who claimed only to be representing it.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
36 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
So let's say she isnt as smart as you. Is your point she deserves losing her house?
rhett o rick
Apr 2014
#33
We have laws, but we also have common sense. This is not what our society is about.
rhett o rick
Apr 2014
#34
Pretty harsh on determining whether she was grieving hard enough to have troubles.
peace13
Apr 2014
#19
Terrible to lose ones home over a $6 & change 'late fee.' Homeowners associations will do that too.
Sunlei
Apr 2014
#30
"Moreover, on Aug. 12, 2011, a notice of sale was sent by first class mail and was not returned."
Kelvin Mace
Apr 2014
#12
You know, if I were the judge I might just stop by her house on the way home from work one day...
KansDem
Apr 2014
#22
I don't understand why they didn't add the amount to the tax bill for the following year. n/t
PoliticAverse
Apr 2014
#29