Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FrodosPet

(5,169 posts)
21. Does Rep Conyers support homophobia and antisemetism?
Sun May 11, 2014, 06:15 PM
May 2014

Sorry to derail, but do we REALLY need to be upset that an 84 year old supporter of the Nation Of Islam, may have to retire?

-----------------------------------------------------------

Farrakhan: African Americans deserve their own courts

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/02/23/farrakhan-african-americans-deserve-their-own-courts/5765897/

DETROIT -- In a fiery speech Sunday delivered to 18,000 at Joe Louis Arena, Minister Louis Farrakhan blasted the judicial systems in the U.S. as being biased against African Americans, calling upon the community to set up their own courts.

"We want equal justice under the law," Farrakhan said on the last day of the Nation of Islam's annual convention, held in Detroit this year. "Our people can't take much more. We have to have our own courts."

With Rep. John Conyers, D-Mich., and Detroit City Council President Brenda Jones sitting behind him, Farrakhan spoke for nearly three hours, reiterating the Nation of Islam's view that the U.S. is a land headed for destruction because it has disobeyed the word of God.

Farrakhan suggested that African Americans rely on the Quran and Bible to help set up their own legal system that would be more fair to African Americans.

~ snip ~

-----------------------------------------------------------

So does Rep Conyers agree with Minister Farrakhan about setting up a separate race and religion based court system, or is he just using him as a political prop?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This can't be good...... a kennedy May 2014 #1
Sorry to hijack first post! More detailed report here: joshcryer May 2014 #9
Does Rep Conyers support homophobia and antisemetism? FrodosPet May 2014 #21
Beginning to sniff a stink. oldandhappy May 2014 #2
Maybe this is where the stink is coming from FrodosPet May 2014 #22
What? Conyers could lose his seat? nt bananas May 2014 #3
I'm sorry, did it say the people gathering the signatures must themselves be registered voters? tclambert May 2014 #4
It is a long standing state law. former9thward May 2014 #5
True enough. But does it make any sense? tkmorris May 2014 #19
Maybe it does not make sense. former9thward May 2014 #20
More backdoor disenfranchisement. This is an outrage. n/t freshwest May 2014 #6
His Democratic primary opponent (and alleged friend) mounted the challenge. merrily May 2014 #14
Outrage?seriously? yeoman6987 May 2014 #27
This message was self-deleted by its author freshwest May 2014 #28
ACLU: Mich. law that bars Conyers from ballot unconstitutional freshwest May 2014 #31
Even if Conyers got it ruled unconstitutional... joshcryer May 2014 #8
It's the same in NY Renew Deal May 2014 #26
Temp agencies that that hire labor for these campaigns are pretty shady Ash_F May 2014 #7
How could no one in Conyers office NOT check these people. littlewolf May 2014 #10
The options. Jesus Malverde May 2014 #11
Rep. John Conyers falls far short of signatures needed for August ballot, clerk says struggle4progress May 2014 #12
Another Democrat with seniority out of office. I recall his hearings during the last Bush year. freshwest May 2014 #32
Conyers' campaign was undoubtedly remiss, but, also, this could have been a setup. merrily May 2014 #13
Well it's been done in worse circumstances davidpdx May 2014 #15
Why would I hope for something I thought would be impossible? merrily May 2014 #16
Why does a campaign get lax? former9thward May 2014 #18
I don't see a lot wrong with paying someone to gather signatures. merrily May 2014 #23
P.S. No evidence whatever that he took voters for granted at all, let alone that he had merrily May 2014 #25
Oh please... former9thward May 2014 #30
The US Congress has lower turnover than the Soviet Politburo did Recursion May 2014 #34
The only reason the Politburo had a higher turnover is a somewhat higher average age. former9thward May 2014 #35
Well, and purges Recursion May 2014 #36
From the article Jesus Malverde May 2014 #17
Thanks, Jesus. We don't know all the circumstances. merrily May 2014 #24
Can he run as an independent, like Lieberman did? Nye Bevan May 2014 #29
At least two lawsuits on this: struggle4progress May 2014 #33
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Rep. John Conyers falls f...»Reply #21