Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Edward Snowden set to leak secrets about Arab leaders - report [View all]KansDem
(28,498 posts)153. You have a point...
"...everything Snowden leaked prior was to establish credibility..."
And I'm thinking the real expose is yet to come. He can start with the 28 redacted pages of the 9/11 report.
From July, 2003--
Bush Won't Reveal Saudi 9/11 Info
--excerpt--
"I absolutely have no qualms at all because there's an ongoing investigation into the 9-11 attacks, and we don't want to compromise that investigation," Mr. Bush said at an earlier news conference with Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon in the Rose Garden.
"If people are being investigated, it doesn't make sense for us to let them know who they are," Mr. Bush told reporters before meeting with al-Faisal.
Moreover, Mr. Bush said, "declassification of that part of a 900-page document would reveal sources and methods that would make it harder for us to win the war on terror. ... It would help the enemy if they knew our sources and methods."
The decision came against a background of controversy over whether officials in Saudi Arabia had connections with the terrorists.
Earlier, citing the Saudi ambassador's claim that his country has "nothing to hide," Sen. Bob Graham called on Mr. Bush to release the report.
Doing so "will permit the Saudi government to deal with any questions which may be raised in the currently censored pages, and allow the American people to make their own judgment about who are our true friends and allies in the war on terrorism," Graham, D-Fla., said in a letter to Mr. Bush. Graham, who co-chaired the inquiry, is a Democratic presidential candidate.
After the report was released last Thursday, Saudi Ambassador Prince Bandar bin Sultan issued a statement saying that "28 blanked-out pages are being used by some to malign our country and our people."
--more--
CBS News
--excerpt--
"I absolutely have no qualms at all because there's an ongoing investigation into the 9-11 attacks, and we don't want to compromise that investigation," Mr. Bush said at an earlier news conference with Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon in the Rose Garden.
"If people are being investigated, it doesn't make sense for us to let them know who they are," Mr. Bush told reporters before meeting with al-Faisal.
Moreover, Mr. Bush said, "declassification of that part of a 900-page document would reveal sources and methods that would make it harder for us to win the war on terror. ... It would help the enemy if they knew our sources and methods."
The decision came against a background of controversy over whether officials in Saudi Arabia had connections with the terrorists.
Earlier, citing the Saudi ambassador's claim that his country has "nothing to hide," Sen. Bob Graham called on Mr. Bush to release the report.
Doing so "will permit the Saudi government to deal with any questions which may be raised in the currently censored pages, and allow the American people to make their own judgment about who are our true friends and allies in the war on terrorism," Graham, D-Fla., said in a letter to Mr. Bush. Graham, who co-chaired the inquiry, is a Democratic presidential candidate.
After the report was released last Thursday, Saudi Ambassador Prince Bandar bin Sultan issued a statement saying that "28 blanked-out pages are being used by some to malign our country and our people."
--more--
CBS News
I have to laugh at Bush's insistence that there was an "ongoing investigation" into the 9/11 attacks. Just like there was a search for WMDs in Iraq? Did he "get the intel wrong" on both investigations?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
178 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Guess he wants more attention. He's not doing this to help bring about peace. n/t
pnwmom
Apr 2014
#1
While the rest of the world is fighting, his buddy Putin can put the old gang back together...
MADem
Apr 2014
#3
We don't yet what will happen after the disclosures, but the info belongs to the 100%, not only
merrily
Apr 2014
#14
Perhaps Snowden should put that theory to the test and release something about Bolivia...
brooklynite
Apr 2014
#33
At this juncture, we don't know if the OP story is true, let alone what Snowden will
merrily
Apr 2014
#68
Whether someone takes that story at face value probably depends on what they already
merrily
May 2014
#135
He sings for his supper!! Maybe the devil, maybe the lord, but he's gotta serve somebody!
MADem
Apr 2014
#67
We already know, /w old saudi oil family Bush "shenanigans" & Cheney a citizen of Dubai ;)
Sunlei
Apr 2014
#72
Would you like to know the truth if revealing diplomatic efforts endangers allies
pnwmom
Apr 2014
#99
But you won't be hearing all of the information. Just like you haven't seen anything revealed
okaawhatever
Apr 2014
#107
The Arab world has been hiding behind the Bush Family too long. I want their secrets revealed.
McCamy Taylor
Apr 2014
#4
Revealing our allies and their secrets damages our ability to carry out sensitive diplomatic
pnwmom
Apr 2014
#13
No, logic and common sense makes them true. We have agents working undercover in countries
pnwmom
Apr 2014
#16
Iran probably knows who they are better than our bureacrats so and certainly better than we do.
merrily
Apr 2014
#17
You have no basis for thinking that's "probably" true -- just wishful thinking. n/t
pnwmom
Apr 2014
#18
You're welcome. Full disclosure, though: I am less concerned with Snowden as an individual than I
merrily
Apr 2014
#30
He has already exposed at least one NSA agent in the field, through poorly redacted
pnwmom
Apr 2014
#97
I doubt that the names of agents will be revealed. I don't think that Snowden himself
JDPriestly
Apr 2014
#39
The tension arose because Australia was snooping on the president of Indonesia.
JDPriestly
Apr 2014
#111
Allies have always shared information with each other. But Snowden is making that much harder.
pnwmom
Apr 2014
#112
We really can't condemn the Russians for their heavy-handed Putin government if we allow
JDPriestly
Apr 2014
#126
Oh, please. You think we have secret agents in Iran to "maintain peace in the region"?
Comrade Grumpy
Apr 2014
#106
Defending government and taking everything it says at face value (or pretending to) is NOT
merrily
Apr 2014
#31
If it is about the Saudis' want to keep out of their country any protest for democracy & hiring
Sunlei
Apr 2014
#43
I wonder what his haters would say if he talked about a missile hitting TWA Flight 800
Reter
Apr 2014
#57
Heaven help anyone who brakes and is hit by one of those assclowns...it'll be his fault if anyone
MADem
Apr 2014
#82
who knows how many RW people have access to those files & will be sure to use them for politicals?
Sunlei
Apr 2014
#78
There is something very "off" about this entire tale. I'm not sure it's even for real.
MADem
Apr 2014
#83
Who knows, likely someones propaganda..but I am trying to find out more about
Jefferson23
Apr 2014
#119
I sincerely hope he connects the dots on Bandar bin Bush & 9/11 as Congressional Inquiry likely did
yurbud
May 2014
#147