Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jakeXT

(10,575 posts)
15. Still using your enemy's supply lines, isn't that a bit risky ?
Thu May 1, 2014, 04:58 PM
May 2014
NATO would continue using a key overland supply route through Russia for its forces in Afghanistan known as the Northern Distribution Network, which carried about 40 percent of all alliance supplies to Afghanistan in 2013. The rail route, leading from northern Afghanistan to Poland and the Baltic nations, is considered crucial because it is safer than the ambush-prone alternative route through Pakistan.

The diplomat said cooperation in equipping and training the Afghan air force in the use of Russian helicopters also would continue, as would joint efforts to fight the Afghan drugs trade.

"These are issues that are vital to both sides, so it's natural to continue working together," the official said.

In Washington, a Defense Department official said there had been no problems with Russia when it came to moving freight through the northern route since the outbreak of the Ukraine crisis.

http://www.military.com/daily-news/2014/04/02/nato-to-keep-working-with-russia-in-afghanistan.html

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Message auto-removed Name removed May 2014 #1
So you're saying international standards we value only apply ... Alhena May 2014 #2
It's interesting that the Crimea and now Estonia are mentioned... IthinkThereforeIAM May 2014 #5
They overlook little technical details when we are running low on enemies. jtuck004 May 2014 #3
Man, that was good. Someone ballyhoo May 2014 #8
The fear that Ukraine might join NATO likely figured into Putin's calculus Algernon Moncrieff May 2014 #4
Post removed Post removed May 2014 #24
That's roughly 150 million people you condemned daleo May 2014 #27
I've been to Russia, was a little anxious about it, but the people couldn't have been nicer Rhiannon12866 May 2014 #28
Ukraine has absolutely nothing to do with NATO nyabingi May 2014 #6
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2014 #25
Read the Russian news. Igel May 2014 #20
LOL! Tell us something from this century! JVS May 2014 #7
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2014 #9
Before 2000 was the last century dipsydoodle May 2014 #11
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2014 #22
Russian official: NATO is now an adversary pampango May 2014 #10
Just between us chickens, was Russia really ever not an adversary in the minds of D.C. and others? merrily May 2014 #12
No. They will be an adversary as long ballyhoo May 2014 #13
Yep. Maybe longer. merrily May 2014 #14
It's entirely possible that Putin ballyhoo May 2014 #18
Except when you look at what Putin has done. EmilyAnne May 2014 #19
Nowhere near as bad a the Sultan of Brunei, but the govt and its propaganda machines have yet to merrily May 2014 #30
I don't know about this May Day, but I think merrily May 2014 #29
I've always wondered that, Merrily. Maybe it's ballyhoo May 2014 #31
Wonder no more. The wiki to which I linked you explains. merrily May 2014 #32
Still using your enemy's supply lines, isn't that a bit risky ? jakeXT May 2014 #15
Why should I see the Russian People as an adversary? Republicans yes, but Russians? YOHABLO May 2014 #16
NATO = Adversary DeSwiss May 2014 #17
guess its time... Xolodno May 2014 #21
I have a feeling that military, CIA, FBI, Homeland Security, NSA, Secret Service, etc. did not merrily May 2014 #33
So let's get this straight, imthevicar May 2014 #23
* ronnie624 May 2014 #34
What a silly comment RedFury May 2014 #26
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»NATO official: Russia now...»Reply #15