Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

alp227

(33,272 posts)
Fri May 9, 2014, 05:29 PM May 2014

Rep. John Conyers falls far short of signatures needed for August ballot, clerk says [View all]

Source: Detroit Free Press

After a second review of petitions turned in by U.S. Rep. John Conyers, the Wayne County Clerk has found the longtime congressman only turned in 592 valid signatures, far short of the 1,000 needed to qualify for the Aug. 5 primary ballot.

The findings in the report released today, doesn’t mean that Conyers is automatically off the ballot, though. Wayne County Clerk Cathy Garrett will make a final determination on his status on Tuesday and the Conyers campaign will have three days to appeal to the Michigan Secretary of State.

The initial review showed 1,193 valid signatures, but 644 more signatures were thrown off because petition circulators were not properly registered to vote, a requirement under state law.

Conyers turned in 2,000 signatures on April 18, and Garrett’s office found that 1,193 of those signatures were valid. State law says that Conyers needs at least 1,000 valid signatures and they must come from and be gathered by registered voters. But Garrett also found, however, that two petition circulators weren’t properly registered to vote, and with that, today’s report shows that Conyers has 592 valid signatures.

Read more: http://www.freep.com/article/20140509/NEWS06/305090155

36 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This can't be good...... a kennedy May 2014 #1
Sorry to hijack first post! More detailed report here: joshcryer May 2014 #9
Does Rep Conyers support homophobia and antisemetism? FrodosPet May 2014 #21
Beginning to sniff a stink. oldandhappy May 2014 #2
Maybe this is where the stink is coming from FrodosPet May 2014 #22
What? Conyers could lose his seat? nt bananas May 2014 #3
I'm sorry, did it say the people gathering the signatures must themselves be registered voters? tclambert May 2014 #4
It is a long standing state law. former9thward May 2014 #5
True enough. But does it make any sense? tkmorris May 2014 #19
Maybe it does not make sense. former9thward May 2014 #20
More backdoor disenfranchisement. This is an outrage. n/t freshwest May 2014 #6
His Democratic primary opponent (and alleged friend) mounted the challenge. merrily May 2014 #14
Outrage?seriously? yeoman6987 May 2014 #27
This message was self-deleted by its author freshwest May 2014 #28
ACLU: Mich. law that bars Conyers from ballot unconstitutional freshwest May 2014 #31
Even if Conyers got it ruled unconstitutional... joshcryer May 2014 #8
It's the same in NY Renew Deal May 2014 #26
Temp agencies that that hire labor for these campaigns are pretty shady Ash_F May 2014 #7
How could no one in Conyers office NOT check these people. littlewolf May 2014 #10
The options. Jesus Malverde May 2014 #11
Rep. John Conyers falls far short of signatures needed for August ballot, clerk says struggle4progress May 2014 #12
Another Democrat with seniority out of office. I recall his hearings during the last Bush year. freshwest May 2014 #32
Conyers' campaign was undoubtedly remiss, but, also, this could have been a setup. merrily May 2014 #13
Well it's been done in worse circumstances davidpdx May 2014 #15
Why would I hope for something I thought would be impossible? merrily May 2014 #16
Why does a campaign get lax? former9thward May 2014 #18
I don't see a lot wrong with paying someone to gather signatures. merrily May 2014 #23
P.S. No evidence whatever that he took voters for granted at all, let alone that he had merrily May 2014 #25
Oh please... former9thward May 2014 #30
The US Congress has lower turnover than the Soviet Politburo did Recursion May 2014 #34
The only reason the Politburo had a higher turnover is a somewhat higher average age. former9thward May 2014 #35
Well, and purges Recursion May 2014 #36
From the article Jesus Malverde May 2014 #17
Thanks, Jesus. We don't know all the circumstances. merrily May 2014 #24
Can he run as an independent, like Lieberman did? Nye Bevan May 2014 #29
At least two lawsuits on this: struggle4progress May 2014 #33
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Rep. John Conyers falls f...