Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FrodosPet

(5,169 posts)
22. Maybe this is where the stink is coming from
Sun May 11, 2014, 06:25 PM
May 2014

With Rep. John Conyers, D-Mich., and Detroit City Council President Brenda Jones sitting behind him, Farrakhan spoke for nearly three hours, reiterating the Nation of Islam's view that the U.S. is a land headed for destruction because it has disobeyed the word of God.

~ snip ~

Farrakhan railed against Christian pastors who endorse gay marriage, which he said contradicts the teachings of Christianity and Islam.

"God has never sanctioned that kind of behavior," Farrakhan said.

~ snip ~

--------------------------------------------------------

Or maybe this?

--------------------------------------------------------

John Conyers apologizes for Louis Farrakhan's anti-Semitic remarks

6:55 PM, May 23, 2013

http://www.freep.com/article/20130523/NEWS01/305230119/John-Conyers-apologizes-for-Farrakhan-s-anti-Semitic-remarks

U.S. Rep. John Conyers, a Detroit Democrat, apologized today for Louis Farrakhan’s anti-Semitic comments during a talk he gave in a Detroit church last week.

Conyers, who attended Farrakhan’s speech Friday night at Fellowship Chapel, issued a strong statement that distanced himself from the Nation of Islam leader’s remarks, which were blasted earlier this week by a Jewish civil rights group and others.

“Farrakhan made unacceptable racist, anti-Semitic and homophobic statements, which I condemn in the strongest possible terms,” Conyers said. “It was my expectation that Minister Farrakhan’s speech would focus on the many challenges facing the city of Detroit. In previous days, he had discussed efforts to revitalize our city by purchasing property and investing in blighted neighborhoods. Regrettably, he used this opportunity to promote views that have no place in civilized discourse.”

As the Free Press reported exclusively, Farrakhan attacked what he called “Satanic Jews” and the “Synagogue of Satan,” claiming Jewish people control major institutions in the U.S., such as the news media. Farrakhan also alleged that President Barack Obama “surrounded himself with Satan ... members of the Jewish community.”

~ snip ~

--------------------------------------------------------

But in 2014, we are to believe Rep Conyers had no idea that the Minister would say something profoundly offensive and anti-progressive when he was seated behind him?

Unfortunately, it appears Rep Conyers is suffering from either bigotry, hypocrisy, or memory loss.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This can't be good...... a kennedy May 2014 #1
Sorry to hijack first post! More detailed report here: joshcryer May 2014 #9
Does Rep Conyers support homophobia and antisemetism? FrodosPet May 2014 #21
Beginning to sniff a stink. oldandhappy May 2014 #2
Maybe this is where the stink is coming from FrodosPet May 2014 #22
What? Conyers could lose his seat? nt bananas May 2014 #3
I'm sorry, did it say the people gathering the signatures must themselves be registered voters? tclambert May 2014 #4
It is a long standing state law. former9thward May 2014 #5
True enough. But does it make any sense? tkmorris May 2014 #19
Maybe it does not make sense. former9thward May 2014 #20
More backdoor disenfranchisement. This is an outrage. n/t freshwest May 2014 #6
His Democratic primary opponent (and alleged friend) mounted the challenge. merrily May 2014 #14
Outrage?seriously? yeoman6987 May 2014 #27
This message was self-deleted by its author freshwest May 2014 #28
ACLU: Mich. law that bars Conyers from ballot unconstitutional freshwest May 2014 #31
Even if Conyers got it ruled unconstitutional... joshcryer May 2014 #8
It's the same in NY Renew Deal May 2014 #26
Temp agencies that that hire labor for these campaigns are pretty shady Ash_F May 2014 #7
How could no one in Conyers office NOT check these people. littlewolf May 2014 #10
The options. Jesus Malverde May 2014 #11
Rep. John Conyers falls far short of signatures needed for August ballot, clerk says struggle4progress May 2014 #12
Another Democrat with seniority out of office. I recall his hearings during the last Bush year. freshwest May 2014 #32
Conyers' campaign was undoubtedly remiss, but, also, this could have been a setup. merrily May 2014 #13
Well it's been done in worse circumstances davidpdx May 2014 #15
Why would I hope for something I thought would be impossible? merrily May 2014 #16
Why does a campaign get lax? former9thward May 2014 #18
I don't see a lot wrong with paying someone to gather signatures. merrily May 2014 #23
P.S. No evidence whatever that he took voters for granted at all, let alone that he had merrily May 2014 #25
Oh please... former9thward May 2014 #30
The US Congress has lower turnover than the Soviet Politburo did Recursion May 2014 #34
The only reason the Politburo had a higher turnover is a somewhat higher average age. former9thward May 2014 #35
Well, and purges Recursion May 2014 #36
From the article Jesus Malverde May 2014 #17
Thanks, Jesus. We don't know all the circumstances. merrily May 2014 #24
Can he run as an independent, like Lieberman did? Nye Bevan May 2014 #29
At least two lawsuits on this: struggle4progress May 2014 #33
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Rep. John Conyers falls f...»Reply #22