Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Victory! Vermont Passes Landmark GMO Labeling Law [View all]Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)14. All peer-reviewed studies are saying GMOs are safe? Really?
A long-term toxicology study on pigs fed a combined genetically modified (GM) soy and GM maize diet
Abstract
A significant number of genetically modified (GM) crops have been approved to enter human food and animal feed since 1996, including crops containing several GM genes 'stacked' into the one plant. We randomised and fed isowean pigs (N=168) either a mixed GM soy and GM corn (maize) diet (N=84) or an equivalent non-GM diet (N=84) in a long- term toxicology study of 22.7 weeks (the normal lifespan of a commercial pig from weaning to slaughter). Equal numbers of male and female pigs were present in each group. The GM corn contained double and triple-stacked varieties. Feed intake, weight gain, mortality and blood biochemistry were measured. Organ weights and pathology were determined post-mortem. There were no differences between pigs fed the GM and non-GM diets for feed intake, weight gain, mortality, and routine blood biochemistry measurements. The GM diet was associated with gastric and uterine differences in pigs. GM-fed pigs had uteri that were 25% heavier than non-GM fed pigs (p=0.025). GM-fed pigs had a higher rate of severe stomach inflammation with a rate of 32% of GM-fed pigs compared to 12% of non-GM-fed pigs (p=0.004). The severe stomach inflammation was worse in GM-fed males compared to non-GM fed males by a factor of 4.0 (p=0.041), and GM-fed females compared to non-GM fed females by a factor of 2.2 (p=0.034).
http://www.biosafety-info.net/article.php?aid=977
Abstract
A significant number of genetically modified (GM) crops have been approved to enter human food and animal feed since 1996, including crops containing several GM genes 'stacked' into the one plant. We randomised and fed isowean pigs (N=168) either a mixed GM soy and GM corn (maize) diet (N=84) or an equivalent non-GM diet (N=84) in a long- term toxicology study of 22.7 weeks (the normal lifespan of a commercial pig from weaning to slaughter). Equal numbers of male and female pigs were present in each group. The GM corn contained double and triple-stacked varieties. Feed intake, weight gain, mortality and blood biochemistry were measured. Organ weights and pathology were determined post-mortem. There were no differences between pigs fed the GM and non-GM diets for feed intake, weight gain, mortality, and routine blood biochemistry measurements. The GM diet was associated with gastric and uterine differences in pigs. GM-fed pigs had uteri that were 25% heavier than non-GM fed pigs (p=0.025). GM-fed pigs had a higher rate of severe stomach inflammation with a rate of 32% of GM-fed pigs compared to 12% of non-GM-fed pigs (p=0.004). The severe stomach inflammation was worse in GM-fed males compared to non-GM fed males by a factor of 4.0 (p=0.041), and GM-fed females compared to non-GM fed females by a factor of 2.2 (p=0.034).
http://www.biosafety-info.net/article.php?aid=977
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
138 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If CA does it, products are likely to be labeled everywhere because of the size of the pop.
7962
May 2014
#29
Do you work for Monsanto or perhaps received incentives from Monsanto to post here?
951-Riverside
May 2014
#8
"I'm not making any accusations..." But you are when you ask a question like that.
yellowcanine
May 2014
#45
"If GMOs are so great, label them! Problem with that is that nearly all processed foods would have
yellowcanine
May 2014
#44
Your argument for costs rising are the same misinformation used to defeat labeling bills
BrotherIvan
May 2014
#48
The FDA policy on GMOs was in place long before Obama's food czar. Lots of misinformation here.
yellowcanine
May 2014
#51
If its safe, then there should be no opposition to labeling the foods. MAke it my choice.
7962
May 2014
#30
I get what he's trying to say, although those religious aspects would be "need" to those people
7962
May 2014
#47
Just another stupid, widely debunked, poorly constructed and dishonestly reported study
psiman
May 2014
#23
The only thing important to todays 'big-ag' is that *meat* passes processing & sells.
Sunlei
May 2014
#36
you're right. The USA does need food regulations that benefit the humans instead of the Corp$$
Sunlei
May 2014
#33
You're really pushing the debunked claim about farmers getting sued for cross pollination?
HuckleB
May 2014
#42
If I use something that a company is selling without paying for it, that's called stealing.
HuckleB
May 2014
#72
Then you should support labeling more than anyone for their safety & economical value.
mother earth
May 2014
#31
I'm not a horticulturalist but I think plant hybridization is different from genetic engineering
Overseas
May 2014
#71
Except that it would not be accurate in many cases. Nearly all processed foods could contain GMO.
yellowcanine
May 2014
#52
My point is you still would not in many cases. This is feel good legislation.
yellowcanine
May 2014
#56
Knowing the type of technology that created the hybrid gives you no actual information.
HuckleB
May 2014
#78
I like how continue to confess that you have nothing to support any of your stances.
HuckleB
May 2014
#130
very cool Vermont places their state citizens first /w foods. Even with 'Obamacare'ACA their....
Sunlei
May 2014
#32
How many people were killed by putting Shell Oil from aparthied-era South Africa in their cars?
OrwellwasRight
May 2014
#135