Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Total Ban On GM Corn in France Follows Popular Opposition [View all]FarrenH
(768 posts)frequently line up behind thoroughly discredited cranks. Look at all of Wakefield's fans. No, my friend, you are not scientifically literate. The Journal that published it actually retracted support for Seralini's paper and said it should not have been published. Show me a published paper that hasn't been retracted from a single reputable source or tell us about a vast worldwide conspiracy of tens of thousands of scientists hiding the truth while you post laughing smilies that are more ironic than you will ever realize. I bet you don't even know why, exactly, Seralini's study is considered fatally flawed. Do you? Google Sprague Dawley Rats and discover how the entire breed of rats has been bred specifically to naturally have a high incidence of tumours for cancer research. Feed them any goddamn thing and they get big nasty tumours. Then tell me that Seralini, who was a hysterical anti-GMO advocate before doing the research, is an honest scientist. He's the worst kind of fraud. One who subordinates scientific objectivity to political conviction then tries to deceive the public that what he's doing is science.