Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Total Ban On GM Corn in France Follows Popular Opposition [View all]DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)When someone can show me Monsanto's laboratory tests that meet these, I might form a different opinion. Otherwise all this crying and gnashing of teeth is so much malarkey. The EU has scientific standards they enforce, and we don't. It's as simple as that. When someone can show me how Monsanto's ''GMO experimentation'' has been duplicated by an outside non-interesed third-party who has found no adverse impact on human health, then maybe I'd relent. But they haven't found such data, and they won't because it doesn't exist.
I've seen countless people speaking here at DU about Seralinni's lab tests as if they themselves conducted them. Fine. But why does no one wants to address the perfidy and outright corruption within the FDA which has allowed this Monsanto shit to happen? And if there's no problem with it, then why not be proud of it and label it?
Why no discussion of Seralinni's primary argument -- Monsanto's shit doesn't meet minimum scientific testing protocols!!!! Never mind. My questions are obviously rhetorical since no one, and I mean absolutely NO ONE has an answer for it.
- You know, whenever people start holding up science in this way to protect bullshit, all they end up doing is giving science another black-eye. And its got plenty of those already.