Which is still an oxymoron.
I have posted about my sexual assault on DU. The force he used was to carry me, unconscious, to his bed, pull my jeans and underwear only halfway down because he couldn't do more when struggling against dead weight, and start thrusting into me from behind.
But obviously he deserved the prosecution deciding not to charge him, despite admitting what he did under interrogation. After all, I didn't have any bruises. He didn't use "violence". And obviously I was asking for it by getting drunk around someone I'd known for three years and thought I could trust. I was just so sexy lying there that he couldn't help himself, right? It wasn't "rape-rape", so shouldn't be penalized in the same way.
In my state, both what happened to me and what happened to this little girl you call "sexually mature" at the tender age of 14 would be charged (if prosecutors or judges had the decency to pursue these cases instead of the "easy wins"
as the class-Y felony "rape", and carry a minimum sentence of 10 years.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
= new reply since forum marked as read